Virtual Reality and Occupational Performance, Satisfaction, and Quality of Life of Older Adults

January 15, 2019 updated by: Sara Benham, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

The Effect of Immersive Virtual Reality on Perceived Occupational Performance, Perceived Occupational Satisfaction, and Quality of Life of Older Adults

Older adult participants will complete eight immersive virtual reality (VR) sessions with the researcher, within five weeks (no more than two sessions per week may be scheduled). The screening process and assessment measures are not included in the five weeks of virtual reality. Sessions will consist of 30 minutes of use of the virtual reality goggles. During the virtual reality sessions, participants will select from a list of Oculus Go apps related to their self-identified occupational performance issues. Participants are expected to complete the session while seated with the VR set secured on their head.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Virtual reality (VR) may promote engagement in meaningful daily activities that is tailored to the individual's skill level, need, and significance to their individual context. There is limited research on measurable changes in perceived meaningful daily activities after utilizing immersive VR, specifically with a head mounted display. Only in recent years have head-mounted displays become less expensive and more commercially available for research and patron purchase. At the low cost of $250, the device is within the reach of many older adult community centers for leisure and recreational use. The researchers will measure changes in occupational performance, occupational satisfaction, and quality of life for the older adult members of a community center, after eight immersive VR sessions. Sessions will consist of 30 minutes of use of the virtual reality goggles. During the virtual reality sessions, participants will select from a list of Oculus Go apps related to their self-identified occupational performance issues. Participants are expected to complete the session while seated with the VR set secured on their head.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19128
        • Recruiting
        • Journey's Way
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The aim is to recruit community-dwelling, healthy older adults from one community center. Subjects will be excluded if they receive a score of 17 or less on the MoCA because this score is associated with individuals with Alzheimer's Disease (Trzepacz, Hochstetler, Wang, Walker, & Saykin, 2015). The second exclusion, for safety purposes, is recommended by the Oculus Go user manual.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Older adults aged 55+ that attend Journey's Way
  2. Members need to attend least twice a week

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Score of 17 or less on the MoCA
  2. A self-report a history of any of the following: Seizures, epilepsy, dizziness, vertigo, or motion sickness, any current contagious skin and eye conditions, experience sensitivity to light, have or use hearing aids, and a pacemaker and/or a defibrillator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Immersive virtual reality
Participants will receive eight 30-minute sessions of immersive virtual reality.
At the start of every session, the participants' top five occupational problems will be reviewed, and a list of apps corresponding to the desired occupational problem will be offered through the immersive virtual reality device (Oculus Go). There will be eight 30-minute virtual reality sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Canadian Occupational Therapy Performance Measure (COPM)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The COPM is a standardized outcome measure that identifies an individual's perceived occupational performance and occupational satisfaction and detects change in these areas over time. Through a semi-structured interview, individuals will identify their difficulties with self-care, leisure, and productivity (Law et al., 2005). The client is asked to rate the importance of each of the occupations to his/her life using a 10-point rating scale (1 to 10). Then, the client will rate the performance and satisfaction of the occupations on a 10-point rating scale (1 to 10). Then, the average performance satisfaction is calculated (1 to 10) and the average satisfaction is calculated (1 to 10). Higher scores indicate better outcomes.
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
World Health Organization Quality of Life BREF (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
The WHOQOL-BREF is an assessment used to measure an individual's perceived quality of life. It has 26 items across the following four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. Items are scored on a scale of 1 to 5 (a higher score is a more favorable outcome). Raw scores are calculated of each domain, and then scores may be transformed to scores ranging from 4 to 20 within each domain.
10 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sara Benham, OTD, OTR/L, University of the Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

December 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1341686

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aging

Clinical Trials on Immersive virtual reality

3
Subscribe