Xeomin Cosmetic in the Management of Masseter

December 13, 2017 updated by: Erevna Innovations Inc.

Prospective Evaluation of Xeomin Cosmetic in the Management of the Masseter Using Two Different Injection Techniques

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two injection techniques in the management of masseteric hypertrophy using Xeomin Cosmetic.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Xeomin Cosmetic has been used previously in the management of masseteric hypertrophy. However, a standardized injection technique has not been established. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two injection techniques in the management of masseteric hypertrophy using Xeomin Cosmetic.

Methods: Thirty female patients with masseteric hypertrophy were recruited and evenly randomized to receive bilateral treatments of either 1) a single injection technique (SIT), or 2) a multi-injection technique (MIT). Improvement of masseteric hypertrophy was assessed at Week 16 using standardized measurements and photographs. Patients completed a 5-point satisfaction questionnaire while physicians the global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) and 10-point photonumeric masseter prominence rating scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At the time of consent, women over the age of 18 years old.
  2. Patients with established hypertrophy of the masseters, palpable and visible.
  3. Accepted the obligation not to receive any other facial procedures through the 6-month follow-up.
  4. Understood and accepted the obligation and would be logistically able to appear for all scheduled follow-up visits.
  5. No previous facial fillers for a period of 6 months prior to this study.
  6. No previous facial fillers along the jawline for 18 months
  7. Capable of providing informed consent.
  8. No previous botulinum toxin type A treatment for masseteric hypertrophy in the last 12 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current Pregnancy or lactation
  2. Hypersensitivity to Xeomin
  3. Generalized disorders of muscle activity (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert Eaton syndrome)
  4. Presence of infection at the site of injection
  5. Inability to comply with follow-up and abstain from facial injections during the study period
  6. Patients with a score of 2 or greater on the Merz Aesthetics Scale for the Jawline

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: single injection technique (SIT)
40 U of Xeomin Cosmetic delivered directly into the region where the three masseter heads overlap.
Xeomin Cosmetic is the purest commercially available botulinum toxin type A available to date. It has been approved by Health Canada since 2012 for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines.
EXPERIMENTAL: multi-injection technique (MIT)
A distribution of 40 U (8 U distributed in 5 different areas) of Xeomin Cosmetic over the width of the masseter while respecting the upper limit of the anterior border of the masseter and the inferior insertion of the masseter. The injections are separated by a 1cm distance and the dose is equally distributed across these sites.
Xeomin Cosmetic is the purest commercially available botulinum toxin type A available to date. It has been approved by Health Canada since 2012 for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Metric masseteric hypertrophy improvement outcomes between SIT and MIT at 16 weeks in comparison to baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks
The difference in physician assessed efficacy using standardized masseter improvement measurements between two different injection techniques at 16 weeks (visit 4) in comparison to baseline (visit 2).
Baseline to 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Masseter photo-numeric aesthetic rating scales between SIT and MIT at 16 weeks in comparison to baseline.
Time Frame: Baseline to 16 weeks
Face shape and masseteric prominence rating
Baseline to 16 weeks
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline to 20 weeks
Baseline to 20 weeks
Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale
Time Frame: Baseline to 20 weeks
Baseline to 20 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to 20 weeks
Baseline to 20 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 31, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 11, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy

Clinical Trials on Xeomin Cosmetic

3
Subscribe