Popliteal Approach to Sciatic Nerve Block Is Not Inferior to Infragluteal Approach

January 18, 2018 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Popliteal Approach to Sciatic Nerve Block Provides Postoperative Analgesia That Is Not Inferior to That of the Infragluteal Approach in Patients Undergoing Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia

Study Hypothesis The investigators approach to demonstrate noninferiority of analgesia provided by popliteal block in TKA surgery will be based on a hypothesis of absence of a clinically significant difference in pain visual analogue sores (VAS) between the analgesia provided by the popliteal block and that of the infragluteal sciatic block in TKA surgery patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sciatic nerve block provides clinically significant analgesic benefits following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These benefits include a reduction in pain scores and decrease analgesic requirements.

Despite these benefits, sciatic nerve block has remained among the least performed peripheral nerve block by anesthesiologists. Some impediments relating to single shot sciatic nerve block (SSNB) that may cause anesthesiologists to avoid it include, patient discomfort due to needle passage through dense gluteal or thigh adipose and musculature, and unreliable success because of difficulty in localizing the sciatic nerve (particularly in obese patients).

Even in the current era of US guidance, sciatic nerve block remains a challenge. Despite its helpfulness, ultrasound technology remains hindered by an intrinsic limitation: a trade off between depth of penetration and image resolution; therefore, it works well for superficial blocks but becomes less useful when deep structures are imaged-ironically where this guidance is needed most. The challenge of anatomical depth, as in the case of the sciatic nerve, is one remaining challenge that dictates practical restrictions on the patterns of practice of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia.

Actually, the recommendations of the Joint Committee for Education and Training composed of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and the European Society of Regional Anesthesia cite the depth of block resulting in degradation of both ultrasound and needle image as the first among other causes that increase the level of difficulty of a nerve block.

As the sciatic nerve travels caudally in the body, it becomes more superficial with less thickness of tissue separating it from skin surface, making distal sciatic nerve block an attractive alternative. Indeed, both articular branches which provide sensory innervation to the knee joint as well as its muscular branches which provide innervation to the muscles surrounding knee joint most commonly arise from the sciatic nerve either at the knee level, or just above the knee or within the popliteal fossa.

Blockade of the sciatic nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa, commonly termed a popliteal block, is technically easier to perform than gluteal sciatic block and may even be associated with less risk of intravascular injection and nerve injury. Indeed, popliteal block has been reported to provide good postoperative analgesia in total knee replacement and other major knee surgery. However, the small posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh, which supplies only the skin on the back of the thigh and knee, separates from the sciatic nerve proximally and variably in the gluteal region, and will be spared in more distal approaches. It is for this reason why many practitioners are hesitant to perform distal sciatic nerve blocks for TKA. However, the relative importance of the posterior cutaneous nerve of the thigh for post-operative analgesia following TKA is unknown and maybe clinically insignificant.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • Toronto Western Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Scale I-III patients undergoing unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia and nerve blocks
  • Ages 18-85
  • BMI ≤ 38 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic pain disorders
  • Significant pre-existing neurological deficits or peripheral neuropathy affecting the lower extremity
  • Abuse of drugs or alcohol
  • Allergies to any medication included in the study protocol
  • Contraindication to spinal anesthesia or failure to institute spinal anesthesia after performing femoral and sciatic blocks
  • Bilateral TKA surgeries
  • History of significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: popliteal approach
Blockade of the sciatic nerve at the level of the popliteal fossa.

Popliteal approach:

Under ultrasound guidance a 50 to 90 mm 22 G needle is inserted in and advanced to contact the target nerve until nerve movement is detected. The end point of nerve block in this group is obtaining a circumferential local anesthetic spread around the sciatic nerve.

Active Comparator: infragluteal approach
Blocking the sciatic nerve at the subgluteal level.
Infragluteal approach: The patients in this group will receive sciatic bock according to the approach described by Chan et al. Ultrasound scanning will be used to identify and mark the greater trochanter laterally and the ischial tuberosity medially. The sciatic nerve is usually found anterior (deep) to the gluteus maximus muscle and lateral to the origin of the biceps femoris muscle at the ischial tuberosity as well as medial to the greater trochanter. The end point of nerve block in this group is obtaining a circumferential local anesthetic spread around the sciatic nerve.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue pain scores. The score at 6 hours will be considered as primary outcome.
Time Frame: 6 hours
Overall pain level as well as pain localized o the back of the knee will be assessed at rest and on movement (knee flexion) and will be quantified with a 100 mm VAS pain scale score, with 0 representing no pain and 100 representing the worst imaginable pain.
6 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensory/Motor block onset assesment in the sciatic nerve distribution
Time Frame: 60 minutes
The onset of sensory block will be assessed in the sciatic nerve distribution within 60 minutes of local anesthetic injection.
60 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Brull, MD, University of Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 11, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 11-0306-B

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromuscular Blockade

Clinical Trials on Popliteal approach

3
Subscribe