- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03401723
A Validation Study of a Computerized Movement Analysis of the Colonoscope in Simulated Colonoscopy (3D-CoPS)
A Validation Study of the 3D-CoPS and 3D-CoRS and Its Relationship With an International Acknowledged Assessment Tool (ETS) in Simulated Colonoscopy
A cross validation study comparing an international acknowledged assessment tool "Endoscopy Training System" (ETS) and movement analysis of the colonoscope based on raw data from coils within the scope.
24 physicians are recruited and divided based on experience (novices and experienced). All participants are to perform twice on the ETS that is based on four tasks; Scope manipulation, tool targeting, loop management and mucosal inspection. The movement of the colonoscope will be gathered during the tasks and correlated to the scores of the ETS.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
24 physicians are recruited on a voluntarily basis, and will be divided into two groups, based on experience;
- 12 Novices (0-50 colonoscopies)
- 12 Experienced (> 140 colonoscopies). The groups are to perform twice on the Endoscopy Training System that is based on four tasks; Scope manipulation, tool targeting, loop management and mucosal inspection. Data for 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score (3D-CoRS) will be gathered during the task of mucosal inspection and data for 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score (3D-CoPS) are collected during loop management.
Novice group:
Any physician who has no experience of endoscopies or has done no more than 50 colonoscopies.
Experienced group:
Includes any physician who have succeeded more than 140 colonoscopies. Professional backgrounds include surgeons and gastroenterologists.
Demographic data will gathered from all three groups as follows:
- Age
- Sex
- Speciality
- Total number of colonoscopies
- Total number of colonoscopies the last year
- Time since graduation
- Experience in simulated endoscopy/colonoscopy The Endoscopy Training System is a simulation system and an assessment tool and includes five different performance metrics and a scoring system. The system is used in combination with an Olympus colonoscope (Olympus Medical Systems Corp. Tokyo, Japan).
Performance metrics:
- Scope Manipulation (SM) - The use of torque and tip deflection to move a shape in the colon to the 6 o´clock position and align the same shape within an outline placed upon the monitor screen. Before continuing to the next shape, alignment must be held for 5 seconds.
- Tool Targeting (TT) - 10 targets located around the colon must be found. With a biopsy forceps, each target has to been touched for at least 5 seconds before moving to the next target.
Loop Management (LM) - The management of a standard alfa-loop. If during insertion from anus until cecum a loop is formed, it must be first recognised and then unlooped successfully to continue advancing the colonoscope.
The Colonoscopy Training Model begin in the left lateral position, but on request, the model can be repositioned in the supine, prone, or right lateral decubitus position. On request, abdominal pressure can be provided when directed by the participant.
- Mucosal Inspection (MI) - Randomly placed polyps inside the rubber colon have to be found during withdrawal, requiring inspection and retroflexion in the rectum.
- Retroflexion (RF) - 5 targets located around the anus must be found. With a biopsy forcep, each target has to been touched while the colonoscope is retroflexed in the rectum and touched for at least 5 seconds before moving to the next target.
The 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score (3D-CoPS) and the 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score (3D-CoRS) are movement analysis. Electromagnetic coils are built in along the length of the Olympus colonoscopes. They generate a pulsed low-intensity magnetic field that is picked up a receiver coil. The data-points for each coil are inserted into an algorithm for movement analyzing. This analysis is done as a change between the tip of the scope, and the next tracked magnetic coil. The result is a relative movement of the colonoscope in relation to the previous position, and how much the movement is deflected according to the direction the tip points in. This movement analysis is used for distinction between the progression- and retraction phase, and as the basis for the 3D-CoPS and 3D-CoRS analysis, which is essential, such that the 3D-CoRS measurements is performed during withdrawal of the colonoscope.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
- Copenhagen Acedemy of Medical Education and Simulation
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Physicians
Exclusion Criteria:
- Non physicians
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Other: Novices
Any physician who has no experience of endoscopies or has done no more than 50 colonoscopies. Each subject included are to perform on the Endoscopy Training System (ETS) during which data for 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score and 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is gathered. |
3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.
