- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03626545
Phase III Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Combination With Docetaxel in Adult Subjects With Non-small Cell Lung Cancers as a Second or Third Line Therapy (CANOPY-2)
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase III Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Canakinumab in Combination With Docetaxel Versus Placebo in Combination With Docetaxel in Adult Subjects With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Previously Treated With PD-(L)1 Inhibitors and Platinum-based Chemotherapy (CANOPY 2)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This was a multicenter, Phase III study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of canakinumab in combination with docetaxel versus placebo in combination with docetaxel, as second- or third-line treatment. The study included adult subjects with advanced NSCLC whose disease had progressed after prior treatment with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor. Subjects had also been pre-treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, either given together with PD-(L)1 inhibitor or sequentially.
The study consisted of 2 parts:
- Part 1: Safety run-in. This part was conducted to confirm the Recommended Phase 3 Regimen (RP3R) of the canakinumab and docetaxel combination. Participants were treated for at least 2 complete cycles of treatment (21 days per cycle) for safety evaluation (DLT-Dose Limiting Toxicities) to define RP3R. Participants from the safety run-in part were treated until any discontinuation criteria were met. After treatment discontinuation, all participants were followed for safety evaluations during the safety follow up period (up to 130 days). Additionally, subjects who discontinued study treatment without prior documented disease progression continued efficacy assessments in the efficacy follow-up phase irrespective of the start of new antineoplastic therapy and until documented progressive disease as per protocol. After the RP3R was determined, enrollment in this part was closed and additional participants were enrolled in the randomized part (part 2) of the study. Ongoing patients from the safety run-in part continued their treatment at the assigned dose level according to the dose and schedule for the safety run-in part.
- Part 2: Randomized part. The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled part of the study opened after confirmation of the RP3R for the combination of canakinumab and docetaxel. Participants from the randomized part were treated until any discontinuation criteria were met as per protocol. After treatment discontinuation, all participants were followed for safety evaluations during the safety follow up period (up to 130 days). Additionally, subjects who discontinued study treatment without prior documented disease progression continued efficacy assessments in the efficacy follow-up phase irrespective of the start of new antineoplastic therapy and until documented progressive disease as per protocol.
Based on the lack of efficacy observed in the primary analysis, Novartis decided to halt canakinumab/placebo treatment. Subjects continued to receive docetaxel if they were deriving clinical benefit as per investigator assessment until discontinuation
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
La Rioja, Argentina, 5300
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Santiago del Estero, Argentina, 4200
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Buenos Aires
-
Berazategui, Buenos Aires, Argentina, B1884BBF
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Caba, Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1426ANZ
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina, B7600FZN
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Queensland
-
Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia, 4120
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Victoria
-
Shepparton, Victoria, Australia, 3630
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Bruxelles, Belgium, 1200
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Charleroi, Belgium, 6000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Gent, Belgium, 9000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Roeselare, Belgium, 8800
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Oost Vlaanderen
-
Sint Niklaas, Oost Vlaanderen, Belgium, 9100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
BA
-
Salvador, BA, Brazil, 40170-110
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
RS
-
Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90880-480
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
SC
-
Itajai, SC, Brazil, 88301-229
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 4E6
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4A 3J1
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Santiago, Chile, 7500006
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Shanghai, China, 200433
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Sichuan
-
Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 610041
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Brno - Bohunice, Czechia, 625 00
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Ostrava Vitkovice, Czechia, 703 84
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Herlev, Denmark, DK 2730
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Odense C, Denmark, DK 5000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Besancon Cedex, France, 25030
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Bordeaux Cedex, France, 33000
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Bron, France, 69677
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Strasbourg Cedex, France, 67091
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Cedex 09
-
Le Mans, Cedex 09, France, 72037
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 13125
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Dresden, Germany, 01307
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Frankfurt, Germany, 60488
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Gerlingen, Germany, 70839
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Grosshansdorf, Germany, 22947
