Modulated Electro-Hyperthermia Plus Chemo-radiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients in South Africa (mEHT)

November 3, 2017 updated by: Jeffrey Kotzen

A Phase III Randomised Trial Investigating the Benefits of the Addition of Modulated Electro-hyperthermia to Chemo-radiation for Cervical Cancer in HIV Positive and Negative Women in South Africa

This is a phase III randomised clinical trial. The aim is to investigate the clinical effects of the addition of modulated electro-hyperthermia (mEHT) to standard treatment protocols (chemoradiotherapy, CRT) for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) positive and negative locally advanced cervical cancer patients (LACC). SAMPLE: The investigators aim to enrol 236 HIV negative and HIV positive women with LACC, FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique) Stages IIB (distil) to stage III. Participants will be randomly assigned to a control group (N=118) and a study group (N=118). METHODOLOGY: Randomisation is based on age, stage and HIV. Participants from both groups will receive the standard treatment for cervical cancer at the hospital at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital in South Africa: Up to three doses of 80mg/m2 cisplatin, administered three weeks apart; 50Gy external beam radiation (EBR) in fractions of 2Gy; Three doses of 8Gy High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The study group will have two 55 minute mEHT treatments per week, at 130W, directly before the EBR using the EHY 2000 Device. OUTCOMES: 1) Determine the local disease control after treatment at 6 months using a Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and computerised tomography (CT) scans. 2) Determine the progression-free survival (PFS) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the last treatment date. PFS will be assessed in all registered participants, regardless of completion (Intent to Treat-ITT) as well as only in the subset of participants who complete the prescribed CRT. 3) Overall survival at two years will be assessed. 4) To evaluate the adverse events associated with mEHT. 5) The effect of mEHT on chemotherapy and radiotherapy tolerability and toxicity will be evaluated. 6) The quality of life of enrolled participants will be assessed before, at 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 months after completion of therapy using the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) and EuroQoL forms. 7) To evaluate the economic viability of the addition of mEHT to standard treatment protocols for LACC. 8) The effect, if any, of mEHT treatments on the HIV disease status of HIV positive patients will be assessed by the presence of Autoimmune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) defining illnesses before and after treatment. 9) The cancer recurrence patterns will be described and compared in all the participants.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

236

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Gauteng
      • Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 2163
        • Recruiting
        • Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jeffrey A Kotzen, MBBCH
          • Phone Number: +27825747385
        • Contact:
          • Carrie A Minnaar, Masters
          • Phone Number: +27721234292

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants (who have been adequately clinically staged by standard clinical guidelines) with biopsy proven primary, untreated, histologically confirmed invasive squamous and aden-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix, FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique) stages advanced IIB (invasion of the distal half of the parametrium), IIIA and IIIB.
  2. HIV positive participants will be accepted.
  3. The following laboratory tests will be done prior to enrolment in the study and the values must be in the following ranges:

    • Haemoglobin >10 g/dL;
    • Platelet count >150/mm3;
    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >3000/mm3
    • Creatinine clearance>60 mL/min
    • Liver function tests
  4. Females between the ages of 18 and 70 years.
  5. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
  6. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of not more than 2.
  7. Participants of childbearing potential must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test prior to enrolment and use an effective form of contraception (e.g. barrier contraception, highly effective hormonal contraception).
  8. At the investigators' discretion, participants must be suitable for treatment with radical intent using concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation. Subjects who undergo emergency RT in the form of brachytherapy for haemostasis, prior to enrolment will be allowed to be screened and enrolled provided they meet all other eligibility criteria.
  9. Life expectancy of greater than 12 months.
  10. Participants must have a body mass index (BMI) that is within normal ranges.

    -

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants who have undergone hysterectomy.
  2. Exclude para-aortic lymph involvement on planning CT (without contrast)
  3. Patients with life-threatening AIDS defining illnesses (other than cervical carcinoma) will be excluded, as will patients with a CD4 count < 200/µL and not on ARVs.
  4. Patients with acute active (such as tuberculosis or malaria), serious, uncontrolled infections will be excluded.
  5. Participants will be excluded if there is evidence of resistance to antiretroviral therapy (i.e. HIV viral load > 400 copies/mL despite combination antiretroviral therapy for at least 4 months).
  6. Prior invasive malignancy other than cervical cancer, diagnosed within the past 24 months, excluding in situ anal dysplasia or carcinoma in situ, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, or Kaposi's sarcoma that has not required systemic chemotherapy within the past 24 months.
  7. Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  8. A medical or psychiatric illness that prevents the participant from being able to sign an informed consent or would affect the participant's ability to comply with the protocol stipulations.
  9. Participants with circumstances that will not permit completion of the study or required follow-ups. For instance if travel to and from treatment site is an issue.
  10. Participants with carcinoma of the cervical stump.
  11. Participants with a history of cardiovascular disease manifested as

