HLA 10/10 Matched Unrelated Donor vs Haploidentical Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (MacHaploMud)

August 30, 2018 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Randomized Prospective Phase III Clinical Trial Comparing HLA 10/10 Matched Unrelated Donor and Haploidentical Allogenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation After Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen

The MAC-HAPLO-MUD trial is a randomized prospective phase III trial comparing HLA 10/10 matched unrelated donor and haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after myeloablative conditioning regimen in patients, age 15 years or older, with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) or Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) or Myeloproliferative Syndrome (SMP) or Myelodysplastic Syndromes (SMD) and requiring allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Primary endpoint is the 1-year progression free survival without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An unrelated adult donor who is HLA-matched to the recipient at the allele-level (at HLA-A, -B, -C, -DQB1 and -DRB1) is considered the best choice in the absence of an HLA-matched sibling for patients needing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT).

However, using matched unrelated donors (MUD) is limited by (1) a prolonged time to identify and schedule donation for some MUD allowing some patients to relapse before transplantation can be performed, and (2) limited availability of fully HLA-MUD for the non-Caucasian population.

Alternative donors are used for transplantation in patients without a fully-MUD including single HLA mismatched unrelated donor, unrelated umbilical cord blood and grafts from haploidentical related donors but are associated with higher non-relapse mortality and delayed immune reconstitution.

A more recent strategy for haploidentical (haplo) related donor SCT (haplo-SCT) has improved dramatically outcomes using T-cell replete grafts with administration of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy).

From retrospective studies, haplo-SCT with PTCy are associated with similar overall and progression-free survivals as with MUD stem cell transplantation (MUD-SCT), but with lower rates of toxicity and graft versus host disease (GvHD), and thus potentially better results than MUD-SCT after reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimen. Haplo-SCT with PTCy is thus highly discussed nowadays motivating prospective trials to confirm the benefit of this procedure.

In the setting of a myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimen in adults with high risk hematological malignancies, few retrospective non-controlled registry studies recently suggest that outcomes after haplo-SCT using PTCy approach might also be superior in terms of GVHD free survival to that after MUD stem cell transplantation (MUD-SCT).

The investigators propose to address this question, in a randomized prospective phase III clinical trial comparing HLA 10/10 MUD and haplo-SCT after MAC regimen. The stem cell source will be bone marrow for haploidentical SCT and peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) for HLA-matched unrelated transplantation.

The primary endpoint is the 1-year progression free survival without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

344

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 53 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • With AML/ALL/SMD/SMP requiring allogeneic stem cell transplantation
  • In complete response (CR) for AML/ALL or in CR, or partial response (PR) or non pre-treated for SMD/SMP *
  • Without a HLA matched related donor available
  • With a good probability to have a HLA-10/10 matched donor available (the patient needs to have at least 5 MUD identified within the book "BMDW (Bone Marrow Donors Worldwide)"
  • With identification of a haploidentical donor (brother, sister, parents, adult children or cousin)
  • Absence of donor specific antibody (DSA) detected in the patient with a MFI ≥ 2000 (antibodies directed towards the distinct haplotype between donor and recipient)

With usual criteria for hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT):

  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤ 2
  • No severe and uncontrolled infection
  • Cardiac function compatible with high dose of cyclophosphamide
  • Adequate organ function: aspartate transaminase (ASAT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) ≤ 2N, total bilirubin ≤ 1.5N, creatinine clearance ≥30ml/min (except if those abnormalities are linked to the hematological disease)

    • With health insurance coverage
    • Understand informed consent or optimal treatment and follow-up
    • Contraception methods must be prescribed during all the duration of the research and using effective contraceptive methods during treatment and within 12 months for women and 6 months for men after the last dose of cyclophosphamide
    • Having signed a written informed consent (2 parents for patients aged less than 18)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of donor specific antibody (DSA) with a MFI ≥ 2000 detected in the patient
  • History of Cancer in the last 5 years (except basal cell carcinoma of the skin or "in situ" carcinoma of the cervix)
  • Uncontrolled infection
  • Seropositivity for HIV or HTLV-1 or active hepatitis B or C defined by a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatic cytolysis due to HBV
  • Yellow fever vaccine within 2 months before transplantation
  • Uncontrolled coronary insufficiency, recent myocardial infarction <6 month, current manifestations of heart failure, uncontrolled cardiac rhythm disorders, ventricular ejection fraction <50%
  • Heart failure according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) (II or more)
  • Urinary tract obstruction
  • Contraindications to treatments used during the research
  • Preexisting acute hemorrhagic cystitis
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance <30ml / min
  • Pregnancy ( β- human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG positive)) or breast-feeding
  • Any debilitating medical or psychiatric illness which would preclude the realization of the SCT or the understanding of the protocol
  • Under protection by law (tutorship or curatorship)
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with the protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Haploidentical donor stem cell transplantation
The stem cell source will be bone marrow for haploidentical transplantation.The bone marrow collection is carried out according to the practice of each centre with a minimal target dose of 3x108 TNC/kg.
The algorithm for selection of haploidentical donor has been defined by the french society for stem cell transplantation The stem cell source will be bone marrow for haploidentical transplantation.The bone marrow collection is carried out according to the practice of each centre with a minimal target dose of 3x108 TNC/kg.
Active Comparator: HLA 10/10 MUD stem cell transplantation
The stem cell source will be peripheral blood stem cell for HLA-matched unrelated transplantation.Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) for HLA-matched unrelated SCT will be mobilized by G-CSF (Neupogen®) administered to the donor from Day-4 to Day-1 subcutaneously (10µg/kg/day) with the minimal target dose of 4.106 CD34+ cells/kg.
HLA 10/10 matched unrelated donor myeloablative transplantation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival, without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD.
Time Frame: 12 months