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Koeln, Germany, 51109
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Ulm, Germany, 89081
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Heraklion Crete, Greece, 711 10
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Thessaloniki, Greece, 57001
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Pest
-
Torokbalint, Pest, Hungary, 2045
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ramat Gan, Israel, 52621
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
LU
-
Lucca, LU, Italy, 55100
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
MI
-
Rozzano, MI, Italy, 20089
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
PN
-
Aviano, PN, Italy, 33081
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Osaka, Japan, 545-8586
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Aichi
-
Nagoya, Aichi, Japan, 464 8681
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Hyogo
-
Himeji, Hyogo, Japan, 670-8520
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Kanagawa
-
Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, Japan, 241-8515
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Tokyo
-
Chuo ku, Tokyo, Japan, 104 0045
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Amman, Jordan, 11941
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03722
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 05505
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Seocho Gu
-
Seoul, Seocho Gu, Korea, Republic of, 06591
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Ashrafieh, Lebanon, 166830
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081 HV
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229 HX
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Gdansk, Poland, 80 952
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Rzeszow, Poland, 35-021
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Warszawa, Poland, 02 781
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Pushkin Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 196603
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197758
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Singapore, Singapore, 168583
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Madrid, Spain, 28041
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28034
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28040
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Madrid, Spain, 28222
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Andalucia
-
Malaga, Andalucia, Spain, 29010
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Catalunya
-
Badalona, Catalunya, Spain, 08916
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Comunidad Valenciana
-
Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 46014
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
Galicia
-
La Coruna, Galicia, Spain, 15006
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
-
Tainan, Taiwan, 70403
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
Taipei, Taiwan, 103616
- Novartis Investigative Site
-
-
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- Emory Winship Cancer Institute
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
- Saint Luke's Hospital/Marion Bloch Neuroscience Institute Dept of Regulatory
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
- Montefiore Medical Center Albert Einstein College of Med
-
-
Ohio
-
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45267
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- MD Anderson
-
-
Utah
-
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112 0550
- Huntsman Cancer Institute Univ of Utah .
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed advanced (stage IIIB) or metastatic NSCLC.
- Subject had received one prior platinum-based chemotherapy and one prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy for locally advanced or metastatic disease.
- Subject with ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1.
- Subject with at least 1 evaluable (measurable or non-measurable) lesion by RECIST 1.1 in solid tumors criteria.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject who previously received docetaxel, canakinumab (or another IL-1β inhibitor), or any systemic therapy for their locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC other than one platinum-based chemotherapy and one prior PD-(L)1 inhibitor.
- Subject with EGFRor ALK positive tumor.
- History of severe hypersensitivity reaction to monoclonal antibodies, taxanes or excipients of docetaxel or canakinumab.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Safety run-in part: Canakinumab+docetaxel
Participants were treated with full doses of docetaxel 75mg/m^2 intravenous and canakinumab 200 mg subcutaneous on Day 1 of each 21-Day cycle (dose level 1).
Subjects were assessed for at least 2 complete cycles of treatment (21 days per cycle; a total of 42 days) for safety evaluation (DLT) to define RP3R.
De-escalation to canakinumab 200 mg subcutaneous every 6 weeks + docetaxel 75 mg/m^2, every 3 weeks could also be considered.
|
Canakinumab, 200 mg, subcutaneous.
The initial dose regimen was once every 3 weeks (on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle)
Other Names:
Docetaxel 75mg/m^2, intravenous, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
|
Experimental: Randomized part: Canakinumab + docetaxel
Participants were treated with canakinumab subcutaneous at RP3R and docetaxel at 75 mg/m^2 every 3 weeks
|
Canakinumab, 200 mg, subcutaneous.
The initial dose regimen was once every 3 weeks (on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle)
Other Names:
Docetaxel 75mg/m^2, intravenous, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
|
Placebo Comparator: Randomized part: Placebo + docetaxel
Participants were treated with placebo subcutaneous at RP3R and docetaxel at 75 mg/m^2 every 3 weeks
|
Docetaxel 75mg/m^2, intravenous, administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle
Placebo, sub-cutaneous, admnistered at the RP3R defined in Part 1-safety run-in.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Safety run-in Part: Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Time Frame: During the first 42 days of dosing
|
Percentage of participants with DLTs.
A dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) is defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value assessed as unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications that occurs within the first 42 days of docetaxel and canakinumab treatment.
|
During the first 42 days of dosing
|
Randomized Part: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From randomization until death or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (up to approximately (approx.) 18 months)
|
OS is defined as the time from randomization to date of death due to any cause.
The OS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each treatment group.
If a subject was not known to have died, then OS was censored at the latest date the subject was known to be alive (on or before the cut-off date).
|
From randomization until death or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (up to approximately (approx.) 18 months)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 10 months for the safety run-in part and 18 months for the randomized part)
|
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per investigator's assessment by RECIST 1.1. The 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Clopper and Pearson method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
Through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 10 months for the safety run-in part and 18 months for the randomized part)
|
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: From first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression, death or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (up to approx. 10 months for the safety run-in and 18 months for the randomized)
|
DOR is defined as the time from first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression or death, by investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The DOR distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each treatment group. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
From first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression, death or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (up to approx. 10 months for the safety run-in and 18 months for the randomized)
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 10 months for the safety run-in part and 18 months for the randomized part)
|
DCR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR or with stable disease (SD) as per investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The 95% CIs were computed using Clopper and Pearson method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease. |
Through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 10 months for the safety run-in part and 18 months for the randomized part)
|
Randomized Part: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From randomization until disease progression, death or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (assessed up to approx. 18 months)
|
PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the date of the first documented radiological progression by investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1 response criteria or death due to any cause. The PFS distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each treatment group. If a participant did not have disease progression or die at the analysis cut-off date, PFS was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. |
From randomization until disease progression, death or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (assessed up to approx. 18 months)
|
Randomized Part: Time to Response (TTR)
Time Frame: From randomization until first documented response or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (up to approx. 18 months)
|
TTR is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documented response of either CR or PR, by investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The TTR distribution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for each treatment group. Subjects without a confirmed CR or PR at the time of the analysis cut-off date were censored at the study-maximum follow-up time for subjects with a PFS event (i.e., disease progression or death due to any cause), or at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for subjects without a PFS event. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. |
From randomization until first documented response or final analysis data cutoff date (08-Jan-2021) whichever comes first (up to approx. 18 months)
|
Randomized Part: Time to Definitive 10-point Deterioration (TTD) Symptom Scores of Chest Pain, Cough and Dyspnea Per European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) Lung Cancer (LC13) Questionnaire
Time Frame: From baseline through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 18 months)
|
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (ie, coughing, dyspnea, and chest pain) and treatment-related symptoms from conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ie.
hair loss, neuropathy, sore mouth, and dysphagia).
Scores for each scale and single-item range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher level of symptoms.
TTD for chest pain, cough and dyspnea is defined as the time from randomization to the date of event, which is defined as at least 10 points absolute worsening from baseline of the corresponding scale score, with no later change below this threshold ie.<10 points was observed or if this worsening was observed at the last assessment for the subject, or death due to any cause (whichever occurs earlier).
If a subject did not have an event, TTD was censored at the last adequate assessment.
|
From baseline through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 18 months)
|
Randomized Part: Time to Definitive 10-point Deterioration in Global Health Status (GHS)/Quality of Life (QoL), Shortness of Breath and Pain Per EORTC QLQ-C30 Questionnaire
Time Frame: From baseline through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 18 months)
|
The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical,role,cognitive,emotional and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,pain and nausea/vomiting), a GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items (constipation,diarrhea,insomnia,shortness of breath,appetite loss and financial difficulties).
For each scale and single-item, scores range between 0 and 100.
A high score for functional scales/ GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL, a high score for symptom scales/single items represents significant symptomatology.
TTD in GHS/QoL, shortness of breath and pain is defined as the time from randomization to the date of event, defined as at least 10 points absolute worsening from baseline of the corresponding scale score, with no later change below this threshold i.e.<10 points was observed or if this worsening was observed at the last assessment for the subject, or death due to any cause (whichever occurs earlier).
