Safety and Performance of PEEK Anchors in Extremities

September 27, 2024 updated by: Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Safety and Performance of PEEK Anchors (DYNOMITE, SPYROMITE, RAPTOMITE, FOOTPRINT Ultra PK SL) in Extremities

Safety and performance of the study devices in extremities up to 12 months post-surgery

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 3K7
        • Fowler Kennedy Sport Medicine Clinic
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • OrthoCarolina
    • Ohio
      • Chardon, Ohio, United States, 44024
        • Precision Orthopaedic Specialties, Inc.
    • Texas
      • Grapevine, Texas, United States, 76051
        • Foot and Ankle Associates of North Texas-Grapevine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Subjects who have undergone extremity joint repair using the study devices, PEEK Anchors (DYNOMITE, SPYROMITE, RAPTOMITE, FOOTPRINT Ultra PK SL)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have undergone extremity joint repair using the study devices.
  • Subjects aged 18 years and older at the time of surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is entered in another investigational drug, biologic, or device study or has been treated with an investigational product within 12 months post-operative.
  • Subjects who are < 3 months post-operative

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Extremity Over a Time Period of 6 Months After Intervention
Time Frame: 6 months

Clinical success was defined as extremity repairs without signs of device failure and/or re-intervention as assessed by the surgeon. Specifically, clinical success was considered "Yes" based on the following 3 main criteria:

  • no inflammatory or allergic response
  • no device-related adverse event (AE)
  • no device deficiencies (DDs) leading to revision surgery (re intervention) on the index extremity
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Clinical Success of the Study Devices in the Extremity Over a Time Period of 12 Months After Intervention
Time Frame: 12 months

Clinical success was defined as extremity repairs without signs of device failure and/or re-intervention as assessed by the surgeon. Specifically, clinical success was considered "Yes" based on the following 3 main criteria:

  • no inflammatory or allergic response
  • no device-related adverse event (AE)
  • no device deficiencies (DDs) leading to revision surgery (reintervention) on the index extremity
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Count of Participants With Range of Motion (ROM) Full Functional Arc
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Range of motion defined as the participant having a full functional arc "Yes" or "No" at 6 month and 12 month post-operative visits.
6 and 12 months
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Pain
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
The VAS pain score is presented on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. A score of 0 represents no pain and a score of 10 indicates extreme/unbearable pain. The VAS rating was recorded retrospectively, per standard of care at 6 and 12 months post-surgery.
6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Judth Horner, Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bunionectomy

Subscribe