An Electronic Registry to Improve Adherence to Active Surveillance Monitoring at a Safety-net Hospital

August 2, 2022 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

An Electronic Registry to Improve Adherence to Active Surveillance Monitoring Among Men With Prostate Cancer at a Safety-net Hospital: A Study Protocol

To implement and evaluate a health information technology platform designed to support the management of patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer in an urban, publicly-funded outpatient setting.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

We aim to implement and evaluate a health information technology (HIT) registry at an urban, public delivery system. We will use systems engineering methodologies to design, develop, and implement the platform. The platform will be implemented in the Urology clinic that cares for patients with prostate cancer. We are conducting a prospective non-randomized pilot study that will follow men who choose active surveillance as a management strategy for prostate cancer. We aim to assess the impact of the HIT registry on patient monitoring and adherence.

The HIT platform seeks to improve the monitoring and alerting functionality of existing systems. Specifically, it replaces paper-based or ineffective computer-based systems previously used by the clinic to monitor its active surveillance patients. It will be implemented clinic-wide for all patients being monitored by an active surveillance protocol. The platform is approved for clinical use and research by the San Francisco Health Network and the University of California, San Francisco.

Research involves materials that are collected for nonresearch purposes, as well as low-risk research employing survey, interview, focus group, program evaluation, and human factors methodologies. We will solicit structured feedback from registry users designed to continuously evaluate and improve performance in a clinical area to reduce patient safety gaps. Patient medical records will be reviewed, but patients monitored on the registry will not be contacted by researchers.

Procedures are in place to monitor the registry. First, quality assurance is performed by the research team, information technology analysts in the San Francisco Health Network, as well as by the third-party software provider. This includes checking that data in the platform matches source data, such as data entered in the electronic health record. In addition, users are audited on a weekly basis. A data dictionary defining variables used in the platform exists and is updated as needed. The HIT platform users include clinicians who are responsible for monitoring patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Patients who are enrolled in the active surveillance program will be added to the registry by a clinician. The research team will support the clinicians in data analysis, although this will be performed with population-level, de-identified data. However, if unmediated adverse events are identified by the research team, the research team will alert the clinicians appropriately. The research team will also develop training materials and conduct training sessions to ensure that all clinicians responsible for monitoring patients on active surveillance are provided with up-to-date resources and accessible support. The HIT platform is designed to supplement, but not replace, the existing electronic health record. Data on the registry will be validated with source data and users will still engage with the source data and electronic health record as appropriate clinically and operationally.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
        • Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Active Surveillance for prostate cancer is recommended as an initial management strategy for men with low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Eligibility criteria at our institution include diagnostic prostate-specific antigen <= 10 ng/ml, clinical stage T1 or T2, Gleason scores <= 3+4, <=33% positive cores, and <= 50% tumor in any single core. Men who do not meet these eligibility criteria by elect to be managed by Active Surveillance may also be included.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who elect to be managed by Active Surveillance for prostate cancer by the Urology Clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Active Surveillance Patients
Patients who elect to be monitored by an Active Surveillance protocol for prostate cancer
Patients who are diagnosed with prostate cancer and elect to be monitored by an Active Surveillance protocol by the Urology Clinic at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center will be included in this group. The intervention is the implementation of a registry, designed to replace existing but suboptimal systems for tracking patients. All Active Surveillance patients monitored by the clinic will be included.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delayed follow-up - Number of days monitoring is delayed past recommended follow-up interval,
Time Frame: 2 years
measured from date monitoring (e.g. prostate-specific antigen test or biopsy) is scheduled to date monitoring occurs.
2 years
Acceptability and feasibility of intervention - Semi-structured interviews
Time Frame: 1 year
Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention among clinicians will be measured using the Technology Acceptance Model (Venkatesh et al). Semi-structured interviews will be conducted to assess usefulness and ease of use.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients lost to follow-up
Time Frame: 2 years
The proportion of patients who are lost to follow-up, defined as three subsequent unsuccessful outreach attempts
2 years
Proportion of patients that adhere to recommended monitoring
Time Frame: 2 years
Adherence to monitoring (e.g. prostate-specific antigen test every 3 months) will be assessed. Monitoring will be considered adherent if it occurs within 30 days of the recommendation.
2 years
Proportion of patients that move from active surveillance to active treatment at a cancer stage that is more advanced than the stage recorded upon entry into program.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Urmimala Sarkar, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 29, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostatic Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Registry

3
Subscribe