Long Term Outcome on Brain and Lung of Different Oxygen Strategies in ARDS Patients (LTO-BLOXY)

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a serious disease with high mortality. In patients who survive ARDS, respiratory, neurological and motor sequelae are frequent, negatively impacting on the patient's quality of life, and engendering substantial healthcare costs (rehabilitation, long-term care, delayed return to work). There may also be repercussions on the patient's family and entourage. The severity of ARDS and the burden it represents have underpinned intensive research to identify treatment strategies that could improve mortality. However, it is important to ensure that any improvement in mortality does not come at the price of an excess of sequelae and disability in survivors.

The oxygenation strategy used to treat ARDS may have an impact on mortality in these patients. The CLOSE study, in which our group participated, recently demonstrated the feasibility of two oxygenation strategies in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ARDS. We have also initiated the LOCO-2 study (NCT02713451), whose aim is to show a reduction in mortality in ARDS using a "conservative" oxygenation strategy (PaO2 maintained between 55 and 70 mmHg) as compared to a classical "liberal" oxygenation strategy (PaO2 between 90 and 105 mmHg).

The LTO-BLOXY study is a substudy of the on-going LOCO-2 study

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The LTO-BLOXY study will compare respiratory, cognitive and exercise function outcomes in patients who underwent one of the two oxygenation strategies in the context of the on-going LOCO-2 study:

  • Experimental group: oxygenation will be maintained at a level between 55 and 70 mmHg of PaO2 as measured by blood gas test ("conservative" oxygenation). Between blood gas measures, oxygenation will be optimized to achieve an SpO2 between 88% and 92%.
  • Control group: oxygenation will be maintained at a level between 90 and 105 mmHg of PaO2 as measured by blood gas test ("liberal" oxygenation). Between blood gas measures, oxygenation will be optimized to achieve an SpO2 >96%.

The primary objective is to demonstrate a lower level of impairment of respiratory function at 6 months in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after a "conservative" oxygenation strategy, as compared to a "liberal" oxygenation strategy.

Secondary objectives are numerous and will explore different areas such as evalution of disability, respiratory function, exercise function, cognitive function and quality of life.

Participation in the LTO-BLOXY study will be proposed to all patients included in LOCO-2 at discharge from the ICU. A total of 259 patients from the overall total of 850 expected inclusions in LOCO-2, will participate in the LTO-BLOXY study. These patients will be followed up to 1 year after their initial inclusion in LOCO-2, with a view to evaluate respiratory function, exercise function and cognitive function, as well as QoL.

The calendar of their study participation is as follows:

  • Inclusion in LOCO-2 study and randomization LOCO-2
  • Inclusion in LTO-BLOXY study at discharge from the ICU
  • 3 month visit ± 2 weeks (3 months after inclusion in LOCO-2 study)
  • 6 month visit ± 2 weeks (6 months after inclusion in LOCO-2 study)
  • 12 month visit ± 2 weeks (12 months after inclusion in LOCO-2 study)

At each follow-up visit, the patient will attend a consultation in the Department of Physiology - Functional Explorations, where the study questionnaires will be given to the patient for completion. The neuropsychologist will perform the cognitive tests, the respiratory function and exercise tests will also be performed at the same visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

259

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ARDS defined as a PF ratio <300
  • Patients under ventilation for <12 hours
  • Stabilization period of 3 hours with standardization of ventilation parameters

Inclusion criterion specific for neurological evaluation:

- Patient aged between 20 and 89 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic respiratory failure or on home ventilation (excluding obstructive sleep apnoea)
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Moribund patients (death likely within 48 hours as assessed by the ICU physician)
  • Gaseous embolism
  • CO poisoning
  • Pregnant women
  • Indication for hyperbaric oxygen treatment
  • Persistent pneumothorax
  • Gaseous gangrene
  • DNR or limited care order

Exclusion criteria specific for neurological evaluation:

