Per-operative Ultrasonographic Assessement of the Placement of the Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacral Colpo/Hysteropexy (SONOMESH)

November 6, 2020 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Evaluation of Intraoperative Ultrasound for the Positioning of Prostheses in Laparoscopic Surgery of Genital Prolapse

This study is conducted in order to determinate the faisability of an intraoperative ultrasound to mesure the positioning of prostheses during laparoscopic promontofixation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Genital prolapse is a very common functional pathology that affects 30% of women. The functional impact of prolapse is highly variable and may lead patients to consider surgery. Surgery for laparoscopic genital prolapse (laparoscopy) is a common practice. The placement of prostheses on the anterior and posterior walls of the vagina is sort of "estimated", performed without any quality control . This technique is associated with a high rate of patient satisfaction (90% satisfaction), but a risk of anatomical recurrence in 20-30% of cases and a risk of reoperation for relapse in 3% of cases. It is likely that the lower the intervesico-vaginal prosthesis, the lower the risk of cystocele relapse is important.The postoperative ultrasound visualization of prostheses placed in promontofixation is possible: they appear hyperechoic. In particular, in anterior, where a prosthesis is placed between the vagina and the bladder, it is possible to verify that this prosthesis supports the entire bladder base.Thus, it may be possible to check the correct position of the prostheses intraoperatively. If studies were conducted postoperatively, to the best of our knowledge, no study has been conducted on the value of an intraoperative ultrasound control.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clamart, France
        • Xavier DEFFIEUX

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult women (>18 years-old)
  • patient who undergo laparoscopic sacral copopexy/hysteropexy
  • Affiliation to a public health insurance system
  • Written and informed consent given by the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, breast-feading
  • woan involved in an interventional research
  • Patient under tutorship or curatorship
  • Pregnancy and breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Intraoperative ultrasound
An ultrasound of the position of the prosthesis during surgery, under general anesthesia, is performed. A follow-up visit will be carried out 2 months (± 1 month) after the surgery as part of the usual care. An ultrasound of the position of the prosthesis is performed without anesthesia, either as part of the treatment or as part of the research. This measurement is performed without the intraoperative measurement by an independent sonographer.
An ultrasound of the position of the prosthesis during surgery, under general anesthesia, is performed. A follow-up visit will be carried out 2 months (± 1 month) after the surgery as part of the usual care. An ultrasound of the position of the prosthesis is performed without anesthesia, either as part of the treatment or as part of the research. This measurement is performed without the intraoperative measurement by an independent sonographer.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measure the distance (in mm) between the most distal part of the anterior prosthesis and the bladder neck.
Time Frame: at two months (± 1 month) of follow-up
Comparaison of intraoperative measurement to postoperative measurement
at two months (± 1 month) of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stage of prolapse
Time Frame: until 2 months post-operative
Evaluate the stage of prolapse on clinical examination according to the International Continence Society (ICS) of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q) classification (points Ba, Bp, C, D)
until 2 months post-operative
Evaluate the symptoms with the PFDI-20 questionnaire
Time Frame: during 2 months post-operative
The Pelvic Floor Disorders Inventory (PFDI-20) score : This is a questionnaire so that patients can answer questions about certain symptoms: intestines, bladder or pelvic
during 2 months post-operative
Evaluate patient satisfaction with the PGI-I questionnaire (1-7)
Time Frame: until 2 months post-operative
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) : The patient should check the box corresponding to the current state of her uro-gynecological problems compared to what they were before treatment
until 2 months post-operative
Evaluate the symptoms with the PFIQ-7 questionnaire
Time Frame: during 2 months post-operative
The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) : describe how much les activities, relationships, or feelings have been affected by symptoms bladder, bowel, or vaginal or conditions over.
during 2 months post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xavier DEFFIEUX, AP-HP, Antoine Béclère Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • K160801J

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on LAPAROSCOPY

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative ultrasound and 2 months post-operative ultrasound ( ± 1 month)

3
Subscribe