Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Sepsis

April 23, 2018 updated by: Sibtain Ahmed, Aga Khan University

Prospective Evaluation of Serum Procalcitonin in Critically Ill Patients With Suspected Sepsis- Experience From a Tertiary Care Hospital in Pakistan

Procalcitonin is a promising marker of sepsis in critically ill patients. Procalcitonin have better diagnostic accuracy compared to White blood cell count and C - reactive protein. Investigators propose that adding Procalcitonin to the list of standard laboratory work up of critically ill patients with suspected sepsis could increase diagnostic accuracy leading to better patient care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: Sepsis is the leading cause of mortality in critically ill patients. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a promising marker for identification of bacterial sepsis. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of serum PCT concentration in patients with suspected sepsis admitted to mixed medical-surgical Intensive care unit (ICU).

Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study conducted at section of Chemical Pathology, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and ICU. Patients with suspected sepsis were included, serum PCT cut off ≥0.5 ng /ml was taken for diagnosing sepsis. Diagnostic accuracy was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) taking blood culture as gold standard. Furthermore, different cut offs were compared by using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC). Data analysis was done on SPSS version.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sindh
      • Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan, 71000
        • Sibtain Ahmed

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with suspected sepsis were recruited

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Both male and female patients less than 70 and greater than 18 years of age
  2. Patients full filling the sepsis definition (American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference)
  3. Patients were recruited within 24 hour of ICU admission

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients discharged before 24 hours
  2. Patients who had blood transfusion before ICU stay
  3. Patients with organ failure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Culture positive
Seven ml of blood was drawn in gel separator tubes within 24 hours of admission in ICU for Procalcitonin determination
Culture negative
Seven ml of blood was drawn in gel separator tubes within 24 hours of admission in ICU for Procalcitonin determination

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of Procalcitonin
Time Frame: one year
Diagnostic accuracy was measured in terms of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) taking blood culture as gold standard. Furthermore, different cut offs were compared by using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC).
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

December 3, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RRG # 2013-06

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Serum Procalcitonin

3
Subscribe