Floraseal Versus Iodine Impregnated Adhesive Drapes

July 18, 2019 updated by: Victor Hugo Hernandez, University of Miami

Prevention of Surgical Site Infections in Total Joint Arthroplasty: Iodine Impregnated Adhesive Drapes Versus Cyanoacrylate-Based Sealant

Infection after total joint arthroplasty can have devastating consequences. Adhesive drapes have been traditionally used at our institution to help reduce the risk of wound contamination and infection by superficial skin flora. Our primary objective is to determine if a cyanoacrylate-based sealant (FloraSeal microbial sealant) is superior to conventional iodine impregnated drapes in prevention of both superficial and deep surgical site infections in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. A prospective, randomized controlled model will be used to answer this question.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Demand for Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is increasing steadily and is projected to continue trending upwards in the coming years. Postoperative infections are a common but also potentially devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty.

Various strategies are employed both pre-operatively and post-operatively to prevent this complication. A 2011 Cochrane Review concluded that Iodine impregnated adhesive drapes had no impact on surgical site infection rate when used in various surgical procedures not specific to orthopaedics. The recent SSI prevention guidelines by the World Health Organization did not find any evidence to support the use of adhesive drapes during surgery and recommends against its use.

Currently, iodine impregnated adhesive drapes in conjunction with either chorahexadine gluconate or Iodine Povacrylex and Isopropyl Alcohol are the standard of care at our institution.

FloraSeal is a cyanoacrylate-based sealant. A cyanoacrylate microbial sealant minimizes endogenous bacteria spread to the surgical site by forming a sterile film bonded onto a patient's skin. This film, which is formed upon polymerization, prevents the spread of microorganisms. The protective mechanism is mechanical: the film traps and immobilizes microorganisms that survive on a patient's skin. It has been previously shown to effectively immobilize both gram positive and gram negative bacteria. Additionally, the sealant itself can effectively reduce the superficial bacterial burden on the skin surface and also helps reduce skin moisture buildup on skin.

Furthermore, with conventional adhesive drapes, the edges must be peeled back at the time of skin closure in order to effectively close the surgical site. It is at this moment that the incision becomes most vulnerable to penetration by local microorganisms. FloraSeal and other cyanoacrylate based sealants remain on the skin for 5 to 10 days until the superficial skin sloughs off.

Studies on sterile pig skin demonstrated FloraSeal to be more effective alone at immobilizing bacteria than incisional drapes. The efficacy was the same when FloraSeal was used with or without the incisional drapes, demonstrating that it may be used as a substitute.

Additionally, a 2013 retrospective study in revision shoulder arthroplasty demonstrated a potential reduction in positive intraoperative deep tissue cultures when using a cyanoacrylate-based microbial sealant versus the iodine impregnated incisional drapes. The study lacked sufficient power to reach significance, calling for further investigation of this effect.

Cyanoacrylate has been investigated in other surgical interventions. A 2008 prospective, randomized multicenter clinical trial in patients undergoing elective open hernia repair demonstrated cyanoacrylate-based microbial sealant independently reduced wound contamination over the course of the operation.

Due to the potentially devastating complications associated with postoperative infection, the investigators seek to find alternative methods of prevention of surgical site infection.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 18 years of age
  • Have signed the written informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not fluent in the language of the informed consent form
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnancy
  • Reported to have mental illness or belonging to a vulnerable population
  • History of dermatitis or allergic reaction to cyanoacrylate based materials or iodine
  • Patients undergoing revision total joint arthroplasty secondary to infection
  • Allergy to Iodine.
  • Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty in the setting of acute trauma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Floraseal
The surgical site will first be cleaned with isopropyl alcohol. Once the site is dry, alcohol based chlorhexidine gluconate preparatory solution will be applied to the surgical site. Once dry, the FloraSeal surgical preparatory solution will be applied per the manufacturers recommendations. The extremity will be draped in sterile fashion however adhesive drapes over the surgical site itself will not be applied.
FloraSeal is a cyanoacrylate-based sealant used in the prevention of surgical site infections.
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
The operative site is first cleaned with isopropyl alcohol. Once the site is dry, alcohol based chlorhexidine gluconate preparatory solution will be applied to the surgical site. The operative site will then be draped in sterile fashion. An iodine impregnated adhesive drape will then be applied to the surgical site.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Appearance of Surgical Site
Time Frame: 90 days from date of surgery
The surgical incision will be checked post-operatively for signs of infection or dehiscence.
90 days from date of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-operative cultures
Time Frame: Intra-operative - Cannot be clearly defined as it will depend on the duration of the surgical procedure.
Five wound cultures will be obtained at various points during the operation to test for contamination of the surgical site
Intra-operative - Cannot be clearly defined as it will depend on the duration of the surgical procedure.
Post-operative complication - Antibiotic administration
Time Frame: 90 days from date of surgery
Some surgical site infections may be managed with either intravenous or oral antibiotics. Both groups will be followed to see if either required antibiotic administration.
90 days from date of surgery
Post-operative complication - Re-operation
Time Frame: 90 days from date of surgery
Some surgical site infections require surgical debridement. Patients will be followed to determine which patients require re-operation.
90 days from date of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Victor H Hernandez, MD, University of Miami

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 22, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The researchers will share aggregate data but no individual's data will be shared. De-identified graphs of the accelerometer or range of motion output recordings from the devices may be used to illustrate the device's application.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgical Wound Infection

3
Subscribe