If a subject did not have an event, TTD was censored at the last adequate assessment.
|
From baseline through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to approx. 18 months)
|
Randomized Part: Change From Baseline in GHS/QoL, Shortness of Breath and Pain Scores as Per the EORTC QLQ C30 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks from Week 3 until end of treatment, every 6 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), 7 and 28 days post progression through final analysis cutoff date of 08Jan2021 (up to approx. 18 months)
|
The EORTC QLQ-C30 includes 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional and social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea/vomiting), a GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items (constipation, diarrhea, insomnia, dyspnoea, appetite loss and financial difficulties).
For each scale and item, scores range 0-100.
A high score for functional scales/QoL represents better functioning/QoL; a high score for symptom scales and items represents significant symptomatology.
Changes from baseline in QoL, shortness of breath and pain scores are presented.
For QoL, a negative change from baseline indicates improvement; for shortness of breath and pain a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
For subjects who discontinued treatment without disease progression, post-treatment efficacy visits 1, 2, 3 and 5 were conducted every 6 weeks (for the first 12 months since start of treatment) and every 12 weeks (after 12 months since start of treatment) until disease progression
|
Baseline, every 3 weeks from Week 3 until end of treatment, every 6 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), 7 and 28 days post progression through final analysis cutoff date of 08Jan2021 (up to approx. 18 months)
|
Randomized Part: Change From Baseline in Chest Pain, Cough and Dyspnea Scores as Per the EORTC-QLQ LC13 Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks from Week 3 until end of treatment, every 6 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), 7 and 28 days post progression through final analysis cutoff date of 08Jan2021 (up to approx. 18 months)
|
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 is a 13-item questionnaire.
It comprises both multi-item and single-item measures of lung cancer-associated symptoms (ie, coughing, dyspnea, and chest pain) and treatment-related symptoms from conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ie, hair loss, neuropathy, sore mouth, and dysphagia).
Scores for each scale and single-item range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher ("worse") level of symptoms.
Changes from baseline in chest pain, cough and dyspnea scores are presented.
A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
For subjects who discontinued treatment without disease progression, post-treatment efficacy visits 1, 2, 3 and 5 were conducted every 6 weeks (for the first 12 months since start of treatment) and every 12 weeks (after 12 months since start of treatment) until disease progression
|
Baseline, every 3 weeks from Week 3 until end of treatment, every 6 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), 7 and 28 days post progression through final analysis cutoff date of 08Jan2021 (up to approx. 18 months)
|
Randomized Part: Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Scores
Time Frame: Baseline, every 3 weeks from Week 3 until end of treatment, every 6 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), 7 and 28 days post progression through final analysis cutoff date of 08Jan2021 (up to approx. 18 months)
|
The EQ-5D-5L descriptive system provides a profile of the participant's health state in 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression).
For each of these dimensions, the participant self-assigned a score: from 1 (no problems) to 5 (extreme problems).
The 5 digit health states obtained for each dimension was converted into a single mean index value based on the EQ-5D crosswalk value set for the UK using the time trade-off method.
This index ranges from -0.594 (worst health) to 1.0 (best health).
A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
For subjects who discontinued treatment without disease progression, post-treatment efficacy visits 1, 2, 3 and 5 were conducted every 6 weeks (for the first 12 months since start of treatment) and every 12 weeks (after 12 months since start of treatment) until disease progression
|
Baseline, every 3 weeks from Week 3 until end of treatment, every 6 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), 7 and 28 days post progression through final analysis cutoff date of 08Jan2021 (up to approx. 18 months)
|
Safety run-in Part: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Canakinumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 at pre-dose and end of infusion and 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours (h) post-infusion. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization.
Cmax of canakinumab was calculated from canakinumab plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 at pre-dose and end of infusion and 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours (h) post-infusion. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Safety run-in Part: Time of Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of Canakinumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 at pre-dose and end of infusion and 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours (h) post-infusion. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization. Tmax of canakinumab was calculated from canakinumab plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 at pre-dose and end of infusion and 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours (h) post-infusion. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Safety run-in Part: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of Canakinumab
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 at pre-dose and end of infusion and 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours (h) post-infusion. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization.
