Effects of Neuromodulation and Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Network in Freezing of Gait (TMS/FOG)

March 3, 2021 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina

Freezing of gait (FoG) is a common and debilitating condition in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients. FoG is described as an episodic inability to walk, which often triggers falls, hospitalization and is an important predictor of poor quality of life. As locomotor regions degenerate in PD, gait automaticity is impaired. Patients compensate by increasing volitional control of gait, however, this adaptation has been found to worsen FoG severity. We hypothesize that increased cortical control of gait is maladaptive, and therapies to improve gait automaticity will not be effective unless cortical control of gait is reduced. The long-term goal of this project is to develop a therapeutic approach for FoG that simultaneously reduces cortical control and increases automaticity of gait. The objective is to determine the locomotor network abnormalities responsible for FoG and demonstrate how neuromodulation and rehabilitation can modulate the network. The rationale of this study is that increased connectivity between brainstem locomotor regions and cortical structures represents increased cortical governance of gait, and it can be reversed by the proposed intervention. We will accomplish this by combining a course of inhibitory rTMS (1Hz) to the cortex (supplementary motor area) with a rehabilitation protocol designed to increase gait automaticity (dual task training). We have designed a study that will carefully assess the locomotor network of freezers with resting state functional, diffusion and interleaved TMS/BOLD MRI studies, before and after intervention. Behavioral measures including gait analysis, cognitive and motor assessments will also be conducted at baseline and post treatment. The study aims to determine the effects of our intervention on the locomotor network (assessed with imaging), as well as on FoG severity as quantified through multiple markers obtained through gait analysis. At the conclusion of the study we expect to have determined the network changes central to the pathophysiology of FoG, the effects of 1Hz rTMS + rehabilitation on this network, and on FoG severity.

The relevance of this study to public health is to develop a non-invasive effective therapeutic option for one of the most debilitating and untreatable conditions affecting the lives of one million Americans suffering from PD; freezing of gait.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects meeting diagnostic criteria for PD and documented freezing of gait will be recruited from the MUSC Movement Disorder Clinic by clinical staff. Subjects will undergo identical imaging protocols before and after intervention. Subjects will undergo ten, 20 minute, dual task training sessions immediately following each rTMS session. Subjects will be randomized to either active rTMS + rehabilitation or rehabilitation alone at a 2:1 ratio (10 active: 5 control). The primary outcome measure will be dual task interference for turning.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects meeting diagnostic criteria for PD and documented FoG

-

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with contraindications to MRI, or TMS (no history of seizures, no metal implants in head, no pregnancy) dementia, or inability to complete the walk 30 feet in the off state without assistance will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active TMS
1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
transcranial magnetic stimulation
Placebo Comparator: Sham TMS
No active stimulation
transcranial magnetic stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Connectivity to the Supplementary Motor Area.
Time Frame: pre and post intervention (within one week of completion)
Change (pre vs post intervention) in resting-state fMRI connectivity (fisher z-score) of the supplemental motor area (SMA). A negative change score means there was a reduction in SMA connectivity pre to post intervention. A positive change score means there was an increase in SMA connectivity pre to post intervention.
pre and post intervention (within one week of completion)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in New Freezing of Gait Questionnaire
Time Frame: pre and post intervention (within one week of completion)
The new freezing of gait questionnaire is a measure of freezing severity (total score range: 0-28) wherein higher scores represent worse freezing behavior. The outcome measures represent the change in freezing of gait questionnaire score from pre to post intervention. A larger, positive value represents a greater reduction in freezing severity and a better outcome.
pre and post intervention (within one week of completion)
Change in Dual Task Time to Turn Off
Time Frame: pre and post intervention (within one week of completion)
The time to turn around a cone (in seconds) while dual tasking (performing a serial 7s and/or every other letter of the alphabet task) was measured while participants were in the OFF state (off of their Parkinson's medication). The assessment were performed pre to post intervention. A greater reduction in time to turn (pre versus post interverntion) is represented by a larger positive number. A larger reduction in time to turn represents a better outcome.
pre and post intervention (within one week of completion)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gonzalo Revuelta, DO, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease With Freezing of Gait

Clinical Trials on transcranial magnetic stimulation

3
Subscribe