Technology and Early Anxiety Treatment

July 1, 2020 updated by: Jonathan S. Comer, Florida International University

Harnessing Technology to Extend the Reach of Supported Care for Families Affected by Early Child Social Anxiety

The goal of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of an Internet-delivered format of an evidence-based CBT treatment for early social anxiety disorder (Coaching Approach behavior and Leading by Modeling, or the CALM Program) in which therapists and families meet in real-time via videoconferencing and parent-child interactions are broadcast from the family's home via a webcam while therapists provide bug-in-the-ear coaching from a remote site. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the proposed work will evaluate 40 youth with social anxiety disorder (ages 3-8); 20 will receive the CALM Program over the Internet (I-CALM) and 20 will be assigned to a waitlist control and will complete a course of I-CALM after the waitlist period. Outcomes will be assessed via structured diagnostic interviews and parent-report questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The goal of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of an Internet-delivered format of an evidence-based CBT treatment for early child social anxiety disorder (Coaching Approach behavior and Leading by Modeling, or the CALM Program) in which therapists and families meet in real-time via videoconferencing and parent-child interactions are broadcast from the family's home via a webcam while therapists provide bug-in-the-ear coaching from a remote site. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT), the proposed work will evaluate 40 youth with social anxiety disorder (ages 3-8); 20 will receive the CALM Program over the Internet (I-CALM) and 20 will be assigned to a waitlist control, followed by I-CALM treatment.

SPECIFIC AIMS:

  • Aim 1: To evaluate I-CALM efficacy for reducing early child social anxiety symptoms and related impairments and for improving child and parent quality of life.
  • Aim 2: To examine the extent to which I-CALM helps families overcome traditional barriers to effective care, including geographic barriers and regional professional workforce shortages in social anxiety expert care.
  • Aim 3: To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of I-CALM from the perspective of treated\ families, and lay the foundation for a large Florida statewide implementation of I-CALM for early social anxiety.

RATIONALE: Despite progress in supported programs for child social anxiety disorder, gaps persist between treatment in specialty clinics and services broadly available in the community. Although considerable advances show social anxiety is treatable when appropriate CBT is available, barriers interfere with the broad provision of quality care. Few sufferers receive services, and those who do receive services do not necessarily receive evidence-based care. Many U.S. counties have no psychologist, psychiatrist, or social worker, let alone professionals trained in supported social anxiety treatments. When effective programs are available, transportation issues constrain access, with large proportions of patients reporting that services are too far away or they have no way to get to a clinic. Expert providers cluster around metropolitan regions and major academic hubs, leaving considerable numbers of youth without access to supported service options. Youth from low-income or remote and rural communities are particularly unlikely to receive appropriate care. High rates of stigma-related beliefs further constrain service utilization, with many reporting negative attitudes about visiting a mental health clinic.

An Internet-delivered, real-time intervention for the remote treatment of early child social anxiety disorder has the potential to meaningfully extend the reach of effective social anxiety treatment for underserved youth and can serve as the critical foundation upon which to build a larger-scale statewide implementation of early social anxiety treatment. Moreover, treating youth in their homes can overcome stigma-related concerns that interfere with families attending services at a psychiatric clinic, and treatment gains may be more generalizable and ecologically valid as services are provided to youth in their natural settings.

SERVICES: The CALM Program (Coaching Approach behavior and Leading by Modeling) was developed as a developmentally compatible intervention to treat anxiety disorders in children below age 8. The CALM Program is an adaptation of Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT), which was initially developed to treat early behavior problems, and incorporates a family-based approach to early child anxiety. Whereas effective treatment for older socially anxious youth requires a set of cognitive abilities that younger children typically do not fully possess, it has been demonstrated that adaptations of PCIT-which do not target children directly, but rather work to reshape the primary contexts of child development in order to treat child anxiety-can offer more developmentally compatible approaches for intervening with early social anxiety. The CALM Program is a parent-focused treatment that educates families about social anxiety and teaches parents skills to effectively reinforce their children's brave social behavior and coaches the use of these skills during in-session parent-child interactions. The treatment emphasizes live, bug-in-the-ear coaching of parents during in vivo exposure sessions. Child symptoms are targeted by reshaping interaction patterns associated with the maintenance of child anxiety and by reducing parental accommodation of child bids to avoid social situations.

