Addressing Uncontrolled Diabetes in Primary Care: A Lifestyle Redesign Approach

March 23, 2020 updated by: Beth Pyatak, University of Southern California
This study is examining the feasibility of implementing an occupational therapy intervention addressing diabetes management in a primary care clinic within the Los Angeles County Department of Health Services (LAC-DHS), as well as the impact of this intervention approach on clinical outcomes, efficiency and patient-centeredness of care. This implementation science study is evaluating two emerging trends in healthcare delivery: (1) the integration of nontraditional providers into primary care medical home (PCMH) settings to facilitate the delivery of high-quality, comprehensive primary care while reducing the burden on physicians; and (2) the potential value of using occupational therapists to address chronic disease management in this setting

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

143

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90033
        • LAC+USC Primary Care Adult West Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Current patient at Los Angeles County-USC Medical Center Adult West Primary Care clinic
  • Diagnosed diabetes (type 1 or type 2) documented in EMR
  • Most recent HbA1c level >9.0% OR has not had an HbA1c measurement within past 12 months
  • Per provider judgment, would be willing to make lifestyle changes related to diabetes self-care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active, untreated substance use or behavioral health disorder which interferes with participation in major life activities

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
Participants will be invited to enroll in an occupational therapy (OT) lifestyle redesign intervention focused on diabetes management. The intervention includes approximately 8 one-hour OT sessions over 4 months.
Individualized lifestyle intervention incorporating the following topics: Diabetes knowledge; access to healthcare; communication with healthcare providers; incorporation of diabetes self-care tasks within daily habits and routines; social support; and emotional well-being. Participants receive approximately 8 hours of intervention by a licensed occupational therapist with training in diabetes education, motivational interviewing and the intervention protocol.
Other Names:
  • Resilient, Empowered, Active Living with Diabetes (REAL)
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual Care Control
Participants will not be contacted; outcome data will be extracted from medical records.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in the daily rate of change of Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) during the year prior to baseline, compared to the period from baseline to post-intervention
Time Frame: all measures taken from one year prior to baseline, to immediately post-intervention (an average of 4 months)
Measure of average blood glucose concentration over approximately the previous 12 weeks. HbA1C is measured periodically, as prescribed by study-independent provider.
all measures taken from one year prior to baseline, to immediately post-intervention (an average of 4 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life (ADD-QoL) at post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, an average of 4 months
19-item survey measure assessing impact of diabetes on social, physical, and emotional functioning.
Baseline, an average of 4 months
Difference in the daily rate of change of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) during the year prior to baseline, compared to the period from baseline to post-intervention
Time Frame: all measures taken from one year prior to baseline, to immediately post-intervention (an average of 4 months)
9-item survey measure assessing severity of depressive symptoms. PHQ-9 is measured at each study-independent clinic visit for patients who screen positive on the PHQ-2 (score >2).
all measures taken from one year prior to baseline, to immediately post-intervention (an average of 4 months)
Change from baseline in Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) at post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, an average of 4 months
14 items assessing diet, physical activity, medication adherence and other self-care behaviors relevant to diabetes.
Baseline, an average of 4 months
Change from baseline in Medication adherence scale at post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, an average of 4 months
3-item self-report medication adherence scale designed by Ira B. Wilson, Yoojin Lee, Joanne Michaud, Floyd J. FowlerJr., and William H. Rogers
Baseline, an average of 4 months
Change from baseline in Appraisal of Diabetes Scale at post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, an average of 4 months
7-item self-report scale assessing the individual's appraisal of his or her diabetes
Baseline, an average of 4 months
Change from baseline RAND 20-Item Short Form Survey (SF-20) at post-intervention
Time Frame: Baseline, an average of 4 months
The SF-20 is a 20-item set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures.
Baseline, an average of 4 months
Acceptability
Time Frame: Months 11-12
Both formative and summative data will be gathered throughout the study to assess acceptability, defined herein as the perception of the intervention as agreeable/satisfactory. Acceptability will be assessed through interviews.
Months 11-12
Appropriateness
Time Frame: Months 0-2, 3-10, and 11-12
Both formative and summative data will be gathered throughout the study to assess appropriateness, defined herein as the perceived relevance or compatibility of the intervention in the practice setting. Appropriateness will be assessed through interviews.
Months 0-2, 3-10, and 11-12
Feasibility
Time Frame: Months 0-2, and 11-12
Both formative and summative data will be gathered throughout the study to assess feasibility, defined herein as the extent to which the intervention can be successfully used in a practice setting. Feasibility will be assessed through surveys.
Months 0-2, and 11-12
Fidelity
Time Frame: Months 0-2, 3-10, and 11-12
Both formative and summative data will be gathered throughout the study to assess fidelity, defined herein as the extent to which the intervention is implemented as intended. Fidelity will be assessed through score on fidelity checklist.
Months 0-2, 3-10, and 11-12
Efficiency
Time Frame: Months 0-2 and 11-12
Both formative and summative data will be gathered throughout the study to assess efficiency, defined herein as the degree to which providers work to the "top of license". Efficiency will be assessed through interviews.
Months 0-2 and 11-12
Timeliness
Time Frame: Months 11-12
Both formative and summative data will be gathered throughout the study to assess timeliness, defined herein as the availability of appointments when needed. Timeliness will be assessed through staff documentation records.
Months 11-12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 18, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

September 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SC CTSI Grant #UL1TR001855
  • UL1TR001855 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Lifestyle Redesign

3
Subscribe