Recurrence Score-guiding Chemotherapy in Non-pCR HR Positive HER2 Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Therapy (RSBNAT)

September 6, 2019 updated by: Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Multi Gene Detection Tool Based Recurrence Score-guiding Chemotherapy in Non-pathologic Complete Response HR Positive and HER2 Negative Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Treatment

The luminal subtype of breast cancer means hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR+HER2-), which counted 60%-70% of breast cancer but achieve low pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (7.5%-15%) in neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It is controversial whether additional chemotherapy after surgery is necessary for those non-pCR HR+HER2- patients. Multiple gene is a mature diagnose tool for recurrence score in adjuvant treatment strategy. This study is to investigating the value of multi gene detection tool based recurrence score for guiding additional chemotherapy after surgery in HR+HER2- non-pCR breast cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is designed as stratified cluster randomized, parallel-control research. The HR+HER2- breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (including anthracyclines and taxane, at least 6 cycles) assessed non-pCR are recruited, receiving multiple gene test before neoadjuvant treatment and after surgery. After enrollment, the patients were stratified according to multiple gene test based recurrence risk level (High risk or Low risk) and then randomized into two groups respectively in each cluster: receiving additional chemotherapy (Capecitabine) group or negative control group. The primary endpoint is 2-year disease free survival. The second endpoint is 5-year disease free survival (DFS), 2-year overall survival (OS), 5-year OS, safety of additional chemotherapy. The exploratory endpoint is the variety of multiple gene test based recurrence risk after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-pCR patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Hongjian Yang, MM
  • Phone Number: 8657188122001
  • Email: yhjzlyy@163.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Invasive breast cancer at the first diagnosed
  2. Clinical stage cT1-4cN0-3M0 (AJCC 8th), receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy at least 6 cycles
  3. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen should include anthracyclines and taxane
  4. Primary tumor HR+(ER+ or PR+) and HER2 negative before neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  5. Pathological evaluation non-pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (residual invasive cancer in primary tumor)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Metastasis, recurrent breast cancer or receiving other treatment before neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  2. Pregnant breast cancer
  3. IHC or FISH test of primary tumor confirmed HER2 positive at anytime
  4. Complete fewer than 6 cycles chemotherapy before surgery
  5. Deficiency of surgery after neoadjuvant
  6. Contraindication of chemotherapy or surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Low risk Capecitabine
Patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated as non-pCR have multiple gene test based low recurrence risk receiving capecitabine.
Capecitabine 2500mg/m2/day, d1-d14, every 3 weeks a cycle for 8 cycles
Other Names:
  • additional chemotherapy
No Intervention: Low risk control
Patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated as non-pCR have multiple gene test based low recurrence risk NOT receiving any additional chemotherapy.
Experimental: High risk Capecitabine
Patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated as non-pCR have multiple gene test based high recurrence risk receiving capecitabine.
Capecitabine 2500mg/m2/day, d1-d14, every 3 weeks a cycle for 8 cycles
Other Names:
  • additional chemotherapy
No Intervention: High risk control
Patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated as non-pCR have multiple gene test based high recurrence risk NOT receiving any additional chemotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year DFS
Time Frame: 2 years after randomized
disease-free survival rate in 2 years
2 years after randomized

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
5-year DFS
Time Frame: 5 years after randomized
disease-free survival rate in 5 years
5 years after randomized
2-year OS
Time Frame: 2 years after randomized
overall survival rate in 2 years
2 years after randomized
5-year OS
Time Frame: 5 years after randomized
overall survival rate in 5 years
5 years after randomized
Aside effect
Time Frame: 5 years
any aside effect induced by additional chemotherapy (Capecitabine)
5 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
variety of multiple gene based recurrence score
Time Frame: half year after randomized
recurrence score before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
half year after randomized

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xingfei Yu, MD, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 6, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on Capecitabine

3
Subscribe