Traditionally, the CALM therapist is situated behind a one-way mirror and unobtrusively provides real-time feedback to parents through a parent-worn earpiece. It has been suggested that PCIT-based approaches are particularly amenable to a web format given that by design the therapist conducts live observation and feedback from another room via a parent-worn bug-in-the-ear device. That is, even in standard clinic-based CALM, the therapist is predominantly separated from the family in order to foster naturalistic family interactions and child behavior. Despite progress in the development of the CALM Program for social anxiety, and progress in the field of behavioral telehealth, research has yet to evaluate the efficacy of an Internet-delivered format of the CALM Program (I-PCIT) for extending the accessibility of treatment. I-CALM families will receive treatment using secure and encrypted videoconferencing software, and parents will receive live coaching via a Bluetooth earpiece. Independent evaluators will conduct diagnostic interviews, collect parent-report forms, and conduct structured observations at baseline, post-treatment, and 6-months follow-up.

OUTCOMES: Independent evaluators (IEs) masked to participant condition assignment will conduct diagnostic interviews, collect parent-report forms, and conduct structured observations at baseline, post-treatment, and 6-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33199
        • Florida International University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 8 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children 3-8 years old, and at least one primary caregiver
  • Child has diagnosis of social anxiety disorder (as assessed in pre-treatment assessment).
  • Child and parent both speak either English or Spanish fluently
  • Family's home is equipped with computing device and high-speed internet

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child has emotional/behavioral problem more impairing than difficulties captured by an anxiety disorder diagnosis.
  • Child receiving medication or other psychotherapy to manage emotional difficulties
  • History of severe physical or mental impairments (e.g., intellectual disability, deafness, blindness, pervasive developmental disorder) in child or participating caregiver(s)
  • Child is a ward of the state

