Connected Health Care in Exercise Program for Obesity

January 22, 2019 updated by: Regis Fernandes, Mayo Clinic

Feasibility and Explorative Study to Test the Superiority of Connected Health Care Using Wearable Device to Improve Body Composition and Fitness Level

Many kinds of wearable technology have become available, but the superiority of those devices in weight loss compared to the standard care without them is uncertain. The possible problems are long-term self-motivation, utility and validity of the device, and outcome measures in clinical trials. The connected health care with motivational interviewing as an intervention, and body composition parameters in addition to body weight as outcome measures are employed in the project. The expected outcome is that connected health care, which is more individualized approach by heath care professionals, is more effective compared to self-monitoring using wearable devices. Two types of wearable device are going to be used to monitor 1) body activity and 2) heart rate variables during exercise which reflect fitness level in this study in order to investigate appropriate monitoring parameters to predict outcome measures.

The hypothesis is that addition of connected health system will result in improvement of body composition and fitness level compared to self-monitoring.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients with age 18 to 59 years old and body mass index between 30 to 39.9 are to be enrolled at Mayo Clinic in Arizona. All enrolled subjects receive wearable monitoring devices with remote tracking capability and brochure regarding nutrition and physical exercise with basic instruction. Subjects are randomly assigned to connected health care group versus self-monitoring group. Connected health care group will have 2 interviews about physical exercise and 6 communications with individualized instruction and counseling of their exercise including the usage of the monitoring devices. Self-monitoring group will do physical exercise following the initial basic instruction and self-monitor them.

All subjects visit Mayo Clinic to get outcome measures at 0, 12, and 24weeks. Outcome measures will be compared before, at 12 weeks, and after the 24 weeks of the fitness program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 59 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Body Mass Index of 30 to <40 kg/m^2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • End of organ damage from hypertension
  • Diabetes
  • Liver disease
  • Chronic lung disease
  • Neuromuscular disease
  • Any conditions that limit exercise
  • Currently involved in other weight program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Connected Health
This group will get 2 interviews about physical exercise (exercise instruction with motivational interview) and 6 communications with individualized instruction and counseling of their physical exercise (investigators can access activity data and exercise log) including the usage of the monitoring device.
An activity tracker and a heart rate monitor to track the participants activity and exercise records will be used. In addition to the basic instruction of exercise and nutrition, an exercise physiologist provides individualized exercise instruction with a motivational interviewing skill, which is a different style from traditional persuasive style of communication between the healthcare professionals and patients.
Active Comparator: Self-Monitoring
This group will do physical exercise following the initial instruction and self-monitor them. Investigators can access activity data and exercise log but will not discuss with the subjects about the data.
An activity tracker and a heart rate monitor to track the participants activity and exercise records will be used. Basic instruction about exercise and nutrition is provided at the initial visit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Waist circumference
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Waist circumference is measured by tape at the end expiration while the patient is standing. Units centimeters.
Baseline and 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in weight
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Weight is measured using a commercially available body weight scale (TANITA body composition monitors). Units kg.
Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in body fat percentage
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Body fat percentage is measured using a commercially available body fat scale (TANITA body composition monitors). Units percentage.
Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in physical activity score
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

International Physical Activity Questionnaire is filled out by patients. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire Long Form (IPAQ) (www.ipaq.ki.se) is to assess levels and patterns of physical activity.

Continuous score expressed as "MET (metabolic equivalent)-min/week: MET level*minutes of activity/day*days per week" is calculated. Higher number means higher level of physical activity that a subject performed during last 7 days. The estimated range is from 0 to 3000. Units MET-minutes.

Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in Physical Activity Vital Sign
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks

Physical Activity Vital Sign (PAVS) (Greenwood JL, 2010) is a short physical activity assessment using closed ended questions to ask how many days a subject performed physical activity during the past week. Higher number means a subject spent more days on performing physical activity.

The range is from 0 to 7. Units days.

Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Veterans Specific Activity Questionnaire (VASQ) (Myers J, 2001) is a brief self administered questionnaire to predict exercise capacity (METs, metabolic equivalents). A subject select the minimum activity level that cause fatigue, short of breath, or discomfort. Higher number means higher fitness level of a subject. the range is from 1 to 13. Units METs.
Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in heart rate variables
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Heart rate recovery after 6 minute walk test is evaluated. Units beats/minute.
Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in 6 minute walk test
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Walking distance is evaluated. Units meters.
Baseline and 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Regis I Fernandes, Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 17-004529

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Exercise instruction with motivational interview

3
Subscribe