Iron Deficiency Anemia, Iron Supplementation and Genomic Stability in Infants

Effectiveness of Weekly and Daily Iron Supplementation for the Prevention of Iron-deficiency Anemia in Infants. Impact on Genomic Stability

This study compares weekly versus daily administration of iron for prevention of anemia in 6 months old infants. One third of the infants that are exclusively breast fed will not receive iron, the second third will receive iron weekly and the last third will receive iron daily. Half of the infants that take infant formula will receive iron weekly and the other half will receive iron daily.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Iron deficiency is the most prevalent nutritional deficiency and the main cause of anemia. It's estimated that 43% of pre-school children worldwide are anemic, in Argentina a national survey carried out in 2007 (last survey), showed that 34.5% of children less than 2 years old were anemic and that 50.8% of children 6 to 9 months old were anemic. Although there is a consensus on iron supplementation as a preventive strategy for anemia in infants, there is a poor adherence due mainly to mild gastrointestinal adverse effects and low prescription rates from pediatricians. On the other hand, the excess of iron can lead to genomic instability with structural and functional alterations on proteins, lipids and DNA. Weekly administration of iron has been proposed as an alternative of similar efficacy and higher effectiveness in older children and pregnant women, but sufficient evidence for infants is lacking.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

204

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Buenos Aires
      • La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1900
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto de Desarrollo e Investigaciones Pediátricas Prof. Dr. Fernando E. Viteri
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 3 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 3 months old infants, clinically healthy, born to term (>37 weeks), that weighted at birth between 2500 and 4000 g, that have normal prenatal records.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • anemic or iron deficient infants, or that have a chronic pathology, or that have undergone an acute pathology in the previous 15 days. Children that are receiving antibiotics or vitamin supplements.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Weekly Iron
Weekly ferrous sulfate: one dose (4mg/kg/week).
Drops
Other Names:
  • Fer-in-sol
Active Comparator: Daily Iron
Daily ferrous sulfate: one dose (1 mg/kg/day). Maximum daily dose: 40 mg
Drops
Other Names:
  • Fer-in-sol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anemia
Time Frame: 7 days
Hemoglobin <11.0 g/dL in 6 months old infants.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Iron deficiency
Time Frame: 7 days
Serum Ferritin <12 ng/ml in 6 months old infants. If C-reactive protein > 5 mg/L, Iron deficiency is redefined as Serum Ferritin <30 ng/ml.
7 days
Adverse effects
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Frequency of at least one of the following during the three months intervention: rejection of food intake, constipation, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Genomic Instability
Time Frame: 15 days

One of the following indicators is altered. Genomic damage: Comet assay: damage index (ID) over 200 cells. 8-oxo-dGuanosine.

Oxidative Stress: catalase activity, superoxide dismutase activity, Tbars.

15 days
Adherence
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Low adherence: 1. Less than 50% of the drug was given to the infant (according to the remaining volume of the drug in its recipient) 2. Less tha 50% of the allocated intakes (according to care-taker registration on an almanaq)
Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Ana Varea, Biochemist, Instituto de Desarrollo e Investigaciones Pediátricas Prof. Dr. Fernando E. Viteri

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 30, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 3 months following article publication. No end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.Proposals should be directed to enriqueflmartins@gmail.com To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Iron-deficiency

Clinical Trials on Weekly Ferrous Sulfate

3
Subscribe