- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03493828
Efficacy of TAP Block in Cesarean Section Patients
November 8, 2018 updated by: Joel Yarmush, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
A Randomized Double Blinded Controlled Trial on the Efficacy of TAP Block in Cesarean Section Patients When Compared to Placebo
TAP Block done with 2 different concentrations of bupivacaine and placebo
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
TAP Block was done using 2 different concentrations of bupivacaine (0.5% and 0.25%) and placebo and the post operative sedation was measured in each arm and compared together.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Brooklyn, New York, United States, 11215
- New York Methodist Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy pregnant women
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to local anesthetics
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: TAP using Bupivacaine 0.5%
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®.
A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane.
A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane.
After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5% was incrementally injected on each side.
The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
|
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®.
A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane.
A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane.
After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.5% was incrementally injected on each side.
The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
|
Active Comparator: TAP using Bupivacaine 0.25%
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®.
A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane.
A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane.
After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.25% was incrementally injected on each side.
The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
|
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®.
A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane.
A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane.
After negative aspiration, 15 ml of Bupivacaine 0.25% was incrementally injected on each side.
The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®.
A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane.
A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane.
After negative aspiration, 15 ml of normal saline was incrementally injected on each side.
The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
|
Following completion of the Cesarean delivery, the abdomen was aseptically prepped with ChloraPrep®.
A Sonosite ultrasound machine (S-nerve) with a 14-8 MHz linear probe was used to visualize the lateral abdominal wall muscles and transversus abdominis plane.
A 2 or 4 inch stimuplex (Braun) needle was advanced under ultrasound guidance to the transversus abdominis plane.
After negative aspiration, 15 ml of normal saline was incrementally injected on each side.
The spread of solution within the transversus abdominis plane was visualized with the ultrasound.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Using Either 0.5% or 0.25% Bupivacaine on Analgesia for Cesarean Section Patients When Compared to Placebo.
Time Frame: 0-24 hours
|
The total the number of Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) boluses used by the patients postoperatively within 24 hours
|
0-24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Director: Adel Guirguis, MD, MS, New York Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2013
Study Completion (Actual)
December 1, 2013
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2015
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 10, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
April 11, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 13, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 8, 2018
Last Verified
November 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TAP2013
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
IPD Plan Description
No plan to share IPD with other researchers
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain Control
-
Ascension Genesys HospitalRecruiting
-
Overseas Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.Virginia Contract Research Organization Co., Ltd.Terminated
-
Universidade Estadual de Ponta GrossaCompleted
-
Severance HospitalCompletedPain ControlKorea, Republic of
-
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka...Recruiting
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompleted
-
University of Nevada, Las VegasCompleted
-
Vanderbilt UniversityWithdrawn
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompleted
-
Erzincan UniversityUnknownIntraoperative Pain ControlTurkey
Clinical Trials on TAP block using Bupivacaine 0.5%
-
Montefiore Medical CenterCompleted
-
Ceylan SaygiliIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedCholelithiasis | Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Postoperative AnalgesiaTurkey
-
Mayo General Hospital, IrelandUnknownLaparoscopic TAP Block in TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair.Ireland
-
Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation TrustCompletedPostoperative PainUnited Kingdom
-
Bozyaka Training and Research HospitalCompleted
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingPost Operative Analgesia in Children Undergoing Infraumblical SurgeriesEgypt
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentCompletedPostoperative Pain, Acute | Analgesia, Patient-ControlledTurkey
-
Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterWithdrawn
-
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and PharmacyUnknown
-
Indiana UniversityCompleted