Decitabine Combining Dexamethasone Versus Dexamethasone in Management of ITP

August 13, 2018 updated by: Ming Hou, Shandong University

A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study of Dexamethasone Combined With Decitabine Versus Dexamethasone in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP)

The project was undertaking by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University and other 18 well-known hospitals in China. In order to report the efficacy and safety of decitabine combining with dexamethasone for the treatment of adults with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), compared to dexamethasone alone .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators anticipate to undertaking a parallel group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 200 ITP adult patients from 19 medical centers in China. One part of the participants are randomly selected to receive dexamethasone (given 40mg/d for 4 consecutive days as a cycle , If platelet count remained below 30 × 109/L or there were bleeding symptoms by day 10, an additional cycle of dexamethasone was given) combining with decitabine (given intravenously at a dose of 3.5mg/m2/d for 4 consecutive days as a cycle and repeated every 2 weeks for 3 cycles), the others are selected to receive dexamethasone therapy(given 40mg/d for 4 consecutive days as a cycle, If platelet count remained below 30 × 109/L or there were bleeding symptoms by day 10, an additional cycle of dexamethasone was given). Platelet count, bleeding and other symptoms were evaluated before and after treatment, adverse events are also recorded throughout the study in order to report the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy compared to dexemathasone alone therapy for the treatment of adults with ITP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Meet the diagnostic criteria for immune thrombocytopenia.
  2. within 3 months fromdiagnosis,untreated patients, may be male or female, between the ages of 18 ~ 80 years.
  3. To show a platelet count < 30×10^9/L, and with bleeding manifestations.
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)performance status ≤ 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Received chemotherapy or anticoagulants or other drugs affecting the platelet counts within 3 months before the screening visit.
  2. Received high-dose steroids or intravenous immunoglobulin transfusion(IVIG) in the 3 weeks prior to the start of the study.
  3. Current HIV infection or hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus infections.
  4. Severe medical condition (lung, hepatic or renal disorder) other than ITP. Unstable or uncontrolled disease or condition related to or impacting cardiac function (e.g., unstable angina, congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension or cardiac arrhythmia)
  5. Female patients who are nursing or pregnant, who may be pregnant, or who contemplate pregnancy during the study period.
  6. Have a known diagnosis of other autoimmune diseases, established in the medical history and laboratory findings with positive results for the determination of antinuclear antibodies, anti-cardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant or direct Coombs test.
  7. Patients who are deemed unsuitable for the study by the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: combination treatment group
100 enrolled patients are randomly picked up to take decitabine in combination with dexamethasone at the indicated dose
given intravenously at a dose of 3.5mg/m2/d for 4 consecutive days as a cycle and repeated every 2 weeks for 3cycles
Other Names:
  • pharmachemie
given 40mg/d for 4 consecutive days as a cycle , If platelet count remained below 30 × 109/L or there were bleeding symptoms by day 10, an additional cycle of dexamethasone was given.
Other Names:
  • Hydrocortisone
Active Comparator: single treatment group
100 enrolled patients are randomly picked up to take dexamethasone at the indicated dose
given 40mg/d for 4 consecutive days as a cycle , If platelet count remained below 30 × 109/L or there were bleeding symptoms by day 10, an additional cycle of dexamethasone was given.
Other Names:
  • Hydrocortisone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of platelet response(continuous response rate)
Time Frame: up to 1 year per subject
Complete Response:a sustained (≥ 3 months) platelet count ≥100×10^9/L;response: a sustained (≥ 3 months) platelet count ≥ 30×10^9/L without recurrence of thrombocytopenia;No response (NR): platelet count < 30 × 10^9/L or a less than two fold increase in platelet count from baseline or the presence of bleeding. Platelet count must be measured on two occasions more than a day apart.
up to 1 year per subject

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
therapy associated adverse events
Time Frame: up to 1 year per subject
The number and frequency of therapy associated adverse events
up to 1 year per subject

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 13, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic

Clinical Trials on Decitabine

3
Subscribe