Neuropsychiatric Factors (Diapepsy)

December 20, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Impact of Cognitive, Psychological and Psychiatric Factors in Pathogenesis of Diabetic Foot and Recurrence : Study in Diabetic Patients

It is estimated that approximately 20-25% of diabetic patients will have at least one trophic disorder during their period. The appearance of a trophic disorder in a diabetic patient is a serious complication, indicating that diabetes is often complicated. The consequences are serious for the patient with an impairment of his quality of life, but also for society with a high cost in terms of health care costs.

It should also be noted that diabetes remains the main cause of non-traumatic amputation in most developed countries, with amputation often preceded by a trophic disorder. In addition, 20% of amputees are re-amputated at least once a year. Thus, the consequences of diabetic foot injuries are important in human, social and health terms and are the subject of increased health care spending.

Many studies have shown that diabetes is a risk factor for dementia, whether it is Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease or the vascular component or pure vascular dementia.

However, an understanding of the cognitive mechanisms involved in the management of diabetes and in particular in the diabetic foot and its recurrence remains partial and no study has integrated the severity of the risk of the foot (evaluated by the podological risk) Specific implication of some Cognitive abilities, especially in relation to episodic memory, and social cognition integrating decision-making abilities. These specific disorders could have a major impact in diabetes follow-up, therapeutic adherence and the risk of developing recurrent trophic disorders.

Thus, the coexistence of diabetes with a mental pathology makes the management of the subject more complex and exposes it to more complications.

In the management of chronic diabetic disease, adherence to treatment is essential. It is therefore important to detect the specific effects of this type of personality on the prognosis of diabetes and the appearance of foot wounds.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

It is estimated that approximately 20-25% of diabetic patients will have at least one trophic disorder during their. The occurrence of a trophic disorder in a diabetic patient is a serious complication, indicating a diabetes often complicated. The consequences are severe for the patient with an alteration of his quality of life, but also for society with a high cost in terms of healthcare costs.

It should also be pointed out that diabetes is still the leading cause of non-traumatic amputation in most developped countries, with amputation often preceded by a trophic disorder. Further, 20% of amputees are re-amputed at least once a year. Thus the consequences of the wounds of the diabetic foot are important on the human, social and health level and are the subject of an increase of the health expenses.

Many studies have shown that diabetes is a risk factor for dementia whether it is Alzheimer's disease, Alzheimer's disease with vascular component or pure vascular dementia.

However, an understanding of the cognitive mechanisms involved in the management of diabetes and in particular in the diabetic foot and its recurrence remains partial and no study has integrated the severity of the foot risk (evaluated by the podological risk ) and the specific involvement of certain cognitive abilities, in particular in relation to episodic memory, and social cognition integrating decision-making abilities. These specific disorders could have a major implication in the follow-up of diabetes, in the therapeutic adherence and in the risk of developing recurrent trophic disorders.

Thus, the coexistence of diabetes with a mental pathology makes the management of the subject more complex and exposes it to more complications.

In the management of chronic diabetic disease, adherence to treatment is essential. It is therefore important to detect the specific effects of this type of personality on the prognosis of diabetes and the occurrence of foot wounds.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

266

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Sylvain ARTERO, PhD

Study Locations

      • Montpellier, France, 34295
        • Recruiting
        • Uhmontpellier
        • Contact:
          • Ariane SULTAN, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

133 diabetic subjects with foot wounds and 133 diabetic subjects without foot wounds

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

"Diabetic subjects with foot wounds"

  • Subjects over 45 years old
  • Diabetic type 1 or type 2 with foot wound (podological risk grade 3) in hospitalization in the Nutrition-Diabetes Unit CHU Lapeyronie or in the Department of Metabolic Diseases CHRU Grau du Roi.
  • Having given their informed consent for the study

"Diabetic subjects without a foot wound"

  • Subjects over 45 years old
  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetics without a foot wound or previous foot wound (grade 0 to 2 grade, including Charcot foot) hospitalized or seen for consultation in the Nutrition-Diabetes Unit LaUyronie CHU or Metabolic Diseases CHRU Grau of the King.
  • Having given their informed consent for the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who can not complete the self-questionnaires or can not carry out the cognitive tests (blindness, non-French speaking patient, illiteracy)
  • Major physical or neurosensory problems that may interfere with the tests