Other Names:
The Endoscopy Training System is based on the Colonoscopy Training Model platform and includes four different performance metrics and a scoring system.
Other Names:
3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.
Other Names:
|
Other: Experienced
Includes any physician who have succeeded more than 140 colonoscopies. Professional backgrounds include surgeons and gastroenterologists. Each subject included are to perform on the ETS during which data for 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score and 3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is gathered. |
3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.
Other Names:
The Endoscopy Training System is based on the Colonoscopy Training Model platform and includes four different performance metrics and a scoring system.
Other Names:
3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score is a computerized analysis of the movement of the colonoscope based on data from coils within the colonoscope.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from anus until max insertion(cecum).
It is scaled from 0-1000 .A score of zero equals an incomplete procedure and a score of 1 is a very poor score but the cecum was reached.
Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.
|
3 months
|
3D-Colonoscopy Retraction Score
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The score is based on a movement analysis of the colonoscope from cecum to the anus.
It is scaled from 0-1000.
A score of zero equals a very poor score, Increasing score represents better technical performance with a maximum score of 1000.
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Relationship to other variables
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Scores from the ETS, 3D-CoPS and 3D-CoRS will be correlated.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Lars Konge, Prof, CAMES-Rigshospitalet
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ritter EM, Cox TC, Trinca KD, Pearl JP. Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation (SCOPE): a non-computer-based tool for assessment of endoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4073-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3063-8. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
- Trinca KD, Cox TC, Pearl JP, Ritter EM. Validity evidence for the Simulated Colonoscopy Objective Performance Evaluation scoring system. Am J Surg. 2014 Feb;207(2):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3D-CoPS and 3D-CoRS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Education
-
Sakarya UniversityRecruiting
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Istinye UniversityActive, not recruitingEducation | Newborn; Vitality | Breastfeeding EducationTurkey
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingCancer Education | Spanish Language Cancer EducationUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedBariatric Surgery Candidate | Education | Patient EducationTurkey
-
Liverpool John Moores UniversityUniversity of Central Lancashire; Queen's University, Belfast; Newcastle University and other collaboratorsCompletedMedical Education | Health Education | Educational AssessmentUnited Kingdom
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedBlood Pressure Determination | Continuing Nursing Education | Education, DistanceEgypt
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkWithdrawnEducation, Professional | Ultrasound Simulation | Simulation-based Medical Education
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiAmbulatory Pediatric AssociationCompletedCommunication | Education, Medical | Education, Competency-Based | Feedback | HumanismUnited States
-
Francisco Javier Navarro MoyaAndaluz Health ServiceUnknownHealth Education | Blood Coagulation Tests | Patient Education as TopicSpain
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkDanish Child Cancer FoundationTerminatedEducation | Interprofessional Education | Continuing Professional Development | Case-based LearningDenmark
Clinical Trials on 3D-Colonoscopy Progression Score
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkTechnical University of DenmarkCompleted
-
Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and SimulationBispebjerg Hospital; Danish Cancer Society; Herlev Hospital; Region Capital Denmark and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingHealthy | Colorectal Cancer
-
National Taiwan University HospitalRecruiting
-
San Luigi Gonzaga HospitalCompletedKidney Neoplasms | Carcinoma, Renal CellItaly
-
Centro de Educación Medica e Investigaciones Clínicas...RecruitingInflammatory Bowel DiseasesArgentina
-
National Medical Research Center for Children's...RecruitingAortic Valve InsufficiencyRussian Federation
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx | Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx | Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity | Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx | Stage III Verrucous Carcinoma of the Larynx | Stage III Verrucous Carcinoma... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Rennes University HospitalCompletedAortic Valve StenosisFrance
-
University of IowaNot yet recruitingDelirium | Spinal Fusion | Pain, Back | Thoracolumbar Interfascial Plane BlockUnited States
-
Madigan Army Medical CenterUnknownLow Back Pain | Myofascial Pain Syndrome Lower BackUnited States