- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03840525
A Mind Body Intervention to Reduce Symptoms Among People Aging With HIV
March 8, 2024 updated by: Florida International University
This study will develop and pilot test a qigong intervention with older people (50 and over) living with HIV.
Participants (n=48) will be randomly assigned to one of 3 conditions: the qigong intervention, a sham qigong intervention, and a usual standard of care group.
The study will determine the acceptability and feasibility of the study.
If found effective, the qigong intervention will also improve the psychological and physical symptoms of older people living with HIV.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Half of those infected with HIV in the United States are over 50 years of age; this is expected to increase to 70% by 2020.
Yet, few interventions exist for older people living with HIV/AIDS that address psychological symptoms, and none that address physical symptoms, both of which are prevalent in this population.
There is a need to find innovative and accessible interventions that can help older people living with HIV/AIDS to manage their symptoms.
Mind-body interventions, like Tai chi and Qi gong (TCQ), improves both physical and psychological health, and might also promote immune functioning.
TCQ is a series of slow, low-impact meditative movements that integrates breath work, meditation, and stances.
The investigators propose the refinement, adaptation, acceptability and feasibility testing of a standardized TCQ intervention shown efficacious with cancer patients, to an ethnically diverse population of older people living with HIV/AIDS, with the goal of enhancing their ability to manage psychological and physical symptoms.
Thus, this study proposes three aims: (i) to refine and culturally adapt a TCQ intervention protocol for a diverse sample of older people living with HIV/AIDS (50 years of age or older); (ii) to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the TCQ intervention, a sham qigong control condition, and a standard of care control condition for older people living with HIV/AIDS (n = 48); and (iii) explore any preliminary evidence of efficacy of the TCQ intervention and the control conditions on alleviating physical and psychological symptoms.
Participants will be recruited from a federally qualified health center in Miami, Florida.
Adaptation of the TCQ intervention, the first aim, will be done through qualitative research.
An expert panel discussion, key informant interviews, and three focus groups will be conducted, and analyzed by thematically based content analysis.
To address aims 2 and 3, the investigators will conduct a pilot study; participants will be randomized to one of 3 conditions: the TCQ intervention, a sham qigong condition, and a standard of care condition.
This is a pilot study to assess feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy, therefore, analyses will be primarily descriptive.
The investigators will assess feasibility and acceptability through questionnaires and adherence to TCQ.
The investigators will assess preliminary evidence of efficacy by looking at instruments that measure depression, anxiety, social support, as well as clinical outcomes.
These will be described through proportions, means, and changes over time through graphing techniques.
Outcomes will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and at three months follow up.
The investigators will conduct preliminary models that will provide information on estimating effect size and power needed for a larger clinical trial.
Note: Due to the coronavirus pandemic, this intervention was adapted from an in-person intervention to a virtual intervention.
The intervention is exactly the same except for the difference in delivery method.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
48
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33137
- Borinquen Medical Centers of Miami Dade
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 50 year or older;
- HIV+,
- able to provide consent;
- must have reliable internet access; and
- willing to participate for the length of the intervention.
Exclusion criteria.
- Participants who are unable to stand for 10-minute segments (i.e., wheelchair or walker bound); and
- participants who have substantial (regular weekly practice for more than 3 months in the past 12 months) experience with mind-body interventions will be excluded because the control group may be contaminated by prior experience.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Qigong Intervention
The qigong intervention consists of 1 hour/week qigong classes for 12 weeks to be delivered virtually.
The first 2 weeks will include 2 hours/week classes.
In addition, each participant will be instructed to practice qigong at home for 90 minutes.
|
Qigong is a low-impact, slow-movement, meditative form of exercise that has helped relieve mental and physical stressors.
|
Sham Comparator: Sham Qigong
This group will also have 1 hour/weekly class delivered virtually that includes movements that are similar to qigong but will not include the meditation or breathwork that will be included in the actual qigong intervention arm.
|
This intervention includes similar body movements to qigong; however, it does not have the meditative or breath work.
|
No Intervention: Treatment-as-usual
This group will receive no classes.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Acceptability: Satisfaction With Weekly Intervention Sessions
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at Week 1 to Week 12 (i.e., once a week for 12 weeks). All weekly scores were averaged across weeks. The number of participants with an average score of 4.00 or higher found the intervention acceptable and is reported below
|
Satisfaction were measured by asking the following questions after each session: "I really enjoyed today's class"; "Today's class met my expectations"; "The instructor was engaged in today's class".
