Study of BGB-A317 in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Mature T- and NK-cell Neoplasms

October 23, 2024 updated by: BeiGene

A Phase 2, Open-Label Study of BGB-A317 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Mature T- and NK-cell Neoplasms

This was a multi-center, prospective, non-randomized, open-label, Phase 2 clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BGB-A317 in participants with relapsed or refractory mature T- and natural killer (NK)-cell neoplasms. There were three cohorts:

  • Cohort 1: Relapsed or refractory (R/R) extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma (ENKTL; nasal or non-nasal type)
  • Cohort 2: Other R/R mature T-cell neoplasms, limited to the following histologies: peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL)
  • Cohort 3: R/R cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, limited to mycosis fungoides (MF) or Sèzary syndrome (SS)

Study procedures included a Screening phase (up to 35 days); Treatment phase (until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of informed consent, whichever occurs first); Safety Follow-up phase (up to 90 days following last study treatment for all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)); and Survival follow-up phase (duration varying by participant).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6
        • British Columbia Cancer Agency the Vancouver Centre
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
        • Peking University Third Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Beijing Hospital
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
        • Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center
    • Heilongjiang
      • Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150000
        • Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital
    • Henan
      • Zhengzhou, Henan, China, 450000
        • Henan Cancer Hospital
    • Jiangsu
      • Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China, 221000
        • The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200000
        • Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200092
        • Xin Hua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
        • West China Hospital, Sichuan University
    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300060
        • Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310022
        • Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
      • Caen cedex, France, 14033
        • Institut Dhematologie de Basse Normandie Chu Caen Normandie
      • PierreBenite, France, 69495
        • Chu Hopital Lyon Sud
      • Bergamo, Italy, 24127
        • Asst Papa Giovanni Xxiii, Medicina Trasfusionale Ed Ematologia
      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Policlinico Sorsola Malpighi, Aou Di Bologna
      • Genova, Italy, 16121
        • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Irccs Per L Oncologia, Divisione Ematologia Centro Trapianti Di Mid
      • Milano, Italy, 20132
        • Ospedale San Raffaele
      • Parma, Italy, 43126
        • Ospedale Maggiore, Ematologia E Centro Trapianti Midollo Osseo (Ctmo), Aou Parma
      • Pisa, Italy, 56126
        • Aou Pisana, Stabilimento Di Santa Chiara
      • Terni, Italy, 05100
        • Azienda Ospedaliera S Maria Di Terni
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 10048
        • National Taiwan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of relapsed or refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma (nasal or non-nasal type, peripheral T-cell lymphoma - not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic large cell lymphoma, mycosis fungoides, or Sezary syndrome)
  • Age 18 years or older
  • Relapsed or refractory to at least 1 prior systemic therapy
  • Measurable disease by computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for participants in Cohort 1 and 2
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2
  • Life expectancy ≥ 6 months
  • Adequate respiratory function
  • Adequate bone marrow function
  • Adequate renal and hepatic function

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Known central nervous system (CNS) involvement by lymphoma
  • Previously received immune checkpoint therapy
  • Prior malignancy within the past 3 years, except for curatively treated basal or squamous cell skin cancer, superficial bladder cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast, or localized Gleason score 6 or lower prostate cancer
  • Active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune diseases that may relapse with some exceptions
  • Severe or debilitating pulmonary disease
  • Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
  • Active fungal, bacterial, and/or viral infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Known infection with HIV or active viral hepatitis B or C infection
  • Major surgery within 4 weeks of the first dose of study drug
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Vaccination with a live vaccine within 35 days prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Hypersensitivity to tislelizumab
  • Concurrent participation in another therapeutic clinical trial

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cohort 1: ENKTL
Participants with relapsed or refractory (R/R) extranodal natural killer-/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL; nasal or non-nasal type) were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or treatment discontinuation for any other reason (21 days per cycle)
Administered intravenously
Other Names:
  • BGB-A317
Experimental: Cohort 2: PTCL-NOS, AITL, and ALCL
Participants with other R/R mature T-cell neoplasms [limited to peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL)] were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or treatment discontinuation for any other reason (21 days per cycle)
Administered intravenously
Other Names:
  • BGB-A317
Experimental: Cohort 3: MF and SS
Participants with R/R cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [limited to mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sèzary syndrome (SS)] were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 of each cycle until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or treatment discontinuation for any other reason (21 days per cycle)
Administered intravenously
Other Names:
  • BGB-A317

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of complete response or partial response as determined by the investigator using Lugano criteria with Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria (LYRIC) modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and International Society for Cutaneous Lymphomas/European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (ISCL/EORTC) guidelines for cohort 3.
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
DOR defined as the time from the first determination of an objective response until progression or death, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
PFS is defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of disease progression or death, whichever occurs first, as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
OS defined as the time from first study drug administration to the date of death due to any reason for cohorts 1 and 2.
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
CRR is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve complete response or complete metabolic response as best overall response as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Time to Response (TTR)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Time to response defined as the time from first study drug administration to the time the response criteria (complete response or partial response) are first met as assessed by the investigator using Lugano criteria with LYRIC modification for cohorts 1 and 2 and ISCL/EORTC guidelines for cohort 3.
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Quality of Life Assessment: EQ-5D-5L Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Score
Time Frame: Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EQ-5D-5L visual analogue score (VAS). The EQ-5D-5L measures health outcomes using a VAS to record a participant's self-rated health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 100 is 'the best health you can imagine' and 0 is 'the worst health you can imagine.' An increasing score indicates improvements from baseline.
Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Quality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Global Health Status Score
Time Frame: Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/Quality of Life score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients and includes global health status and quality of life questions related to their overall health in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Answers are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating improved health status.
Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Quality of Life Assessment: EORTC QLQ-C30 Change From Baseline in Fatigue Score
Time Frame: Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Mean change from baseline at safety follow-up visit in EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue score. The EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 is a questionnaire that assesses quality of life of cancer patients and includes questions related to fatigue symptoms in which participants respond based on a 7-point scale, where 1 is very poor and 7 is excellent. Answers are converted to a score of 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating improved health status.
Baseline and on Day 1 in Cycles 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, 25, 29, and 33 (21 days per cycle) and safety follow-up visit (up to 30 days after end of treatment; up to approximately 3 years and 1 week)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week
Number of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs), including clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and vital signs
Up to approximately 3 years and 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Study Director, BeiGene

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Huiqiang Huang, et al. Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) for relapsed/refractory extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma: preliminary efficacy and safety results from a phase 2 study. Poster Abstract EP1268, European Hematology Association 2020.
  • Pier Luigi Zinzani, et al. Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) for relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphomas: Safety and efficacy results from a phase 2 study. Poster Abstract EP1235, European Hematology Association 2020.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on Tislelizumab

Subscribe