Behavioral Insomnia of Childhood: Impact of Parent Education

October 25, 2017 updated by: Marmara University

Associates and Natural Course of Behavioral Insomnia of Childhood: Impact of Parent Education

Behavioral Insomnia of Childhood (BIC) is among the most prevalent problem presented to pediatricians with a reported occurrence of approximately 30% worldwide.The most widely applied treatment strategies for BIC in infants comprise behavioral procedures such as unmodified extinction; graduated extinction (ignoring the infant cries with minimal checks), or camping out. Unfortunately, breastfeeding is usually considered as an undesirable sleep association in these strategies. Moreover, less is known regarding the effects of these interventions on breastfeeding outcomes. The cued care is defined as a pattern of care characterized by sensible caregiver responsiveness, which meets the need underlying the infant's cues in a flexible manner. In this context, POSSUMS has been developed as a cued care sleep intervention, which is quite different from the conventional sleep training techniques. In the current study, investigators hypothesized that mothers receiving the cued care sleep intervention would report less sleep problems in their infants. Secondary outcomes included improvement in maternal mood and maintenance of the breastfeeding during the observation period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Behavioral Insomnia of Childhood (BIC) is among the most prevalent problem presented to pediatricians with a reported occurrence of approximately 30% worldwide.Like all the other behavioral problems, sleep problem is defined by the the parents, and influenced by parental psychopathology, parenting styles, family dynamics, culturally-based differences in values, socio-economic factors, temperament, developmental stage and medical condition of the child. Moreover, there is also data suggesting an association of depressed mood among mothers to infants with BIC. The most widely applied treatment strategies for BIC in infants comprise behavioral procedures such as unmodified extinction; graduated extinction (ignoring the infant cries with minimal checks), or camping out. The primary outcomes of these interventions include enabling infants to learn to self soothe to sleep, having less fragmented night-time sleep and longer night-time sleep periods. Unfortunately, breastfeeding is usually considered as an undesirable sleep association in these strategies. Moreover, less is known regarding the effects of these interventions on breastfeeding outcomes. Within the infant sleep research field, not breastfed but the formula fed baby is usually considered as the biological norm. However, since nursing influences both the maternal and infant sleep architecture, the outcomes of those behavioral interventions can not be accurately evaluated without considering the breastfeeding.

The cued care is defined as a pattern of care characterized by sensible caregiver responsiveness, which meets the need underlying the infant's cues in a flexible manner. In this context, POSSUMS has been developed as a cued care sleep intervention, which is quite different from the conventional sleep training techniques. This method uses the breast to make the baby go back to sleep as quickly as possible as long as the mother is happy with breastfeeding at night.

In the current study, investigators hypothesized that mothers receiving the cued care sleep intervention would report less sleep problems in their infants. Secondary outcomes included improvement in maternal mood and maintenance of the breastfeeding during the observation period.

The first part of the study was a baseline assessment of sleep problems. Software generated random number table was used to randomly allocate subjects to intervention and usual care groups. Mother-infant dyads in both groups were reassessed 3 months post intervention.

225 consecutive mother-infant dyads were assessed for eligibility at Marmara University Medical School, well- child outpatient clinic, Istanbul between 01 February 2016 and 15 April 2016. Seven did not meet the inclusion criteria, and 35 participants declined to participate. 91 were allocated to usual care, and 92 were allocated to patient education. Twenty five participants from the usual care and 1 mother infant dyad from the intervention group were lost to follow up and 157were included in the final analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

157

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 1 year (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • infants' gestational age ≥37 weeks, healthy with normal birth weight (≥2.5 kg),and absence of any neonatal or postnatal medical condition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • premature infants, infants with acute or chronic medical condition

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Educational care derived from POSSUMS
Intervention group were offered a sleep education session using behavioral change counseling communication skills, derived from the POSSUMS approach developed by Douglas P and Whittingham K. However we could not use Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), because none of the investigators had sufficient training on ACT at the time the study was conducted.
Intervention group were offered a sleep education session on healthy practices for parent-baby sleep which included information on sleep needs, sleep hygiene, training in strategies to remove obstacles that get in the way of healthy sleep. Information were provided to guide the parent in forming an action plan based on cued care which included aligning the circadian clock with real time, removing the obstacles that get in the way of healthy sleep, physical activity, mindfulness, and relaxation techniques for mothers derived from the POSSUMS approach. However, we could not use Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, because none of the investigators had sufficient training on ACT at the time the study was conducted.
NO_INTERVENTION: Usual Care
General anticipatory guidance given

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of infant sleep problems
Time Frame: 3 months
Infant sleep problems reported by the mother and according to Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire (BISQ). It is not a scale. The variables of the questionnaire included 1) nocturnal sleep duration (between the hours of 7 pm and 7 am); 2) daytime sleep duration (between the hours of 7 am and 7 pm); 3) number of night wakenings; 4) duration of wakefulness during the night hours (10 pm to 6 am); 5) nocturnal sleep-onset time (the time when the child falls asleep for the night); 6) settling time (latency to falling asleep for the night); 7) method of falling asleep; 8) location of sleep; 9) preferred body position; 10) age of child; 11) gender of child; 12) birth order; and 13) role of the responder who completed the BISQ. If the child woke up more than 3 times per night, spent more than 1 hour in wakefulness during the night, or spent less than 9 hours in sleep (day and night), then they were considered as poor sleepers
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Breastfeeding rates
Time Frame: 3 months
Infant breastfeeding rates
3 months
Maternal depression
Time Frame: 3 months
Mothers' depressive symptoms measured by Beck depression scale. The Beck depression Inventory is a 21 item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression. The highest possible total score for the test is sixty three. The score between 11-16 indicates mild mood disturbance, 17-20 borderline clinical depression, 21-30 moderate depression, 31-40 severe depression, over 40 extreme depression
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Perran Boran, Marmara University Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 30, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

Clinical Trials on Educational care derived from POSSUMS

3
Subscribe