Nicotinamide Riboside for Diabetic Neuropathy (NiRiD)

March 24, 2022 updated by: James W. Russell, MD, MS, University of Maryland, Baltimore

Nicotinamide Riboside in Diabetic Polyneuropathy

At the current time there is no effective disease modifying therapy for diabetic neuropathy (DN). The proposed study design employs a quantifiable early measure of DN, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD), allowing for accurate assessment of actual nerve fiber density. Preclinical data supports the use of Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) as a potential therapy for diabetic neuropathy. Phase I data indicates safety in humans. This study seeks to investigate the use of Niagen® (NR) as a potential treatment for diabetic neuropathy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus or impaired glucose tolerance over a 6 month period. The endpoint measures in addition to the IENFD with determine changes in clinical and electrophysiological outcomes, quality of life and biochemical measures.

Study Overview

Status

Suspended

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

At the current time there is no effective disease modifying therapy for diabetic neuropathy (DN). Previous failed trials of therapy have often targeted individuals with advanced, severe neuropathy. There is a particularly strong incentive to treat neuropathy early in its course while the severity is still mild and to target participants who have impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or who have well controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The proposed study design employs a quantifiable early measure of DN, intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD) of the thigh, allowing for accurate assessment of actual nerve fiber density over time, while also incorporating measures of pain and quality of life. Preclinical data supports the use of NR as a potential therapy for diabetic neuropathy. Phase I data indicates safety in humans.

The most common form of diabetes mellitus, T2DM, is projected to affect an estimated 366 million people worldwide by 2030. The lifetime incidence of polyneuropathy is approximately 45% and neuropathy of any type approximately 59% of in patients with T2DM. Studies of nerve conduction tests performed at the time of diabetes mellitus diagnosis demonstrate that neuropathy is already present in patients when the neuropathy is still subclinical. Furthermore, DN leads to severe morbidity, high mortality, major physical disability, poor quality of life, and high cost with estimated total annual costs of $22 billion (www.diabetes.org). Due to the complex structure and anatomy of the peripheral nervous system, DN presents with a very broad spectrum of clinical symptoms and deficits, including severe pain, sensory deficits, foot ulcers and amputations. Despite the high morbidity associated with DN, most randomized clinical trials evaluating therapies for established DN have been disappointing. To date there is no pathogenetic treatment for this condition. Currently, tight glycemic control is the only convincing strategy to prevent or delay the development of DN in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. There is less convincing evidence that tight glycemic control improves neuropathy with T2DM.

DN is a diffuse, symmetrical injury to the entire peripheral nervous system. The smallest Aδ thinly-myelinated fibers and the unmyelinated C-fibers are likely the earliest to undergo damage in the natural history of DN. These fibers mediate pain, temperature discrimination, touch perception and autonomic responses, and constitute over 80% of peripheral nerve fibers. When determining the effect of a therapeutic intervention in DN it is important to utilize outcome measures that best identify change in disease. Although both large and small fiber neuropathy occur in T2DM, a small-fiber neuropathy is more common. Importantly, developing appropriate endpoints has been a problem in DN because many of the endpoints have proved too insensitive in clinical trials. For example, there is a need to establish content validity in clinical scales. IENFD is a sensitive and reliable measure in determining change in early DN. Furthermore, IENFD directly correlates with increasing DN severity, and is safe as easy to perform and IENFD currently represents a gold standard in measuring change in small fiber neuropathy. Thus, IENFD was selected as the most appropriate endpoint measure in this clinical trial. The morphometric quantification of IENFD is easily measured from a skin biopsy and this is used as part of routine clinical practice. The skin biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure and less than 1% of participants have mild adverse events such as bleeding, infection, or delayed healing. Inter-observer variability for the assessment of IENFD demonstrates good agreement, especially with assessment at the thigh. Patient refusal rate for this procedure is minimal (less than 1 %).

This is a phase II, single center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of NR compared to placebo on measures of small fiber neuropathy in participants with IGT or T2DM and mild DN. Participants with be randomly assigned to either NR 0.5 grams twice a day (total 1 gram/day) or matched placebo in a 1:1 ratio. Participants in the active group will start with a 1 gram/day dose because of the very low risk of adverse events with NR. The 1 gram/day dose will be taken continuously for 6 months. In addition (if they have not already received this information) all participants will be given general diabetic nutritional advice and general advice to exercise for approximately 150 minutes per week. This represents current standard of care information provided to all patients with impaired glucose regulation and DN.

