Exercise in Anxiety and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders

September 29, 2021 updated by: Universitaet Innsbruck

Exercise in Anxiety and Posttraumatic Stress Disorders - a Randomized Controlled Clinical Pilot Trial

Aim: Aerobic and resistance exercise showed anxiolytic effects in clinical populations. Climbing could further enhance self-efficacy. Aim of the study is to examine whether climbing exercise and aerobic exercise, compared to social contact control, reduces symptoms of disease in out-patients with anxiety disorder (AD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Further analyses are aiming to reveal differences between climbing - and aerobic exercise.

Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial Participants: Thirty out-patients diagnosed with International Classification of Disease-Version 10 (ICD-10) (F40, F41, F43.1) for AD or PTSD.

Intervention: Out-patients will be assigned randomly to a climbing exercise group (a), aerobic exercise group (Nordic walking) (b) or social contact control group (c).

Measurements: Primary outcome is symptom severity in AD or Post Traumatic Stress Disorders. Further secondary outcomes are evaluated by psychological questionnaires assessing depression, worry symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy and affective responses. Metabolites of neurotransmitters, immune-activation markers and anthropometric data will be additionally provided as secondary physiological outcomes.

Duration: Intervention duration is four weeks with 2 x 75 min for every group (climbing exercise, aerobic exercise, social contact control). Measurement points are set at the beginning (t1), at the end of the intervention (t2) and 3 (t3) and 6 (t4) months follow-up.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed research project is designed as a randomized controlled clinical trial with three arms. The efficacy of a climbing exercise program, an aerobic exercise program and a social contact control group on primary and secondary study outcome will be investigated (see Figure 1). Patients will be first screened by the outpatient-unit of the Department of Psychosomatics at the Medical University of Innsbruck or remitted through the treating staff network community. When assessed as eligible for the study, a group of up to ten out-patients will be randomly selected and invited to an informative meeting. Patients receive study information and time tables for their group attendances. The intervention will start within the following week and will end four weeks after beginning. Follow-up assessments will take place three and six months after intervention.

In addition to the AD/PTSD symptom screening, secondary study outcomes will be assessed:

  • at study inclusion (t1)
  • at the end of the intervention (t2)
  • three months after the intervention (t3)
  • six months after the intervention (t4)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tyrol
      • Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria, 6020
        • University of Innsbruck

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ICD-10 diagnosis of Anxiety Disorder or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: F40, F41, F43.1;
  • age range: 18-65
  • written informed consent
  • stable medication (if needed) for at least 3 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acute psychosis or suicidal behaviour
  • medical contraindication to physical activity (assessed by a clinician)
  • cognitive deficits
  • problems with German language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Climbing Exercise Group
At the beginning of each session, a standardized body-centered, mind-setting warmup of ten minutes will take place. The general warm-up will be followed by climbing specific warm-up, which will consist of bouldering (20-30 minutes). Afterwards the rope climbing session will start. Climbing sessions also contain several sport-specific skill-development training sessions to familiarize the participants with gear and rope management, to acquire footwork and route finding, and to locate good belay spots and resting positions while climbing. At the end of the climbing session a short cool-down of five minutes will be executed.
All interventions are identical in their duration. To fulfill the WHO guidelines of health enhancing activity (minimum 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week), two 75 minutes exercise sessions per week will take place. After meeting the inclusion criteria and after allocation to one of the three groups, patients will receive their timetable with the exercise or group session dates.
Experimental: Aerobic Exercise Group
As the climbing exercise group, the aerobic exercise group will start with a ten minutes body-centered, mind-setting warm-up, followed by 60 minutes of Nordic walking and five minutes cool down. A physiotherapist or sport scientist will instruct and guide the group. Nordic walking will be performed at a moderate pace at varying paths.
All interventions are identical in their duration. To fulfill the WHO guidelines of health enhancing activity (minimum 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week), two 75 minutes exercise sessions per week will take place. After meeting the inclusion criteria and after allocation to one of the three groups, patients will receive their timetable with the exercise or group session dates.
Active Comparator: Social Contact Control Group
Patients allocated to the social contact control group will receive the same amount of social interaction as the exercise groups. A physiotherapist or sport scientist will be present while participants watch movies with relevant content to disease followed by interactive group discussions. This group is required to control for the impact of social contact/support on AD/PTSD and secondary outcomes.
All interventions are identical in their duration. To fulfill the WHO guidelines of health enhancing activity (minimum 150 minutes of moderate exercise per week), two 75 minutes exercise sessions per week will take place. After meeting the inclusion criteria and after allocation to one of the three groups, patients will receive their timetable with the exercise or group session dates.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (t1) Symptoms of Anxiety at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; Beck & Steer, 1990) The BAI ranges from 0 and 63 points with lower points indicating less symptoms of anxiety
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Change from Baseline (t1) Symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Civil Version (PCL-5; Weathers et al., 2013) The PCL-5 ranges from 0 and 80 points with lower points indicating less symptoms of PTSD The PCL-5 ranges from 0 and 80 points with lower points indicating less symptoms of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline (t1) Depression at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II; Beck et al., 1996) The BDI-II ranges from 0 and 63 points with lower points indicating less symptoms of depression.
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Change from Baseline (t1) Worry Symptoms at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Penn-State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ; Meyer et al., 1990) The PSWQ ranges from 16 and 80 points with lower points indicating less worries.
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Change from Baseline (t1) Quality of Life (WHO) at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF; WHOQOL Group, 1998) The WHOQOL-BREF ranges from 5 and 130 points with lower points indicating less quality of life.
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Change from Baseline (t1) Self Efficacy at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE; Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995) The GSE ranges from 4 and 40 points with lower points indicating less resources in self efficacy.
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Affective Responses_a
Time Frame: 1 minute before each intervention, after 38 minutes, after 75 minutes
Feeling Scale (FS; Hardy & Rejeski, 1989) The FS ranges from +5 to -5 points with lower points indicating low affective valence.
1 minute before each intervention, after 38 minutes, after 75 minutes
Affective Responses_b
Time Frame: 1 minute before each intervention, after 38 minutes, after 75 minutes
Felt Arousal Scale (FAS; Svebak & Murgatroyd, 1985) The FAS ranges from 1 to 6 points with lower points indicating low level of arousal.
1 minute before each intervention, after 38 minutes, after 75 minutes
Affective Responses_c
Time Frame: 1 minute before each intervention, after 75 minutes
The Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) The PANAS measures two subscales, positive affect (points ranging from 10 to 50) and negative affect (points ranging from 10 to 50) Lower points on positive subscale indicates low level of positive affect, low points on negative affect subscale indicates low level of negative affect.
1 minute before each intervention, after 75 minutes
Affective Responses_d
Time Frame: 38 minutes after beginning of intervention
Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE; Borg, 1998)
38 minutes after beginning of intervention
Change from Baseline (t1) Analyses of neurotransmitter metabolites at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
tryptophan-kynurenine and the phenylalanine-tyrosine pathways
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
Change from Baseline (t1) Analyses of immune-activation markers at four weeks (t2), three months after intervention (t3) and six months after intervention (t4)
Time Frame: 1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours
neopterin and pro-inflammatory cytokines
1 hour before intervention, after 672 hours, after 2328 hours, after 4488 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Barbara Sperner-Unterweger, Prof. MD, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Innsbruck Medical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Climbing

3
Subscribe