Safety and Efficacy Study of rhPTH(1-84) in Subjects With Hypoparathyroidism

September 30, 2022 updated by: Shire

An Open-label Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of rhPTH(1-84) in Subjects With Hypoparathyroidism

This study is open to adults with hypoparathyroidism who complete the SHP634-101 study (PARALLAX Study). The purpose of this study is to see if rhPTH(1-84) is safe and effective in adults with hypoparathyroidism who previously participated in the SHP634-101 study. All participants enrolled in this study will receive rhPTH(1-84) once-daily for 52 weeks via an injection.

Patients who complete the SHP634-101 study will have the option to screen for this extension study.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G2
        • CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval
    • Ontario
      • Oakville, Ontario, Canada, L6M 1M1
        • Bone Research and Education Centre
      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus Universitetshospital
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1083
        • Semmelweis Egyetem
      • Pécs, Hungary, 7624
        • Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem, I. sz. Belgyogyaszati Klinika
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky Medical Center
    • Louisiana
      • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
        • Crescent City Clinical Research Center, LLC
    • Nevada
      • Reno, Nevada, United States, 89511-2060
        • Northern Nevada Endocrinology - Lisa Abbott MD
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107-6810
        • Thomas Jefferson University, Jefferson Rheumatology Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • An understanding, ability, and willingness to fully comply with study procedures and restrictions
  • Ability to voluntarily provide written, signed, and dated informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Previously completed the SHP634-101 (NCT02781844) study, including the 30-day follow-up.
  • Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female subjects who agree to comply with applicable contraceptive requirements of the protocol or females of non-childbearing potential.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received investigational study drug, aside from that received in study SHP634-101 (NCT02781844), within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
  • Presence or history of a clinically significant disorder involving the cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, gastrointestinal, immunologic, hematologic, endocrine (with exception of the condition under study), or neurologic system(s) or psychiatric disease, that in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for this study.
  • Received parathyroid hormone (PTH), PTH analog, or parathyroid hormone fragment 1-34 [PTH(1-34)] treatment within the last 30 days from the screening visit.
  • Subjects with a history of parathyroid hormone intolerance, based on investigator determination.
  • Any disease that might affect calcium metabolism or calcium-phosphate homeostasis as determined by the investigator other than hypoparathyroidism, including but not limited to, active hyperthyroidism; poorly controlled insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus; severe and chronic cardiac, liver or renal disease; Cushing's syndrome; neuromuscular disease such as rheumatoid arthritis; myeloma; pancreatitis; malnutrition; rickets; recent prolonged immobility; active malignancy, bone metastases or a history of skeletal malignancies; primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism; a history of parathyroid carcinoma; hypopituitarism, acromegaly; or multiple endocrine neoplasia types 1 and 2 .
  • Subjects who are at increased baseline risk for osteosarcoma such as subjects with Paget's disease of bone or unexplained elevations of alkaline phosphatase, young adult subjects with open epiphyses, subjects with hereditary disorders predisposing to osteosarcoma or subjects with a prior history of external beam or implant radiation therapy involving the skeleton.
  • Use of the following medications prior to administration of investigational product within:

