Psychosocial Intervention for Older HIV+ Adults With HAND (IN-HAND)

September 29, 2023 updated by: University Health Network, Toronto

Cognitive Remediation Group Therapy to Improve Older Adults' Ability to Cope With HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND)

CTNPT 029 will test the feasibility and acceptability of cognitive remediation group therapy in older adults living with HIV who have been diagnosed with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). The cognitive remediation therapy will include tablet-based cognitive training and mindfulness-based stress reduction sessions.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Approximately half of the aging HIV-positive population will be affected by HAND, making cognitive impairment related to HIV a significant comorbidity in this population. With the development, access to, and early initiation of modern antiretroviral therapy (ART), HAND is less severe and less common than it once was. However, people who were treated with old therapies, ones that were less effective and with higher rates of toxicity compared to current regimens, or who experienced AIDS defining illnesses, may be affected by HAND more frequently and more severely. Issues with cognition, memory, processing new information, problem solving, and decision making are all potential symptoms.

Psychosocial interventions have been used to decrease stress and depression and improve coping and quality of life in the general aging population experiencing cognitive impairment and depression. These techniques, which can vary widely, have not been fully tested in people aging with HAND.

CTNPT 029 (a pilot trial funded by the CTN) seeks to enroll 16 people at St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto. Study participants will be randomized to either receive cognitive remediation group therapy (CRGT) or standard HIV group therapy (control group). Both group therapies consist of a series of weekly 3-hour sessions led by a certified social worker and a peer. The CRGT group will spend one hour per session on brain training exercises (PositScience Software) and the remaining two hours on mindfulness-based stress reduction (meditation, breathing exercises, etc.). The control group will focus on general health and wellbeing for people aging with HIV. Study investigators will determine the usefulness of the structure of the sessions and the feasibility and acceptability of performing a study of this kind.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2N2
        • University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4Y1Y5
        • AIDS Committee of Toronto (ACT)
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B1M4
        • St. Michael's Hospital Neurobehavioral Research Unit

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female; aged ≥ 40 years
  2. Documented HAND diagnosis of Mild Neurocognitive Disorder (MND)
  3. ≥ 5 years of HIV infection
  4. Provided consent to St. Michael's Hospital to be contacted for future research studies
  5. Can feasibly attend 8 weeks of group therapy in downtown Toronto

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Documented HAND diagnosis of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI) or HIV-associated dementia (HAD)
  2. Hospitalization within past 1 month
  3. Inability to communicate in English
  4. Inability to use a tablet
  5. Anyone deemed by the principal investigator to be disruptive to a support group setting

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive remediation group therapy
8 weekly 3-hour sessions of CRGT
Cognitive remediation group therapy (CRGT) will be comprised of 1/3 brain training exercises on tablets using PositScience software by BrainHQ and 2/3 mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) involving various activities such as meditation, breathing exercises, etc. Intervention will comprise of 8 weekly 3-hour sessions.
Active Comparator: Mutual aid support group
8 weekly 3-hour sessions of HIV group therapy
These groups use a model of mutual aid to encourage peer-based discussion on the effects of living with HIV. Topics are determined by the group; facilitators ensure that safety is maintained throughout and make connections between participants as appropriate. Intervension will comprise of 8 weekly 3-hour sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility - Session Attendance
Time Frame: Three months
Number of Participants who Attended at least 80% of the Group Sessions.
Three months
Acceptability - Participant Satisfaction With Group Sessions
Time Frame: Three months

Participants will complete the Helping Characteristics of Self-Help and Support Groups Measure that will be complemented by questions about session length, number of sessions, activities used, and evaluation of facilitators.

The Helping Characteristics of Self-Help and Support Group Measure contains 22 items that are scored on a 5-point-Likert style scale for a minimum score of 22 and a maximum score of 110. Higher scores indicate better outcome (outcome being satisfaction with support group). There are no subscales.

Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention fidelity - how closely facilitators adhere to intervention model
Time Frame: Three months
Facilitators of both study arms will submit weekly session reports. These reports will include checklists of the therapy components; use of an average 80% of components listed will be considered as good fidelity. These reports will also include open-ended questions about the sessions, including questions on group dynamics, challenges faced, and detail on activities used.
Three months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Stress
Time Frame: Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)
Assessed by the 'HIV/AIDS Stress Scale' at three time points. Score from 0 to 116. Lower scores mean better outcomes.
Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)
Sustained Use of Brain Training Activities
Time Frame: Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)
Self-report at three time points
Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)
Sustained Use of Mindfulness Strategies
Time Frame: Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21). Score from 0 to 26
Assessed by the 'Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire - Short Form' at three time points. Score from 24 to 120. Higher scores mean better outcomes.
Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21). Score from 0 to 26
Change in Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)
Assessed by the 'Anxiety in Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Scale' at three time points. Score from 0 to 26. Lower scores mean better outcomes.
Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)
Change in Coping
Time Frame: Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)
Assessed by the 'Coping Self-Efficacy Scale of Health Problems' at three time points. Score from 0 to 30. Higher scores mean better outcomes.
Baseline visit (week -1), follow-up visit (week 9), and end of study visit (week 21)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sharon L Walmsley, MD, University Health Network, Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 6, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

3
Subscribe