Primary efficacy measure: change in the thigh IENFD at 6 months compared to baseline. Secondary efficacy measure: change in the distal leg IENFD at 6 months compared to baseline.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

54

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Impaired glucose tolerance or controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus at the time of screening or within three months of screening*.
  2. The hemoglobin A1c may be normal, but should be less than 9%.
  3. If diabetic participants are on medication, they should be stable on medication for at least 3 months prior to entering the study. Addition or change in antidiabetic medication (if on medication) after enrollment does not affect participation or group assignment.
  4. Impaired glucose regulation is the most likely cause of the neuropathy.
  5. Mild diabetic polyneuropathy as defined by the Toronto Diabetic Neuropathy Expert Group consensus criteria.
  6. Age 30 (to exclude patients with type 1 diabetes) to 80 years inclusive.
  7. Medically stable at the time of enrollment.
  8. Willing to accept randomization assignment and compliance with the study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Women of childbearing potential must be using an acceptable method of contraception to prevent pregnancy when they are enrolled in the study.
  2. Patient must agree to take an alternative medication to Warfarin or Factor X inhibitors when undergoing a skin biopsy.
  3. Neuropathy due to factors other than type 2 diabetes mellitus based on careful clinical and laboratory evaluation by the study physicians.
  4. Abnormal liver function tests, including alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and bilirubin.
  5. Current severe medical conditions that are active on the day of screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants randomized to placebo will take 2 capsules by mouth twice a day for 6 months. The placebo capsules are matched to the NR capsules.
Placebo capsules matched to the experimental drug and taken orally as 2 capsules twice daily for 6 months.
Experimental: Niagen®
Participants randomized to Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) will take 250 mg capsules. Participants will take 2 capsules by mouth twice a day (1000 mg) for 6 months
Niagen® (3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride - NR) will be the experimental treatment, at a dose of 1000 mg/day taken as two 250 mg capsules twice daily for 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Nicotinamide Riboside
  • 3-(Aminocarbonyl)-1-β-D-ribofuranosyl-pyridinium chloride

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thigh Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density
Time Frame: 6 months.
Change in the proximal thigh Intra-Epidermal Nerve Fiber Density as assessed by skin biopsy. Smaller values indicate worse neuropathy. Normative ranges depend on age and gender.
6 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distal lower limb intraepidermal nerve fiber density
Time Frame: 6 months.
Change in the distal leg Intra-epidermal Nerve Fiber Density as assessed by biopsy. Smaller values indicate worse neuropathy. Normative ranges depend on age and gender.
6 months.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Scale
Time Frame: 6 months.
Modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Scale to assess clinical symptoms and signs of diabetic neuropathy
6 months.
Total Neuropathy Score (Clinical)
Time Frame: 6 months.
Total Neuropathy Score (Clinical)
6 months.
The Neuropathy Total Symptom Score (NTSS-6)
Time Frame: 6 months.
The Neuropathy Total Symptom Score ranges from 0 to 21.96 points with higher scores indicating a worse symptom score
6 months.
Pain Quality Assessment Scale
Time Frame: 6 months.
To evaluate the neuropathic pain and non-neuropathic pain. The Pain Quality Assessment Scale was developed from the neuropathy Pain Scale and is a 20 item scale that assesses both neuropathic pain and non-neuropathic pain. Higher score indicate worse pain.
6 months.
Survey of Autonomic Symptoms
Time Frame: 6 months.
Survey of Autonomic Symptoms to assess symptoms of peripheral autonomic function. The scale varies depending on gender. Higher scores indicate higher levels of autonomic symptoms.
6 months.
Neuro Quality of Life Measure
Time Frame: 6 months.
This measures quality of life and is an 11 item scale with each item scored from 0 to create an aggregate scale. High scores are worse.
6 months.
Nerve Conduction Studies
Time Frame: 6 months.
Nerve Conduction Studies to assess changes in nerve conduction. The amplitudes of the sural sensory, fibular motor, tibial motor and their respective distal latencies, and conduction velocities are obtained. Data will be used from individual measurements and using a mega score of combined variables. Lower scores may indicate neuropathy.
6 months.
Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy
Time Frame: 6 months.
The expiration:inspiration ratio will be measured. Normative data varies depending on age, gender and other factors. Lower scores may indicate cardiac autonomic neuropathy.
6 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James W Russell, MD, University of Maryland School of Medicine & Department of Veterans' Affairs

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 24, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Neuropathy Peripheral

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe