The Efficacy of Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block Versus Cutaneous and Thyroid Capsular Blocks

September 19, 2020 updated by: Mansoura University

The Efficacy of Intermediate Cervical Plexus Block Versus Cutaneous and Thyroid Capsular Blocks in Thyroid Surgeries

Thyroid gland surgery is one of the most commonly performed operations for either benign or malignant pathologies Pain related to thyroid surgery is of moderate intensity .which may be treated with NSAIDs or opioids. However, Opioids have many well-known undesirable effects, including postoperative nausea and vomiting, which are frequent after this type of procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Regional techniques of anesthesia may help to decrease post-operative pain and reduce systemic analgesic requirement. Classically, the cervical plexus is considered to have two distributions, the superficial cutaneous and the deep motor nerves.

Anatomically, the thyroid gland has an inner true capsule which is thin and adheres closely to the thyroidal tissue [Fancy et al., 2010]. External to this is a false capsule formed by the middle layer of the deep cervical fascia, which splits anterolaterally to ensheathe the thyroid gland, thus forming the thyroid sheath [Bliss et al., 2000]. In this fashion, the potential space called the capsule-sheath space is formed. It contains also loose connective tissue, blood vessels, nerves and parathyroid gland. Anesthetic deposited in this space would block the surface of thyroid gland and permeate directly into the parenchyma producing effective local anesthesia for thyroid surgical procedures. It is supposed also to involve autonomic nerve block of the thyroid gland [Fliers et al., 2010]. Additionally, a subcutaneous injection along the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) would also enhance effective local anesthesia for the initial skin incision and further contribute to a more ideal working environment for the surgeon. Therefore, anesthetic technique termed ultrasound-guided capsule-sheath space block (CSSB) combined with anterior cervical cutaneous nerves block (CCNB) for thyroidectomy is done [Wang et al., 2015] .

Our hypothesis is that a combination of simple dual techniques including superficial cutaneous block to provide sensory blockade, and surgeon mediated capsular block may afford autonomic thyroid blockade. In comparison, ultrasound guided intermediate cervical plexus block may provide these blocks but using a machine and deep penetration possibly involving unwanted blocks for phrenic and recurrent laryngeal nerves. So, if the simple safe technique can provide the same intra and postoperative anesthetic conditions it will be preferred.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansourah, DK, Egypt, 53316
        • Oncolgy Center, Mansoura University,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status grade I and grade II.
  • Euthyroidism after thyroid function tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal.
  • Thyroid gland more than 5 cm size.
  • Retrosternal extension.
  • Planned block neck dissection.
  • Neuromuscular diseases
  • Hematological diseases.
  • Bleeding diseases.
  • Coagulation abnormality.
  • Psychiatric diseases.
  • Drug abuse.
  • Local skin infection
  • sepsis at site of the block.
  • Known intolerance to the study drugs.
  • Body Mass Index > 40 Kg/m2.
  • Known diaphragmatic motion abnormalities
  • major respiratory disease.
  • Previous history of cervical surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Capsule and cutaneous blocks
7.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + Epinephrine 5 ug/ ml for both blocks per side. once before surgery
7.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + Epinephrine 5 ug/ ml for both blocks once before surgery per side
Active Comparator: US-intermediate cervical plexus block
15 mL of 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine + Epinephrine 5 microgram/ ml. per side. once before surgery
15 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + Epinephrine 5 ug/ ml once before surgery per side.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total dose of opioid analgesics used
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
The total dose of opioid analgesics required in the post-operative periods
For 24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative visual analogue score (VAS) (0 no pain -10 worst imaginable pain),
For 24 hours after surgery
Time to first analgesic request
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
Time to first request for a rescue analgesic
For 24 hours after surgery
Fentanyl use
Time Frame: For 5 hours after start of anaesthesia
Intraoperative use of fentanyl
For 5 hours after start of anaesthesia
Rocuronium use
Time Frame: For 5 hours after start of anaesthesia
Intraoperative use of rocuronium
For 5 hours after start of anaesthesia
Sensory blockade
Time Frame: for 1 hour after surgery
Assessment of sensory blockade
for 1 hour after surgery
Diaphragmatic dysfunction
Time Frame: for 5 hours after performing blockade
Diaphragmatic dysfunction using ultrasound assessment and possible x ray
for 5 hours after performing blockade
Sedation score
Time Frame: for 5 hours after performing blockade
Sedation score using Modified Ramsay scale
for 5 hours after performing blockade
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: for 24 hrs after surgery
Patient satisfaction regards analgesia using a score of (0-10) with 10 represents the highest satisfaction
for 24 hrs after surgery
Postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
frequency
For 24 hours after surgery
Postoperative headache
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
frequency
For 24 hours after surgery
Hoarseness of voice
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
frequency
For 24 hours after surgery
Dysphagia
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
frequency
For 24 hours after surgery
Respiratory difficulty
Time Frame: For 24 hours after surgery
Peripheral oxygen saturation less than 92%
For 24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Moneir O El-Hefny, MD, Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MS/17.03.138

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Thyroid Surgery

Clinical Trials on Capsule and cutaneous blocks

3
Subscribe