AUClast of canakinumab was calculated from canakinumab plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 at pre-dose and end of infusion and 24, 48, 168 and 336 hours (h) post-infusion. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Safety run-in Part: Cmax of Docetaxel
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization.
Cmax of docetaxel was calculated from docetaxel plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Safety run-in Part: Tmax of Docetaxel
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization. Tmax of docetaxel was calculated from docetaxel plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Safety run-in Part: AUClast of Docetaxel
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization.
AUClast of docetaxel was calculated from docetaxel plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Randomized Part: Pre-dose Plasma Trough Concentration (CTrough) of Canakinumab
Time Frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, Cycle 12 Day 1 and Cycle 18 Day 1. Each cycle is 21 days.
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization.
CTrough of canakinumab was calculated from canakinumab plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
|
Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, Cycle 12 Day 1 and Cycle 18 Day 1. Each cycle is 21 days.
|
Randomized Part: Cmax of Docetaxel
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization.
Cmax of docetaxel was calculated from docetaxel plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Randomized Part: Tmax of Docetaxel
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization. Tmax of docetaxel was calculated from docetaxel plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics. Actual recorded sampling times were considered for the calculations. |
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Randomized Part: AUClast of Docetaxel
Time Frame: Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Venous whole blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetics characterization.
AUClast of docetaxel was calculated from docetaxel plasma concentration-time data using non-compartmental methods and summarized using descriptive statistics.
|
Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 4 Day 1 at pre-infusion, end of infusion, and 2, 4 and 6 hours post-dose. Each cycle is 21 days
|
Randomized Part: Canakinumab Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
ADA prevalence at baseline was calculated as the percentage of participants who had an ADA positive result at baseline
|
Baseline
|
Randomized Part: Canakinumab ADA Incidence On-treatment
Time Frame: Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, Cycle 12 Day 1 , end of treatment, and 130 days after end of treatment through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to 18 months). Each cycle is 21 days
|
ADA incidence on-treatment was calculated as the percentage of participants who were treatment-induced ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with ADA-negative sample at baseline) and treatment-boosted ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with titer that is at least the fold titer change greater than the ADA-positive baseline titer)
|
Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1, Cycle 12 Day 1 , end of treatment, and 130 days after end of treatment through final analysis data cutoff date of 08-Jan-2021 (assessed up to 18 months). Each cycle is 21 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Neoplasms
- Lung Diseases
- Neoplasms by Site
- Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
- Thoracic Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
- Bronchial Neoplasms
- Lung Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Tubulin Modulators
- Antimitotic Agents
- Mitosis Modulators
- Docetaxel
Other Study ID Numbers
- CACZ885V2301
- 2018-002480-26 (EudraCT Number)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations.
This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non-Small-Cell Lung
-
WindMIL TherapeuticsBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Lung Cancer Metastatic | Lung Cancer, Non-small Cell | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoAstraZenecaActive, not recruitingStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...Bristol-Myers SquibbCompletedStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IIB Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IB Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Non-Squamous Non-Small...United States
-
Alexander ChiNot yet recruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Carcinoma | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIChina
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Healthy, no Evidence of Disease | Limited Stage Small Cell Lung... and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerCanada
-
Karen KellyBristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI); TransgeneCompletedStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
Stanford UniversityAstraZenecaRecruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIUnited States
Clinical Trials on Canakinumab
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedHereditary Periodic Fevers | Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic ArthritisFrance
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandTerminatedAtrial FibrillationSwitzerland, Germany
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyNovartis PharmaceuticalsCompletedVasculitis | UrticariaGermany
-
NovartisCompletedChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseUnited States
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
Rabin Medical CenterUnknown
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyTerminatedAdult-Onset Still´s DiseaseGermany
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyNovartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsInternational Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Group; Southwest...TerminatedSystemic Juvenile Idiopathic ArthritisUnited States, Argentina, Canada, Switzerland, Germany, United Kingdom, Israel, South Africa, Belgium, Greece, Italy, Spain, France, Brazil, Turkey, Hungary, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Netherlands, Peru, Denmark