    1. History of myocardial infarction
    2. Unstable angina
    3. Currently taking medication for treatment of angina
    4. History of coronary artery bypass surgery
  12. Participants with contraindications to modulated electro-hyperthermia treatment:

    1. Pace makers and other implanted devices which rely on current and charges.
    2. Large metal implants, such as hip replacements.
    3. Inability to feel temperature in the region.
    4. Inability to express or vocalise discomfort or heat at the treatment site.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study
50 Gy external beam radiation administered in fractions of 2 Gy 3 Doses of 8 Gy High Dose Rate brachytherapy up to 3 doses of 80mg/m2 of Cisplatin 10 modulated electro-hyperthermia treatments (55 minutes at a maximum of 150W)
Other Names:
  • Chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • Radiotherapy
Modulated electro-hyperthermia device used is the EHY 2000 by Oncotherm GmbH
Other Names:
  • Oncothermia
  • Nanothermia
High Dose Rate
Other Names:
  • Radiation therapy
Active Comparator: Control
50 Gy external beam radiation administered in fractions of 2 Gy 3 Doses of 8 Gy High Dose Rate brachytherapy up to 3 doses of 80mg/m2 of Cisplatin
Other Names:
  • Chemotherapy
Other Names:
  • Radiotherapy
High Dose Rate
Other Names:
  • Radiation therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Local Disease Control
Time Frame: 6 months post treatment
Assessed by PET/CT using the RESIST/PERSIST criteria: complete response, complete metabolic response, partial response, stable disease, progressive disease.
6 months post treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: 24 months post treatment

To determine the progression-free survival (PFS) at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after the last treatment date.

  1. Determine PFS in all registered participants, regardless of completion (Intent To Treat-ITT)
  2. Determine PFS in the subset of participants who complete the prescribed chemo-radiotherapy
24 months post treatment
2 Year Survival
Time Frame: 24 months post treatment
Determine the overall survival at two years and the cause of death (i.e. cancer-related, HIV-related, treatment related or other).
24 months post treatment
Incidence of Adverse Events Attributed to mEHT as assessed by CTCAE version 4.0
Time Frame: 6 months post treatment
To evaluate the adverse events that can be directly attributed to mEHT treatments.
6 months post treatment
Incidence of Treatment Related Adverse Events Attributed to Cisplatin as assessed by CTCAE version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 3 months post treatment completion
The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events which can be attributed to Cisplatin in each arm will be compared in order to identify any potential effect of mEHT on the frequency and severity of adverse events attributed to Cisplatin.
Up to 3 months post treatment completion
Number of participants with Early Treatment Related Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 6 months post treatment completion
The incidence of early toxicity symptoms (graded using the CTCAE version 4 criteria) associated with radiotherapy in each arm of the study will be compared to identify any potential effect of the mEHT on the incidence and severity of early toxicity.
Up to 6 months post treatment completion
Number of participants with Late Treatment Related Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE version 4.0
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
The incidence of late toxicity symptoms (graded using the CTCAE version 4 criteria) associated with radiotherapy in each arm of the study will be compared to identify any potential effect of the mEHT on the incidence of late toxicity in the sample group.
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Visual Analogue Scale On the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline value at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Visual Analogue Scale on the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Mobility On the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline value at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of Mobility on the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Self-Care On the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline value at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of Self-Care on the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Usual Activities On the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline value at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of Usual Activities on the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Pain/Discomfort On the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline value at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of Pain/Discomfort on the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Anxiety/Depression On the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline value at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of Anxiety/Depression on the EuroQoL EQ-5D-5L form
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Global Health Status
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Global Health Status
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Physical Functioning
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Physical Functioning
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Role Functioning
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Role Functioning
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Emotional Functioning
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Emotional Functioning
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Cognitive Functioning
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Cognitive Functioning
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Social Functioning
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Social Functioning
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Fatigue
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Fatigue
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Nausea and Vomiting
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Nausea and Vomiting
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Pain
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Pain
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Dyspnoea
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Dyspnoea
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Insomnia
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Insomnia
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Appetite Loss
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Appetite Loss
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Constipation
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Constipation
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Diarrhoea
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Diarrhoea
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Financial Difficulties
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Financial Difficulties
Up to 24 months post treatment completion
Score on the EORTC-QLQ 24 for Symptom Experiences
Time Frame: Up to 24 months post treatment completion
To evaluate the changes from baseline scores at set time points (6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months,18 months, 24 months) of the Score on the EORTC-QLQ 30 for Symptom Experiences
Up to 24 months post treatment completion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carrie A Minnaar, Msc, Student - PhD Candidate
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey A Kotzen, MBBCH, Senior Radiation Oncologist
  • Study Chair: Ans Baeyes, PhD, Head of Department of Radiobiology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 9, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2017

Last Verified

November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trials on Cisplatin

3
Subscribe