Remotely Guided Ultrasound Among Non-Medical Personnel To Assess Normal Lung Parenchyma

September 20, 2018 updated by: Sahar Ahmad, Stony Brook University
This study will assess the feasibility of remotely guided US use by individuals without ultrasound training to assess for normal lung parenchyma in healthy volunteers. The untrained operators (operators) will perform US examinations of lung under the guidance of a medical professional (professional) with experience in ultrasound technique. The professional will guide the operator step by step on how to conduct an US exam of the 'patient's' lung. Images will then be saved and reviewed at a later time by an ultrasound expert to determine quality and clinical functionality in recognizing normal lung parenchyma. This simulation will be analogous to an untrained US operator assessing a potentially ill patient with the assistance of a remotely located physician. An example of this would be an astronaut with respiratory distress after experiencing a rapid decompression event being evaluated by another healthy astronaut by US under the guidance of the flight surgeon at Mission Control.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Volunteers will meet with study personnel in the Clinical Skills Center at Stonybrook University. Informed consent will be obtained from all groups ('operators', 'patients', 'clinicians'). A survey will be conducted to evaluate the subjects' prior experience in ultrasound. Subjects who qualify will continue to participate in the study.

The 'patient' will initially be evaluated by US by an expert and 'ideal' images will be captured and stored for later comparison against those obtained by 'operators'.

The 'operator' will be given an smart phone/table with video communication function and will be connected with the US 'expert', who will be located in a different room, physically and audibly out of range. For the first portion of the study, the 'expert' will instruct the 'operator' on how to conduct an US exam limited to the lung. Using the two-way video and audio communication through the video communication application, the expert will guide to the operator on how to utilize the US machine, where to place the probe, and how to capture and save images. The 'patient' will be instructed not to assist the 'operator' in any way. For the second portion of the study, the 'operator' will utilize the US machine to conduct a similarly limited lung exam on themselves, again with the assistance of the 'expert' but no other study personnel.

Finally, the 'clinicians' will carry out similarly limited lung exams on the 'patient', first without instruction from the 'expert' and then again under similar guidance as the previous portions of the study.

During all portions of the study, time to image capture will be measured by observing personnel. All captured images will be sent to expert reviewers at which time a quality score will be generated. The score will be generated based off of the clinical utility of the image, general image quality, and several technical components of the image. Please see the accompanying Score Sheet for further details. Reviewers will be blinded as to the origin of the images ('operator' vs. 'clinician'). Scores obtained from 'operators' will be compared against those of 'clinicians'. Reviewers will be comprised of three experts in the field of US, all MDs who have received formal training in US and have at least 5 years of clinical US practice experience. Each captured image will be reviewed and scored by all three reviewers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

volunteers agreeable to consent to study and perform bedside ultrasound imaging

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • agreeable to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • refusal to consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
untrained
Volunteers untrained in bedside ultrasound technique
trained
Volunteers previously trained and experienced in bedside ultrasound technique
healthy volunteer
Standardized patient who will undergo ultrasound study
bedside ultrasound imaging of the lungs

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ultrasound Image Quality
Time Frame: 1 day
Ultrasound experts will blindly evaluate images obtained from both untrained and trained groups. Using the 'Ultrasound Quality Scorecard', evaluators will assess the quality of the image obtained and the technique carried out to obtain the image. These quality and technique criteria include 'Discernable Lung Parenchyma', 'Presence of A-lines', 'Lack of Obstruction from Rib Shadowing', 'Correct Probe Selection', Correct Depth Setting', 'Correct Gain Selection'. For each criterion (both quality and technique), a binary 'Yes/No' score will be given. Total 'Yes' scores will be summed for each ultrasound exam (minimum 0, maximum 6), with the higher number of 'Yes' responses signifying a higher quality ultrasound exam. Each ultrasound exam will be scored by three separate experts, with the average of the three scores being reported as the 'final score'.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sahar Ahmad, MD, Stony Brook University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1190543-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Volunteers

Clinical Trials on bedside ultrasound

3
Subscribe