AMBULAPSE STUDY Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model. (AMBULAPSE)

February 6, 2024 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Feasibility Study on Laparoscopic Double-mesh Sacrocolpopexy With or Without Robotic Assistance, in Female Patients Presenting With Symptomatic Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Based on an Outpatient Treatment Model.

Pelvic organ prolapse is an increasingly common functional disorder which affects approximately 30 to 40% of the female population, 12% of whom have a symptomatic form, with a psychological, physical and social impact. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy represents the surgical "gold standard" for the treatment of this functional disorder. It aims to suspend the vaginal vault by means of a prosthesis. The patient satisfaction rate is evaluated at 94% with low overall complication rate, evaluated at 11%.

Pelvic organ prolapse surgery is a common, with an estimated 30,000 procedures carried out in France in 2013 (excluding hysterectomy) (2013 ATIH data), and the number will increase in the future due to increasing life expectancy. 13% of women will undergo this type of procedure. The French General Directorate of Health Care Supply (DGOS) deems outpatient surgery to be the benchmark for surgical activity in all eligible patients, and has expressed the need for recommendations and tools for supporting its development. The rate of outpatient surgery for prolapse remains low in France (6.1%, 2015 ATIH data), while it is 25% in the US and 56% in Denmark. The average duration of hospital stays for DRG N81.2 (first degree uterine prolapse) in 2015 was 3.43 days. These procedures have been the subject of publications concerning outpatient care and involving low numbers of patients, with the exception of the publication by Sinhal which involved 111 patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In our study, the investigators propose to evaluate the success rate for outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with or without robotic assistance in screened patients. With this aim in mind, the investigators will conduct a national multicenter prospective study including 80 female patients. Successful outpatient treatment is defined by the absence of conventional inpatient admission with 24H after surgery, the indications for admission being a CHUNG Score < 9, one perioperative complication, postoperative urinary retention requiring reinsertion of a urinary catheter. The outpatient success rate for other surgical techniques such as cholecystectomy or laparoscopic hysterectomy is above 90% in the literature. Envisaging an equivalent rate after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, our population size would make it possible to obtain precision +/- 5.3% for estimation of this proportion. The patients are followed up for 1 month with a postoperative visit at 30 days, during which the efficacy of the technique is evaluated using conventional indicators (POP-Q; ICIQ, USP, PFDI-20, PISQ-12, PFIQ-7, etc.). Once completed, this preliminary investigation will make it possible to define a reference value for successful outpatient sacrocolpopexy, which has not yet been published, which may be used as a basis for a larger scale randomized study that would aim to compare the efficacy of outpatient treatment, with conventional inpatient treatment, for efficient patient management

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Clamart, France, 92140
        • Recruiting
        • Hopital Antoine Beclere - Aphp
        • Contact:
          • Xavier DEFFIEUX, MD
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Nantes
        • Contact:
          • Marie-Aimée PERROUIN-VERBE, MD
      • Nice, France, 06200
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Nice - Hopital L'Archet
        • Contact:
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
        • Recruiting
        • CH Lyon sud
        • Contact:
          • Alain RUFFION, MD, PhD
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Foch
        • Contact:
          • Adrien VIDART, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • woman between 40 and 80 years old
  • Patient with significant prolapse POP-Q ≥ 2
  • BMI <30
  • ASA score ≤ 2
  • sterile ECBU

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria related to the pathology or the organ:

    • History of pelvic cancer surgery
    • History of prolapse surgery
    • History of pelvic irradiation
    • Laying a concomitant urethral strip
    • Cervico-vaginal smear test not up to date.
    • Patient pregnant or having a desire for pregnancy
  • Criteria related to concomitant treatments:

    • Cefazoline allergy
    • Taking the following medications within 48 hours
  • Plavix®
  • Vitamin K / Low Molecular Weight Healing Heparin

    • Contraindication to ambulatory care for medical reasons
  • Sleep apnea syndrome
  • Cardiopulmonary pathology
  • Psychiatric pathology
  • Hemorrhagic risk
  • Diabetes imbalanced
  • Unbalanced Hypertension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: outpatient laparoscopic
Patients will have laparoscopic outpatients. The procedure is identical to that performed in hospital. What changes is that the patient will return home at night if her condition allows it.
The intervention is a outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with robotic assistance.
The intervention is a outpatient laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy without robotic assistance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful outpatient treatment
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
Successful outpatient treatment is defined by the absence of conventional inpatient admission with 24H after surgery, the indications for admission being a CHUNG Score < 9, one perioperative complication, postoperative urinary retention requiring reinsertion of a urinary catheter
24 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The percentage of failure of the outpatient
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery
The percentage of failure of the outpatient is defined by the number of patients with a CHUNG score <9 in the outpatient department that does not allow the discharge of the patient or her admission to conventional hospitalization.
24 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brannwel TIBI, MD, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18-PP-12

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on outpatient laparoscopic

3
Subscribe