Responses are on a 5 point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) with lower scores meaning less satisfaction.
Both the qigong intervention and the sham qigong control group will be asked these satisfaction items.
Acceptability was defined as responding either agree (4) or strongly agree (5) to each of these items.
Therefore, participants who had an average score of at least 4.00 across all 12 weekly groups was considered a participant that found the intervention acceptable.
The number of participants who found the intervention is counted below.
|
Assessments were conducted at Week 1 to Week 12 (i.e., once a week for 12 weeks). All weekly scores were averaged across weeks. The number of participants with an average score of 4.00 or higher found the intervention acceptable and is reported below
|
Acceptability: Are Participants Doing Home Practice Sessions at 2 Week Post Intervention
Time Frame: Assessment was conducted 2 week post intervention (Week 14)
|
Acceptability was measured by asking the following question at 2 weeks post intervention (Week 14): Did you practice at home this week?
Response format is yes=1, no=0 .
This outcome determines if the participants continued their home practice of Qigong 2 weeks after the end of the intervention.
The number of participants who responded yes were summed and reported below.
The intervention was deemed acceptable to participants if at least 80% of participants were still practicing at home at Week 14.
|
Assessment was conducted 2 week post intervention (Week 14)
|
Acceptability: Session Attendance (Reported as Percentages)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted at Week 1 up to Week 12 (i.e., once a week after each session).
|
The investigators collected attendance after each weekly session (Week 1 to Week 12).
An average attendance across all weekly sessions was calculated by taking the number of groups attended divided by the number of total sessions possible.
The intervention was deemed acceptable if participants attended at least 70% of the weekly groups.
The number of participants who attended 70% of the weekly groups were summed and reported below.
|
Assessments were conducted at Week 1 up to Week 12 (i.e., once a week after each session).
|
Frequency of Home Practice Sessions at 2 Weeks Post Intervention (Week 14)
Time Frame: Assessments were conducted once at 2 week post intervention (Week 14).
|
The investigators collected information on how often participants practiced at home at two weeks post intervention (Week 14).
At Week 14, participants were asked 'If you are practicing at home, how often did you practice the movements?'
Response format is: 1=very frequent (every day), 2=frequent (a few times a week), 3=infrequent (once a week), and 4=very infrequent (less than once a week).
Scores were averaged with the acceptability benchmark being that participants who practiced very frequently (1) or frequently (2) found the intervention acceptable.
That is, participants whose average score was 2.00 or less considered the intervention acceptable.
The number of participants who found the intervention acceptable were summed and reported below.
|
Assessments were conducted once at 2 week post intervention (Week 14).
|
Acceptability: Frequency of Home Practice Sessions at Week 24 (3 Months Post Intervention)
Time Frame: Outcome was measured at Week 24 (i.e., 3 month post intervention)
|
The investigators collected information on how frequently the participants were practicing the intervention at home at Week 24.
Participants were asked the following: "If practicing at home in the last 3 months, how often have you practiced the movements?"
Responses were 1=very frequently (every day), 2= frequently (a few times a week), 3=infrequently (once a week), or 4=very infrequently (less than once a week).
Acceptability was determined if at least 70% of the participants reported very frequently (1) or frequently (2) home practice at Week 24.
Participants with scores of 2.00 or less on this item were summed and then divided by the number of participants who reported any home practice in the last 3 months and also completed an assessment at Week 24.
|
Outcome was measured at Week 24 (i.e., 3 month post intervention)
|
Acceptability: Home Practice of the Intervention at Week 24 (3 Months Post Intervention)
Time Frame: Outcome was measured at Week 24 (3 month post intervention).
|
The investigators collected information on home practice sessions at Week 24 (the 3 month follow up assessment.
Participants were asked the following: "have you practiced any of the movements in the last 3 months?"
Response format was No=0, Yes=1.
The acceptability benchmark was set at 70%.
If at least 70% of participants reported any home practice at 3 months (Week 24) post intervention, the intervention would be deemed acceptable.
