Evaluation of HCV Viremia Testing Approaches Among PWID in Georgia (HEAD-Start)

Feasibility, Acceptability, Effectiveness and Cost-analysis of Models of HCV Viremia Testing for Confirmation and Cure Among People Who Inject Drugs (PWID): the HEAD*-Start Trial in Georgia

This study will evaluate two novel approaches to improve access to Hepatitis C virus (HCV) confirmatory viremia testing. Both approaches are "Harm reduction site-based (HRS)" because HCV viremia testing will be initiated and test results will be provided at the HRSs. These approaches will be compared to the current standard of care (control) in which anti-HCV-positive individuals must travel to a HCV treatment centre for HCV viremia testing. The investigators hypothesize that improving access to viremia testing improves linkage to care and reduces loss to follow-up among those who screen anti-HCV-positive.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

A major step in identifying HCV infected individuals in Georgia has already been implemented by providing rapid anti-HCV testing for people who inject drugs (PWID) at HRS. However, access to HCV confirmatory viremia testing remains limited as PWID must be referred to treatment centers for testing.

Two novel approaches to improve access to HCV viremia testing will be evaluated.

In the first approach, participants with a positive anti-HCV test will have blood drawn and HCV RNA test performed at the HRS. Test results will be provided the same day (or the following day if the participant is unable to wait for results) at the HRS.

In the second approach participants with a positive anti-HCV test will have blood drawn at the HRS. The blood will be processed on site and a plasma sample shipped to a central laboratory for viremia testing. Test results will be communicated to the participants by HRS staff at a follow-up visit as soon as the results are available.

In both groups, participants who test positive will be referred to a treatment centre for further assessments and subsequent treatment initiation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1672

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Batumi, Georgia
        • Imedi Harm Reduction Site
      • Gori, Georgia
        • Step to the Future Harm Reduction Site
      • Kutaisi, Georgia
        • New Way Harm Reduction Site
      • Rust'avi, Georgia
        • New Vector Harm Reduction Site
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • Akeso Harm Reduction Site
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • New Vector Harm Reduction Site
      • Tbilisi, Georgia
        • New Way Harm Reduction Site
      • Zugdidi, Georgia
        • Xenon Harm Reduction Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  1. People who inject drugs attending for care and needle provision at harm reduction sites.

    Inclusion criteria:

    • Any history of injection drug use (IDU)
    • Age ≥18 years
    • Anti-HCV-positive on rapid diagnostic test performed at the HRS
    • Eligible for the Georgia HCV State Program
    • Living in the catchment area served by the HRS
    • No plans to move out of the catchment area during the next 6 months
    • Willing and able to give informed consent

    Exclusion criteria:

    • Tested HCV RNA-positive from April 2015
    • Pregnancy (self-report)
    • Currently on treatment for hepatitis C
    • Unable to provide a blood sample
  2. HRS staff involved in HCV testing and care:

    Inclusion criteria

    • Provide HCV services at HRS from screening through linkage to care.
  3. Laboratory staff performing HCV viremia testing at the HRSs, Lugar Centre and Treatment centres:

Inclusion criteria:

  • Perform HCV viremia testing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Decentralized testing approach
Harm reduction site HCV viremia testing approach A. Four HRS will conduct blood draw and point-of-service (decentralized) HCV RNA testing, and results will be provided at the HRS on the same or the following day.
Blood draw and HCV viremia testing is done at point of service (Intervention A) Blood draw at point of service and HCV viremia testing at a centralized laboratory (Intervention B)
Experimental: Centralized testing approach
Harm reduction site HCV viremia testing approach B. Two sites will collect blood samples on site and transport them to a reference (centralized) laboratory for HCV viremia testing. Results will be provided at a follow-up visit to the HRS as soon as results are available.
Blood draw and HCV viremia testing is done at point of service (Intervention A) Blood draw at point of service and HCV viremia testing at a centralized laboratory (Intervention B)
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Current standard of care. Patients who screen anti-HCV positive at HRS will be referred to HCV treatment centers for HCV RNA testing, and results will be provided at a follow-up visit to the treatment center.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HCV care cascade
Time Frame: 6 months
1.1. Proportion of participants with a positive HCV viremia test who complete each subsequent step in the HCV care cascade
6 months
HCV confirmatory viremia test result receipt
Time Frame: 1-30 days
Proven superiority (with a margin of 10%) of the proportion of participants with a positive anti-HCV test who receive results of an HCV confirmation of viremia test in each intervention arm separately, compared to referral-based testing (SOC)
1-30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Entry into HCV care
Time Frame: 1-14 days
Proven superiority (with a margin of 10%) of the proportion of participants with positive anti-HCV test who submit a blood sample for viremia testing in each intervention arm separately, compared to referral based testing (SOC)
1-14 days
Treatment Initiation Fraction
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Proportion of participants with positive HCV viremia test who initiate hepatitis treatment
4 weeks
HCV confirmatory viremia test result receipt by intervention
Time Frame: 1-14 day
Proportion of participants with a positive anti-HCV test who receive results of an HCV confirmation of viremia test using decentralized HCV RNA testing compared to centralized HCV core antigen
1-14 day
Cost of HCV confirmatory viremia testing approach
Time Frame: 6 months
Costs of HCV viremia testing approaches from a health service and patient perspective
6 months
Operational performance of HCV confirmatory viremia testing
Time Frame: 6 months
Testing volumes at the harm reduction sites
6 months
Uptake of HCV confirmatory viremia testing
Time Frame: 4-8 weeks
Facilitators and barriers of getting an HCV confirmatory viremia test as perceived by participants and health care workers
4-8 weeks
Attitudes and preferences of participants for HCV confirmatory viremia testing as assessed on a Likert scale
Time Frame: 4-8 weeks
Willingness of participants to get HCV confirmatory viremia testing as assessed on the Likert Scale of 'strongly agree' (0), 'agree' (1), 'neither agree nor disagree' (2), 'disagree' (3), 'strongly disagree' (4)
4-8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Sonjelle Shilton, Find
  • Principal Investigator: Irma Khonelidze, National Centre for Disease Control, Georgia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 21, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C, Chronic

Clinical Trials on HCV viremia testing approaches

3
Subscribe