Efficacy of TAP Block in Cesarean Section Patients

November 8, 2018 updated by: Joel Yarmush, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital

A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of TAP Block in Cesarean Section Patients When Compared to Placebo

TAP Block done with 2 different concentrations of bupivacaine and placebo

Study Overview

Detailed Description

TAP Block was done using 2 different concentrations of bupivacaine (0.5% and 0.25%) and placebo and the post operative sedation was measured in each arm and compared together.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11215
        • New York Methodist Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy pregnant women

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: TAP using Bupivacaine 0.5%
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Active Comparator: TAP using Bupivacaine 0.25%
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.25% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.25% was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of normal saline was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®. A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane. A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane. After negative aspiration, 15 ml of normal saline was incrementally injected on each side. The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Using Either 0.5% or 0.25% Bupivacaine on Analgesia for Cesarean Section Patients When Compared to Placebo.
Time Frame: 0-24 hours
The total the number of Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) boluses used by the patients postoperatively within 24 hours
0-24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Adel Guirguis, MD, MS, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to share IPD with other researchers

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain Control

Clinical Trials on TAP block using Bupivacaine 0.5%

3
Subscribe