Systematic Sampling of Lymph Nodes vs. Lymphadenectomy According to Intraoperative Frozen Pathology for Pulmonary Invasive Adenocarcinoma With Ground-glass Opacity

December 15, 2017 updated by: Chang Chen, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

A Prospective and Multi-center RCT Study of Lymphadenectomy Based on Intraoperative Frozen Pathology for Pulmonary Invasive Adenocarcinoma Presenting With Ground Glass Opacity

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of systematic sampling of lymph nodes vs. lymphadenectomy on outcome according to intraoperative frozen pathology for pulmonary invasive adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity (GGO) after VATS lobectomy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

On HRCT screening, early lung adenocarcinoma often contains a nonsolid component called ground-glass opacity (GGO). In 2011, pulmonary adenocarcinomas were classified into atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (AAH), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), minimally invasive carcinoma (MIA) and more extensively invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC) [1]. Early adenocarcinomas with GGO-dominant always mean low-grade malignancy and have an extremely favorable prognosis [2-5]. Previous studies have shown that patients with AAH, AIS and MIA have excellent survival rates (5-year survival rate is approximate 95%) after resection, and only 0.83% - 2.91% patients have lymph node metastasis [6-9]. At present, lymphadenectomy is always undergone in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma with ground-glass opacity. However, for MIA patients (especially in T1a-b stage), the appropriate use of lymphadenectomy continues to be debated.

Nowadays, intraoperative frozen pathology is widely used during operation. However, whether sampling of lymph nodes or lymphadenectomy should be performed for GGO lesions according to intraoperative pathological diagnosis is unclear. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate whether there are any trends regarding the impact of subtypes of invasive adenocarcinoma according to intraoperative frozen pathology in sampling of lymph nodes vs. lymphadenectomy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. A peripheral nodular lesion;
  2. The maximum diameters of whole GGO lesions and solid components on lung windows were no more than 3 cm (T1 stage);
  3. VATS lobectomy
  4. 25%≦Consolidation/Tumor ratio ≦50%
  5. ECOG performance status 0-2;
  6. Without distant metastasis;
  7. Intraoperative frozen pathology confirmed invasive or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma.
  8. No operation contraindication
  9. Cardiovascular: Cardiac function normal
  10. Renal: Creatinine clearance greater than 60 ml/min
  11. The expected survival after surgery ≥ 6 months
  12. Must be able to sign written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age less than 18 years old
  2. Known hereditary bleeding disorder with history of post-operative hemorrhage
  3. Patients maintained on chronic anticoagulation (eg Coumadin therapy)
  4. Known hematogenous disorder
  5. Known primary or secondary malignancy
  6. Pregnant or breast-feeding women;
  7. Clinically significant heart disease;
  8. Patients who are unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures;
  9. Receiving immunosuppressive therapy;
  10. HIV/AIDS.
  11. Multiple lesions in lung

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lymphadenectomy
systematically Lymphadenectomy of the lymph-node stations ATS 2, 4, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the right side and ATS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the left side
Routine lymph nodes dissection in lung cancer
Experimental: systematic sampling of the lymph nodes
systematic sampling of the lymph-node stations ATS 2, 4, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the right side and ATS 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,10,11 on the left side
Systematic Sampling of lymph nodes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence-free survival
Time Frame: five years after surgery
recurrence-free survival status of patients after surgery
five years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: five years after surgery
survival status of patients after surgery
five years after surgery
Morbidity rate
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
the rates of complications related to treatment during perioperative period
up to 30 days after surgery
Mortality rate
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
the rates of death related to treatment during perioperative period
up to 30 days after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 8, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 28, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHDC12015116

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymph Node Excision

Clinical Trials on lymphadenectomy

3
Subscribe