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Immediate treatment
Individuals in this condition will immediately receive I-CALM treatment, which draws on videoconferencing to remotely deliver real time cognitive-behavioral therapy for early child anxiety to families in their home.
Families receiving I-CALM will immediately receive a videoconferencing-based, Internet-delivered format of an evidence-based CBT treatment for early child social anxiety disorder (Coaching Approach behavior and Leading by Modeling, or the CALM Program; Puliafico, Comer, & Albano, 2013) in which therapists and families meet in real-time via videoconferencing and parent-child interactions are broadcast from the family's home via a webcam while therapists provide bug-in-the-ear coaching from a remote site. Parents are taught and guided in how to coach their young anxious child to engage in brave, approach behavior.
OTHER: Waitlist
Individuals in Waitlist will participate in an initial waitlist condition, and then after post-waitlist assessment will be offered the I-CALM intervention. Accordingly families in this condition receive Delayed I-CALM.
Families receiving Delayed I-CALM will participate in a waitlist period, and then will complete the I-CALM treatment program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impressions Scales - Severity and Improvement (CGI-S/I)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
CGI-S/I is the most widely used clinician-rated measure of treatment-related changes in functioning (Guy & Bonato, 1970) and will be completed by IEs in the present study. The CGI-S score rates illness severity on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 ("normal") to 7 ("among the most severely ill patients"). The CGI-I rates clinical improvement on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 ("very much improved") to 7 ("very much worse").
5 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Children's Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS; Shaffer et al., 1983) is a widely used measure of overall child disturbance, providing a clinician-rated index of functioning. Scores range from 0-100, with lower scores indicating greater functional impairments.
5 minutes
Child Anxiety Impact Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The Child Anxiety Impact Scale (CAIS) is a brief parent-report measure of anxiety-related functional impairment, and has shown strong psychometric properties (Langley et al., 2014).
5 minutes
Family Burden Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 5 minutes
The Family Burden Assessment Scale (BAS) is a brief measure of subjective and objective consequences of disorder/illness on primary caretakers.
5 minutes
Family Accommodation Checklist and Interference Scale
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The Family Accommodation Checklist and Impact Scale (FACLIS; Thompson-Hollands et al., 2014) is a parent report measure of the extent to which parents are changing their behavior in attempts to prevent or reduce child distress, and has shown strong validity and reliability in samples of youth with anxiety disorders (e.g., Thompson-Hollands et al., 2014).
10 minutes
Family Accommodation Scale- Anxiety
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The Family Accommodation Scale-Anxiety (FASA) asks parents to rate the frequency of their participation in their child's anxiety-related behaviors (e.g., assisting avoidance, providing reassurance) and modification of family routines because of child anxiety. The FASA has demonstrated strong reliability and validity (Lebowitz et al., 2013).
10 minutes
Working Alliance Inventory
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The Working Alliance Inventory (Horvath, 1994) is a 36-item assessment of perceptions of the quality of therapeutic rapport and collaboration throughout treatment. Therapy participants and therapists will both rate each item independently on a scale from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) to characterize their perceptions of the affective bond between the client and therapist and the extent of their agreement about the goals and tasks of treatment. The WAI has demonstrated favorable psychometric support (Horvath & Greenberg, 1989). In the present study, we will include posttreatment total scores from Mother-reports about their perceived relationship with the therapist and from Therapist-reports about their perceived relationship with the child.
10 minutes
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 minutes
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; Larsen, Attkisson, Hargreaves & Nguyen, 1979) is a generic 8-item assessment of consumer satisfaction with services received (e.g., "How would you rate the quality of the services you received?" and "If a friend were in need of similar help, would you recommend our program to him or her?"). Each item is rated on a 4-point scale and a total score is used to reflect overall satisfaction with treatment. Mother-reports at posttreatment will included in the present study. The CSQ-8 is one of the most frequently used measures of satisfaction with services and has demonstrated strong psychometric properties across a range of treatment populations.
3 minutes
Child Behavior Checklist
Time Frame: 25 minutes
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a standardized instrument for assessing behavioral and emotional problems, demonstrating very strong psychometric properties. Caregivers rate each item as 0 (not true), 1 (somewhat or sometimes true), or 2 (very true or often true). Empirically based scales, normed for age and gender, are generated, including three broadband dimensions (internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and total problems) as well as a number of syndrome scales and DSM-oriented scales; t-scores below 65 reflect normative functioning. For the present purposes, we will included the internalizing problems scale and the anxiety problems scale. Parents of participants ages five and below will complete the CBCL 1.5-5 (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2000) and parents of youth six and older completed the CBCL 6-18 (Achenbach, 2001).
25 minutes
Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for Children (ADIS-C/P)
Time Frame: 2 hours
The ADIS is is a semi-structured diagnostic interview that assesses child psychopathology in accordance with DSM criteria.
2 hours
Spence Children's Anxiety Scale
Time Frame: 15 minutes
Spence Children's Anxiety Scale for Parents (SCAS-P; Spence, 1999)-a 39-item parent-report of child anxiety in youth ages 6-18-will be used to assess child anxiety in families with 6-8 year-olds. The SCAS-P has demonstrated good internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity (Nauta et al., 2004). The Total Score of the Preschool Anxiety Scale-Revised (PAS-R; Spence et al., 2008)-a 34-item parent-report of anxiety among preschoolers-will be used to assess child anxiety in families with 3-5 year-olds. The PAS-R is a downward extension of the SCAS-P for younger children and has demonstrated good construct validity and reliability (Spence et al., 2001).
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan S Comer, PhD, Florida International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 3, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 22, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 22, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 2, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-16-0182

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety Disorders

Clinical Trials on I-CALM

3
Subscribe