Physiological Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Anti-reflux Surgery

August 20, 2019 updated by: Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Oesophageal Manometry and Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Anti-reflux Surgery

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is a common condition, where acid from the stomach leaks up into the oesophagus (gullet) and causes symptoms such as heartburn and an unpleasant taste in the back of the mouth. GORD can often be controlled with self-help measures and medication. Occasionally, surgery to correct the problem may be needed.

A laparoscopic fundoplication is a keyhole (laparoscopic) procedure which is a highly effective treatment. Although reflux-related symptoms are absent or well controlled in over 85% of patients at 5 years after the operation, younger patients may have higher expectations that such an operation would hopefully last decades.

Oesophageal physiology tests such as 24-hour catheter pH (potential of hydrogen) and impedance involve passing a small tube into oesophagus via patients' nose to monitor the presence of stomach content (acid or non-acid) in the oesophagus. The manometry test measures the pressures and coordination of pressure activity within the oesophagus. Bravo™ wireless pH monitoring uses a capsule that is attached to the oesophageal lining. These tests are often used as part of a pre-operative evaluation before anti-reflux surgery (ARS).

Several measurements in these tests (also called parameters) could potentially anticipate clinical outcomes following anti-reflux surgery. The evidence for parameters like duration of acid exposure, number of reflux episodes and association with symptoms, pressures and co-ordination of pressure activity in the oesophagus, came from studies which were not designed in the most rigorous way to determine whether a cause-effect relation exists between treatment and outcome.

This is a single centre, retrospective, observational study in which patients who had pre-operative physiology testing and anti-reflux surgery at a tertiary centre in the last 10 years will be assessed for reflux symptoms and quality of life over the phone, based on three validated questionnaires. The study is designed to evaluate correlations between oesophageal physiology parameters and symptomatic response to ARS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a single centre, retrospective, cross-sectional study on patients who had anti-reflux surgery and pre-operative oesophageal physiology testing over 10 years. The investigators anticipate the recruitment of up to 350 subjects over 18 months.

Eligible patients will be contacted over the phone and asked whether they would be interested in joining the study. Candidates will be presented with details no less than the exact nature of the study, the implications and constraints of the protocol. Subjects will be made aware that no intervention will be made in this study, therefore taking part involves no risks or side effects. If all questions that satisfy inclusion and exclusion criteria are answered satisfactorily, and patients are happy to enter the study, participants will be consented verbally over the phone. It will be stated that the participant is free to withdraw from the study at any time for any reason without prejudice to future care, and with no obligation to give the reason for withdrawal.

Once recruited the following assessments and interventions will take place:

  1. Patients will be assessed based on the Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) which is designed to assess the frequency and severity of heartburn, regurgitation and dyspeptic symptoms. Response options are scaled as Likert-type with scores for and severity. RDQ demonstrated validity and reliability in multiple languages and represents a viable instrument for assessing symptom severity and response to treatment.
  2. Patients will also be assessed based on The Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI) questionnaire which evaluates the presence and severity of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). RSI can be completed in less than one minute. It is easily administered, highly reproducible and demonstrated design- and criteria-based validity in multiple languages.
  3. Participants will finally be evaluated based on the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GORD-HRQL) questionnaire which is aimed at typical reflux symptoms and impact on the daily living. The questionnaire can be easily given over the phone in less than 2 minutes. GORD-HRQL has been validated and is a reliable and practical tool in several languages.
  4. Data recorded will include the standard components of pre-operative oesophageal pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry, reflux symptoms scores, PPIs (proton pump inhibitors) usage, post-operative physiology studies and re-do anti-reflux surgery.
  5. Statistical analysis will involve multiple logistic regression and multiple linear regression models. Sensitivity and specificity of each predictor will be measured using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A minimum of 350 patients for 5 predictors will define our sample size.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

343

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux confirmed on physiology testing and treated with anti-reflux surgery at a single tertiary centre over 10 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and non-pregnant females over the age of 18 years.
  • Gastro-oesophageal symptoms in accordance with Montreal criteria49
  • Patients who had oesophageal physiology testing at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Oesophageal manometry based on Chicago classification
  • 24-hour standard pH, impedance-pH and Bravo™
  • Minimum 6 months post ARS and follow-up at GSTT
  • Verbal consent over the phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients less than 18 years of age.
  • Pregnancy at the time of interview
  • Patients unable to comprehend or answer the questionnaires
  • Oesophageal physiology tests performed in other centres

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reflux Disease Questionnaire (RDQ) score improvement ratio after anti-reflux surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
≥ 50% improvement in RDQ scores is considered a successful outcome
1 day
Reflux Symptoms Index (RSI) threshold score after anti-reflux surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
RSI score after anti-reflux surgery
1 day
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GORD-HRQL) threshold scores after anti-reflux surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
GORD-HRQL score after anti-reflux surgery
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dosage of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) per day after anti-reflux surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
Compare dosage of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) per day pre- and post anti-reflux surgery
1 day
Number of patients requiring re-do anti-reflux surgery
Time Frame: 1 day
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Terry Wong, MA MD, Consultant Gastroenterologist, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 5, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 19, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

January 4, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms questionnaires

3
Subscribe