One year progression free survival, without acute grade II-IV GvHD and without moderate and severe chronic GvHD.

-Relapse evaluation:

For myeloid malignancies, the relapse will be defined by the reappearance of leukemic cells after SCT.

For ALL, the relapse will be defined by: the reappearance of leukemic cells after SCT and/or an increase of at least 50 % of the smallest measure of any lymphnode considered abnormal in the pre-transplantation period for patients in partial response and in non-responders and/or the appearance of any new lesion in comparison with the pre-transplantation period evaluation.

- GvHD evaluation:

Grading of acute GVHD will be performed according to the classification of Glusckberg.

Grading of chronic GVHD will be performed according to the NIH classification.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Time interval between indication of stem cell transplantation (SCT) and transplant
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Engraftment
Time Frame: at 24 months
Engraftment: at least 3 consecutive days with neutrophils > 0.5 G/L, with platelets > 20 G/L
at 24 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 1 month
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
at 1 month
Numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 1 month
Absolute numbers of platelets
at 1 month
Numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 2 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
at 2 months
Numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 2 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
at 2 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 3 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
at 3 months
Numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 3 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
at 3 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 6 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
at 6 months
Numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 6 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
at 6 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 12 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
at 12 months
Numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 12 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
at 12 months
Numbers of neutrophils
Time Frame: at 24 months
Absolute numbers of neutrophils
at 24 months
Numbers of platelets
Time Frame: at 24 months
Absolute numbers of platelets
at 24 months
Use of growth factors
Time Frame: at 12 months
Use of growth factors for poor hematopoietic reconstitution
at 12 months
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 1 month post transplantation
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, Natural Killer (NK), regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 1 month post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 3 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 3 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 6 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 6 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 12 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 12 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution
Time Frame: at 24 months post transplantation
Immune reconstitution by analyzing T, B, NK, regulatory T cell levels in the peripheral blood
at 24 months post transplantation
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 1 month
at 1 month
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Iron overload estimation
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months
Chimerism
Time Frame: at 1 month
at 1 month
Chimerism
Time Frame: at 3 months
at 3 months
Chimerism
Time Frame: at 6 months
at 6 months
Chimerism
Time Frame: at 12 months
at 12 months
Acute GvHD
Time Frame: at 24 months
Incidence of acute GvHD
at 24 months
First line treatment
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Response to steroids
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Treatment courses for refractory aGVHD
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Relapse
Time Frame: 24 months
Incidence of relapse
24 months
Severe infections (CTAE grade 3-4)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of CMV
12 months
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of EBV reactivation
12 months
Veno-occlusive disease (VOD)
Time Frame: 3 months
Incidence of veno-occlusive disease
3 months
Severity of veno-occlusive disease (VOD)
Time Frame: 3 months

Severity of veno-occlusive disease. VOD severity will be assessed using new EBMT criteria (Mohty et al., 2016). EBMT criteria for grading VOD severity in adult patients are based on the level of bilirubin and its rate of change, liver function (transaminase), weight increase, renal function and the kinetic of their onset (Mohty et al., 2016). This grading system is divided into five categories as following: mild, moderate; severe, very severe; and death.

Mohty M., Malard F., Abecassis M., Aerts E., Alaskar AS. et al. (2016). Revised diagnosis and severity criteria for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in adult patients: a new classification from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplantation 51,906-912.

3 months
Cardiac toxicities
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of cardiac toxicities
12 months
Non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: 24 months
Time between death and inclusion
24 months
Quality of life post transplantation: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Time Frame: 1 week post-transplantation

Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.

EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.

1 week post-transplantation
Quality of life at 3 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Time Frame: 3 months

Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.

EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.

3 months
Quality of life at 6 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Time Frame: 6 months

Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.

EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.

6 months
Quality of life at 12 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Time Frame: 12 months

Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.

EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.

12 months
Quality of life at 24 months: EORTC QLQ-C30- v3
Time Frame: 24 months

Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.

EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. Fayers PM et al. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group. EORTC, 2001. ISBN: 2-9300.

24 months
Number of new days of hospitalization after the hospitalization for transplantation
Time Frame: at 24 months
at 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Haplo donor stem cell transplantation

3
Subscribe