    1. 30 days-loop diuretics, lithium, systemic corticosteroids (medical judgment is required by the investigator. Primarily high doses of systemic corticosteroids [example (eg), prednisone] should be excluded. Stable doses of hydrocortisone [eg, as treatment for Addison's disease] may be acceptable).
    2. 3 months-cinacalcet hydrochloride
    3. 6 months-fluoride tablets, oral bisphosphonates, methotrexate, growth hormone, digoxin
    4. 12 months-intravenous bisphosphonates, drug or alcohol abuse, as determined by the investigator
  • Presence of any clinically significant results from laboratory tests, vital signs assessments, or electrocardiograms (ECG), that in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for this study.
  • Any medical condition or prior therapy that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for this study.
  • History of a clinically significant illness during the 4 weeks prior to dosing, that in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for this study.
  • History of any clinically significant surgery or procedure within 8 weeks of first dose, as determined by the investigator or expected to undergo a major surgical procedure during the trial.
  • History of an allergic response(s) to PTH, PTH analogs, or PTH(1-34), or other clinically significant allergies, that in the opinion of the investigator, would make the subject unsuitable for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: rhPTH(1-84)
Participants will receive rhPTH(1-84) subcutaneous (SC) injection in the thigh (alternate thigh every day) once daily (QD) of an escalating dose from 50 microgram (mcg) to a maximum of 100 mcg increased in increments of 25 mcg no more frequently than every 2 to 4 weeks, with the goal of achieving or maintaining albumin-corrected serum calcium (ACSC) levels in the range of 2-2.25 millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (8.0-9.0 milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]). Once a participant achieves a stable ACSC (2-2.25 mmol/L [8.0-9.0mg/dL]) and has minimized supplement doses, they will be maintained at that dose of rhPTH(1-84). If ACSC is greater than (>) 2.25 mmol/L (>9.0 mg/dL), a starting dose of 25 mcg will be administered.
Participants will receive rhPTH(1-84) SC injection in the thigh (alternate thigh every day) QD.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Total Albumin-corrected Serum Calcium (ACSC) Values Greater Than or Equal to (>=) to the Range of 7.5 mg/dL (1.875 mmol/L) and Less Than or Equal to (<=) Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) at Week 24
Time Frame: At Week 24
Percentage of participants who achieved ACSC values >= to range of 1.875 mmol/L and <= ULN at Week 24 was reported.
At Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Total ACSC Values >= to the Range of 7.5 mg/dL (1.875 mmol/L) and <=ULN at Week 52 (End-of-treatment [EOT])
Time Frame: At Week 52 (EOT)
Percentage of participants who achieved ACSC values >= to range of 1.875 mmol/L and <= ULN at Week 52 (EOT) was reported.
At Week 52 (EOT)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital abnormality/birth defect, and is an important medical event. TEAEs were defined as AEs with a start date on or after the first dose of investigational product or a start date before the date of the first dose of investigational product that increased in severity or after the date of the first dose.
From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Clinical Laboratory Values
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Clinical laboratory assessment included hematology, serum chemistry, urine chemistry and urinalysis. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator based upon the out of range values of standard range set for each parameter. Any changes in clinical laboratory results which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator was reported.
From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Sign
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Vital sign parameters included: temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator based upon the out of range values of standard range set for each parameter. Any changes in vital signs which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator was reported.
From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Twelve-lead ECGs was performed in triplicate with a minimum 2-minute gap between traces. The participant rested in the supine position for at least 5 minutes before collecting the ECG. Assessment of ECG parameters included: heart rate, RR interval, PR interval, QRS interval, QT interval, and QTc interval. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator based upon the out of range values of standard range set for each parameter. Any change in ECG assessments which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator was reported.
From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Values
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
eGFR was calculated using the chronic kidney disease epidemiology (CDK-epi) formula. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator based upon the out of range values of standard range set for parameter. Any change in eGFR assessments which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator was reported.
From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Serum Creatinine Value
Time Frame: From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
eGFR was assessed by measuring serum creatinine. Serum creatinine level was obtained directly from laboratory results. Clinical significance was judged by the investigator based upon the out of range values of standard range set for parameter. Any change in serum creatinine assessments which were deemed clinically significant by the investigator was reported.
From start of study drug administration to end of study (Week 56)
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Parathyroid Hormone Antibodies at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Number of participants with positive anti-parathyroid hormone antibodies at Week 24 was reported.
Week 24
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Parathyroid Hormone Antibodies at Week 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Week 52 (EOT)
Number of participants with positive anti-parathyroid hormone antibodies at Week 52 (EOT) was reported.
Week 52 (EOT)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Albumin Corrected Serum Calcium (ACSC) Concentration at Weeks 24 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52 (EOT)
Change from baseline in ACSC concentration at Weeks 24 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 24 and 52 (EOT)
Change From Baseline in Serum Phosphate Concentration at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT)
Change from baseline in serum phosphate concentration at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT)
Change From Baseline in ACSC-phosphate Product at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT)
Change from baseline in ACSC-phosphate product at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT) was reported. Here "mmol^2/L^2" is abbreviated as millimoles square per liter square.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40 and 52 (EOT)
Change From Baseline in 24-hour Urine Calcium Excretion at Weeks 16, 32 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 16, 32 and 52 (EOT)
Change from baseline in 24-hour urine calcium excretion at Weeks 16, 32 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 16, 32 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Prescribed Supplemental Oral Calcium Dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (End of Study [EOS])
Time Frame: Baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (EOS)
Percentage change from baseline in prescribed supplemental oral calcium dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (EOS) were reported.
Baseline and at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (EOS)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Prescribed Supplemental Active Vitamin D Dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (EOS)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (EOS)
Percentage change from baseline in prescribed supplemental oral calcium dose at Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (EOS) were reported.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 52 (EOT) and 56 (EOS)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage change from baseline in serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Serum Osteocalcin at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage change from baseline in serum osteocalcin at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Procollagen 1 N-Terminal Propeptide at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage change from baseline in procollagen 1 N-terminal propeptide at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen C-Telopeptides at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage change from baseline in type I collagen C-telopeptides at Week 8, 24 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage Change From Baseline in Type I Collagen N-Telopeptides at Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)
Percentage change from baseline in type I collagen N-telopeptides at Week 8, 24 and 52 (EOT) was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 8, 24 and 52 (EOT)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 26, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHP634-404
  • 2017-003067-36 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoparathyroidism

Clinical Trials on rhPTH(1-84)

3
Subscribe