  • History of neurological disorders: cranial trauma, stroke, cerebral tumor, epilepsy, neuro-degenerative disease.
  • Psychiatric disorders: bipolar disorder, psychosis, addiction, schizophrenia.
  • Lack of autonomy due to previously documented cognitive and/or psychomotor impairment.
  • Hearing and/or sight impairment that prevent the patient from performing the study tests

Patients presenting exclusion criteria for the neurological evaluation can nonetheless be included in the study for the evaluation of respiratory function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Liberal Oxygenation (LO) group

A modulation of inspired fraction of oxygen will be performed with an objective of PaO2 between 90 to 105 mmHg that will be checked on arterial blood gases (ABG). Between these measurements, SpO2 will be kept more or equal to 96 percent. Alarms will be set at 95 percent for SpO2.

Intervention: Drug: Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

In the two groups, if patient is not in the range of arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2) will be modified from 5 percent if difference between target is less than 5 mmHg and from 10 percent if difference from target is higher. A new arterial blood gases (ABG) will be performed 30 minutes later to check for the oxygen target range. When ABG are performed, pulsed oxymetry is compared with arterial saturation (SaO2) to adapt survey. Between each ABG, FiO2 is modified from 5 percent to 5 percent each five minutes until reaching good pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2) target (that can be modified in function of the comparison of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 and SpO2 with ABG).

This management of FiO2 will be done until extubation of the patient.

Experimental: Conservative Oxygenation (CO) group

A modulation of inspired fraction of oxygen will be performed with an objective of PaO2 between 55 to 70 mmHg that will be checked on arterial blood gases. Between these measurements, SpO2 will be kept between 88 and 92 percent. Alarms will be set between 87 and 93 percent for SpO2.

Intervention: Drug: Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

In the two groups, if patient is not in the range of arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2) will be modified from 5 percent if difference between target is less than 5 mmHg and from 10 percent if difference from target is higher. A new arterial blood gases (ABG) will be performed 30 minutes later to check for the oxygen target range. When ABG are performed, pulsed oxymetry is compared with arterial saturation (SaO2) to adapt survey. Between each ABG, FiO2 is modified from 5 percent to 5 percent each five minutes until reaching good pulsed oxygen saturation (SpO2) target (that can be modified in function of the comparison of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2 and SpO2 with ABG).

This management of FiO2 will be done until extubation of the patient.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diffusing Capacity of the Lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary endpoint is the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), a measure that reflects disorders in pulmonary gas volume, the alveolar-capillary membrane, and the volume of blood in the lung capillaries
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of disability (Functional Independence Measure)
Time Frame: inclusion, 6 months
FIM scale to assess the patient's performance in the activities of daily living, including cognitive and relational aspects.
inclusion, 6 months
A binary composite morbi-mortality variable
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months

A binary composite morbi-mortality variable defined as follow:

  • Failure: death or poor FIM
  • Success: alive and good recuperation
6 months, 12 months
Respiratory function: plethysmography
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Total lung capacity and functional residual capacity measured by plethysmography
3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Respiratory function
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio
3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Respiratory function: blood gases
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
PaO2 and PaCO2 measured in room air at rest
3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Respiratory function: inspiratory pressure
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) and maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) (diaphragm function).
3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Exercise function: 6-min walk test
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
distance covered during a 6-minute walk test, in meters
3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Exercise function: cyclo ergometer
Time Frame: 6 months
Physiological parameters measured at peak effort limited by symptoms on a bicycle ergometer exercise test
6 months
Cognitive function: screening tests
Time Frame: inclusion, 3 months
Cognitive function will be investigated firstly through the use of rapid screening tests
inclusion, 3 months
Cognitive function
Time Frame: 12 months
Cognitive function will be investigated secondly through an evaluation performed by a neuropsychologist through the use of the RAPID battery
12 months
Quality of life: The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
The SF36, in its validated French language version, is an established instrument used to evaluate quality of life (QoL).The questionnaire yields an overall score between 0 and 100, with a higher score indicating better QoL.
3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 20, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Modulation of Inspired Fraction of Oxygen (FiO2)

3
Subscribe