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Diabetic Type 1 or Type 2 with foot wound
Type 1 or type 2 diabetic patients with hospitalization for foot wounds having an interview with a neuropsychologist or a physician trained in neuropsychological assessments
Maintenance of approximately 1h30 with a neuropsychologist or a physician trained in neuropsychological assessments in Diabetic Type 1 or Type 2 with foot wound hospitalization and Diabetic Type 1 or Type 2 without a foot wound or antecedent Of foot wound (podological risk grade 0 to 2, including foot of Charcot)
Diabetic Type 1 or Type 2 without a foot wound or antecedent
Type 1 or Type 2 diabetic patients with no foot wounds or history of foot wounds having an interview with a neuropsychologist or a physician trained in neuropsychological assessments
Maintenance of approximately 1h30 with a neuropsychologist or a physician trained in neuropsychological assessments in Diabetic Type 1 or Type 2 with foot wound hospitalization and Diabetic Type 1 or Type 2 without a foot wound or antecedent Of foot wound (podological risk grade 0 to 2, including foot of Charcot)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measuring memory
Time Frame: 1 day

The test of Rappel libre/Rappel indicé à 16 items (RL/RI 16) : memory measure

  • Range : min :0 max:16
  • better or worse outcome according the population studied (age, education) (no cut off scores)
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measuring memory
Time Frame: 2 years after the hospitalization

The test of Rappel libre/Rappel indicé à 16 items (RL/RI 16) : memory measure

  • Range : min :0 max:16
  • better or worse outcome according the population studied (age, education) (no cut off scores)
2 years after the hospitalization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of cognition by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: 1 day

Measures of cognition by the realization of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)

  • Range min :0 max 30
  • Score < or = 24 : cognitive disorders This test will be performed over 1 day during hospitalization
1 day
Weschler Cognition Measures
Time Frame: 1 day
Weschler Cognition Measurements This test will be performed over 1 day during hospitalization
1 day
Measurement of cognition by the EMPAN direct and indirect
Time Frame: 1 day

Measurement of cognition by the EMPAN direct and indirect EMPAN direct : Range : 1-8 and no cut off score EMPAN indirect : Range : 1-8 and no cut off score

This test will be performed over 1 day during hospitalization

1 day
Measurement of cognition by the Trail Making A (TMTA) and Trail Making B (TMTB)
Time Frame: 1 day
Measurement of cognition by the TMTA and TMTB Trail Making A : Range : 0-26 and no cut off score Trail Making B : Range : 0-13 and no cut off score This test will be performed over 1 day during hospitalization
1 day
Measurement of cognition by the phonemic verbal fluence
Time Frame: 1 day
Measurement of cognition by the phonemic verbal fluence This test will be performed over 1 day during hospitalization
1 day
Measurement of cognition by the semantic verbal fluence
Time Frame: 1 day
Measurement of cognition by the semantic verbal fluence This test will be performed over 1 day during hospitalization
1 day
Measurement of cognition by the phonemic verbal fluence
Time Frame: 2 years after the hospitalization
Measurement of cognition by the phonemic verbal fluence
2 years after the hospitalization
Measurement of cognition by the semantic verbal fluence
Time Frame: 2 years after the hospitalization
Measurement of cognition by the semantic verbal fluence
2 years after the hospitalization
Measurement of cognition by the the Trail Making A (TMTA) and Trail Making B (TMTB)
Time Frame: 2 years after the hospitalization

Measurement of cognition by the TMTA and TMTB

Trail Making A : Range : 0-26 and no cut off score Trail Making B : Range : 0-13 and no cut off score

2 years after the hospitalization
Measurement of cognition by the empan direct and indirect
Time Frame: 2 years after the hospitalization
Measurement of cognition by the EMPAN direct and indirect EMPAN direct : Range : 1-8 and no cut off score EMPAN indirect : Range : 1-8 and no cut off score
2 years after the hospitalization
Weschler Cognition Measures
Time Frame: 2 years after the hospitalization
Weschler Cognition Measurements
2 years after the hospitalization
Measurement of cognition by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: 2 years after the hospitalization

Measures of cognition by the realization of Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)

  • Range min :0 max 30
  • Score < or = 24 : cognitive disorders
2 years after the hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ariane SULTAN, PR, University Hospital, Montpellier

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 7, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 7, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 7, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

NC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Neuropsychological assessments

3
Subscribe