The Effect of Entecavir Consolidation on Post-TDF Treatment Durability

October 14, 2017 updated by: vghtpe user, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Clinical relapse occurred much earlier and tended to be more severe after cessation of TDF than ETV. The follow-up interval and intensity would be different between ETV and TDF after discontinuation of therapy. Whether switch therapy from TDF to ETV can modify the pattern of relapse is interesting but unclear. Our hypothesis is that entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment patients reduce and delay the clinical relapse effectively. Hence in this proof of concept study we would like to evaluate the effect of 6 months and 12 months of entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment durability.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Long term nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NAs) treatment is required in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). According to current treatment guidelines from APASL 2015, NAs treatment can be stopped if, after HBsAg loss following either anti-HBs seroconversion or at least 12 months of a post-HBsAg clearance consolidation period or after treatment for at least 2 years with undetectable HBV DNA documented on three separate occasions, 6 months apart. In Taiwan, the National Health Insurance system only reimburse 3 years NAs for CHB patients. Previous study from Jeng et al. suggested that the 1-year rate of clinical relapse (HBV DNA>2,000 IU/mL plus ALT>2X ULN) after cessation of entecavir(ETV) therapy by APASL stopping rule (treatment >2 years, HBV DNA undetectable >1 year) in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B(CHB) patients was 45%, of which 25.6% occurred within 6 months. Recently, another study from Jeng et al showed that 34 HBeAg(-) patients who stopped TDF therapy by APASL stopping rule were followed-up every 1-3 months for >6 months. Of these 34 patients, mean age was 51.8 years, 82.4% were males and 14(41.2%) were cirrhotic. The 1-year cumulative clinical relapse rate was 46%, of which 93.3% occurred within 6 months, and 13.3% developed decompensation. Clinical relapse occurred much earlier and tended to be more severe after cessation of TDF than ETV. The follow-up interval and intensity would be different between ETV and TDF after discontinuation of therapy. Whether switch therapy from TDF to ETV can modify the pattern of relapse is interesting but unclear. Our hypothesis is that entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment patients reduce and delay the clinical relapse effectively. Hence in this proof of concept study we would like to evaluate the effect of 6 months and 12 months of entecavir consolidation on post-TDF treatment durability.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

156

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • >20 yrs old.
  • No history of Lamivudine or telbivudine resistance.
  • HBsAg positive for more than 6 months.
  • HBeAg (-).
  • HBeAg-negative CHB under TDF treatment for mora than 2 years and fulfilled APASL 2012 guideline's stopping rule: HBeAg (-): undetectable HBV DNA on 3 separate occasions at least 6 months apart.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lamivudine/telbivudine resistance.
  • HBeAg (+).
  • HIV, HCV co-infection.
  • Under immunosuppressant treatment (including steroid and biologics).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: OTHER
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm 1
0.5mg Entecavir QD for 6 months after cessation of TDF and clinical observation for up to 6 months after the end of study follow-up.
0.5mg Baraclude (entecavir) QD for 6 months after cessation of TDF.
0.5mg Baraclude (entecavir) QD for 12 month after cessation of TDF.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Arm 2
0.5mg Entecavir QD for 12 months after cessation of TDF and clinical observation for up to 6 months after the end of study follow-up.
0.5mg Baraclude (entecavir) QD for 6 months after cessation of TDF.
0.5mg Baraclude (entecavir) QD for 12 month after cessation of TDF.
NO_INTERVENTION: Arm 3
No consolidation arm and observation only and clinical observation for up to 6 months after the end of study follow-up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical relapse rate.
Time Frame: Up to 24 months.
Clinical relapse rate (HBV DNA>2000 IU/ml and ALT> 2x ULN) within 6 months after cessation of TDF or ETV consolidation treatment (up to 6 or 12 months on post-TDF therapy).
Up to 24 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of ATL flare
Time Frame: Up to 24 months.
Severity of ATL flare (ALT>5X and 10X) within 6 months after cessation of TDF or ETV consolidation treatment (up to 6 or 12 months on post-TDF therapy).
Up to 24 months.
Liver decompensation incidence
Time Frame: Up to 24 months.
Liver decompensation incidence (Total bilirubin > 2mg/dl and/or PT prolongation> 3 sec) within 6 months after cessation of TDF or ETV consolidation treatment (up to 6 or 12 months on post-TDF therapy).
Up to 24 months.
Renal function changes
Time Frame: Up to 24 months.
Renal function changes based on eGFR (monitor per 3m) within 6 months after cessation of TDF or ETV consolidation treatment (up to 6 or 12 months on post-TDF therapy).
Up to 24 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

April 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 14, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Hepatitis B

Clinical Trials on 0.5mg Baraclude(entecavir)

3
Subscribe