Bleeding In Thrombocytopenia Explained (BITE)

Bleeding in Thrombocytopenia Explained

Multicenter case cohort study investigating clinical risk factors for clinically relevant bleeding in hemato-oncology patients, as well as bleeding related biomarkers during intensive treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Hemato-oncological patients treated with intensive chemotherapy receive prophylactic platelet transfusions to prevent bleeding events as soon as their platelet counts drop below 10 x109/L. This platelet count based prophylactic transfusion strategy, however, is both inefficient and often not needed. This is reflected in the high percentage of patients with bleeding despite this strategy (43%), and the high percentage of patients who do not bleed without this strategy (50%). Solely platelet count therefore is not a good predictor for bleeding. Identification of new risk factors and confirmation of already suspected risk factors is essential, and should lead to better prediction and prevention of bleeding. Patients with a high risk profile could be given more effective haemostatic treatments including more efficient transfusion strategies. On the other hand one could consider omitting prophylactic transfusions to low risk patients and conditions. Furthermore, additional knowledge about the pathophysiology of bleeding in hemato-oncology patients is needed.

Objective: Identify hemato-oncology patients and conditions with a high versus a low bleeding risk and investigate the association of bleeding related biomarkers with bleeding.

Study design: Case cohort study, consisting of two parts: epidemiologically research including short questionnaire (part A, eligible for all patients fulfilling inclusion criteria), and additional blood and urine sampling (part B, eligible only for included patients admitted for chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation).

Study population: Adult hemato-oncology patients: 1.) who are admitted for treatment and who have or will develop thrombocytopenia and are likely to receive one or more prophylactic platelet transfusions, and 2.) patients who have received such treatments in the last year but are readmitted to the hospital for disease or treatment related adverse events.

Intervention: Part A: standard available data collection, short questionnaire. Part B: sampling of blood and urine on top of routinely performed laboratory tests.

Main study parameters: Part A: The presence of clinical factors and results of routinely performed laboratory tests compared between bleeding versus non-bleeding patients. Part B: Presence of markers for coagulation-, platelet- and endothelial or vascular dysfunction compared between bleeding versus non-bleeding patients.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Part A: No burden or health risks: comparison of standard available data between bleeding and non-bleeding patients makes this a non-WMO part of the study, since there is no invasive intervention. The 10-15 minutes questionnaire in this respect is not considered as a burden. Part B of the study only applies for a subgroup of the included patients and falls under the scope of the WMO. The intervention is the additional to regularly performed citrate anticoagulated blood sampling (maximum 10 samples of 10-15 cc in 4 weeks), as well as weekly urine sampling. Both are considered a minor burden for participants, and the risk of additional blood sampling at regular sampling moments is negligible. Finally, all BITE-study activities in both study parts will not have any consequences on the treatment or monitoring of patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Zuid-Holland
      • Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands, 2333 ZA
        • Recruiting
        • LUMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Hemato-oncology patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion criteria are mentioned below and differ for part A and B of the study.

  • Admission in the hospital. (part A and B)
  • Age ≥ 18 years. (part A and B)

AND:

• Hemato-oncology patient, including MDS and AA, admitted for treatment (chemotherapy, SCT) who is (expected to become) thrombocytopenic with platelet counts of < 50 for expected at least 5 days and who will possibly be treated with one or more prophylactic platelet transfusions. (part A and B)

OR:

• Hemato-oncology patient who had previous intensive chemotherapy or stem cell transplantation and who is admitted to the hematology ward for disease or treatment related events or complications. (part A only)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients with myeloproliferative disorders.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
cohort
All patients fulfilling the eligibility criteria who can be asked for consent. Basic register of only patient diagnosis, treatment and bleeding yes or no (without identifiable information).
cases
Patient with clinically relevant bleeding, defined as major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding that leads to substantial additional medical care: WHO score 3-4 and part of the WHO score 2 bleedings (depending on the need for additional care).
  • Blood withdrawal will be at regular sampling moments, blood can be collected from a central venous catheter or venepuncture procedure.
  • Blood withdrawal will be performed for a maximum of 10 times per admission, 10 ml per time.
  • Urine sampling will be for a maximum of 5 times per admission.
  • Urine can be sampled from a catheter when present, or collected regular.
Other Names:
  • Collection of urine (with or without catheter)
Questionnaire to investigate a bleeding tendency before diagnosis.
controls
Patient without clinically relevant bleeding matched to a case patient based on diagnosis and therapy.
  • Blood withdrawal will be at regular sampling moments, blood can be collected from a central venous catheter or venepuncture procedure.
  • Blood withdrawal will be performed for a maximum of 10 times per admission, 10 ml per time.
  • Urine sampling will be for a maximum of 5 times per admission.
  • Urine can be sampled from a catheter when present, or collected regular.
Other Names:
  • Collection of urine (with or without catheter)
Questionnaire to investigate a bleeding tendency before diagnosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinically relevant bleeding events
Time Frame: Bleeding must occur during hospital admission, which on average will be 3-4 weeks.

Bleeding events that are clinically relevant. i.e. all WHO grade 3 and 4 bleedings, as well as WHO grade 2 bleedings that lead to substantial additional medical care (ISTH criteria).

We will quantify the association of possible risk factors for bleeding with this primary outcome. These risk factors are listed in the protocol.

Bleeding must occur during hospital admission, which on average will be 3-4 weeks.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: During hospital admission, which on average will be 3-4 weeks.
Mortality during hospital stay in bleeding vs non-bleeding patients
During hospital admission, which on average will be 3-4 weeks.
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: At the day of discharge, which will be on average 3-4 weeks.
Duration of hospital stay in bleeding vs non-bleeding patients
At the day of discharge, which will be on average 3-4 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemorrhage

Clinical Trials on Blood withdrawal

3
Subscribe