The number of participants were summed and then divided by the number of participants assigned to the participant's study group assignment and who completed an assessment at week 24 in order to calculate a percentage.
|
Outcome was measured at Week 24 (3 month post intervention).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Mental Health at 2 Weeks Post Intervention
Time Frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention
|
Mental Health will be assessed using the following standardized scale: the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scale (Ng, et al.; DASS-21 items).
The DASS responses range from 0-3.
The total score ranges from 0-42, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms
|
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention
|
Change in Mental Health at 3 Months Post Intervention
Time Frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months post intervention
|
Mental Health will be assessed using the following standardized scale: the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scale (Ng, et al.; DASS-21 items).
The DASS responses range from 0-3.
The total score ranges from 0-42, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms
|
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months post intervention
|
Change in Physical Health Status as Measured by The Revised Sign & Symptom Check-List for HIV (Holzemer, et al.; 45 Items) at 2 Weeks Post Intervention
Time Frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention
|
Physical Health will be assessed using the following standardized scale: The Revised Sign & Symptom Check-List for HIV (Holzemer, et al.; 45 items).
The Symptoms Checklist total scores range from 0-135, with greater scores reflecting more symptoms.
|
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention
|
Change in Physical Health Status as Measured by The Revised Sign & Symptom Check-List for HIV (Holzemer, et al.; 45 Items) at 3 Months Post Intervention
Time Frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months post intervention
|
Physical Health will be assessed using the following standardized scale: The Revised Sign & Symptom Check-List for HIV (Holzemer, et al.; 45 items).
The Symptoms Checklist total scores range from 0-135, with greater scores reflecting more symptoms.
|
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months post intervention
|
Change in Physical Health Status as Measured by The HIV-related Fatigue Scale (Belza, et al.,16 Items) at 2 Weeks Post Intervention
Time Frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention
|
Physical Health will be assessed using the following standardized scale: The HIV-related Fatigue Scale (Belza, et al.,16 items) .
The total score for the Fatigue Scale ranges from 0-50, with greater scores reflecting more fatigue.
|
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 2 weeks post intervention
|
Change in Physical Health Status as Measured by The HIV-related Fatigue Scale (Belza, et al.,16 Items) at 3 Months Post Intervention
Time Frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months post intervention
|
Physical Health will be assessed using the following standardized scale: The HIV-related Fatigue Scale (Belza, et al.,16 items) .
The total score for the Fatigue Scale ranges from 0-50, with greater scores reflecting more fatigue.
|
Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 3 months post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 6, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
September 30, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 11, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
February 15, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 4, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 8, 2024
Last Verified
March 1, 2024
More Information
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mental Health
-
Chinese University of Hong KongNot yet recruitingMental Health Wellness 1 | Mental Well-being | Mental Health Issue | Precision Mental HealthHong Kong
-
King's College LondonCompletedMental Health Wellness 1 | Mental Health IssueUnited Kingdom
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentCompletedMental Health | Veterans Health | Rural HealthUnited States
-
Chapin Hall at the University of ChicagoUniversity of ConnecticutCompletedMental Health | Physical Health
-
National Taiwan Normal UniversityCompletedMental Health | Physical HealthTaiwan
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityCompletedMental Health DisordersUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedMental Health DisordersCongo
-
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologySt. Olavs HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersNorway
-
University of WarwickKing's College London; KU Leuven; University Hospital, Montpellier; Erasmus Medical... and other collaboratorsUnknownMental Health Disorder | Mental Health ImpairmentIreland, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, Croatia, France, Italy
-
York UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); North York General HospitalCompletedMental Health DisordersCanada
Clinical Trials on The Qigong Intervention
-
Lund UniversityThe Swedish Institute for Health Sciences; Ekhaga foundation; Greta and Johan...CompletedLumbar Disc Herniation | Lumbago | Chronic Low Back Pain | Lumbar Spinal Stenosis | Lumbar Spondylolisthesis | Lumbar Disc Degeneration | Chronic Sciatica | Persistent Postoperative PainSweden
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRecruitingCOVID-19 InfectionHong Kong
-
Tri-Service General HospitalCompletedCognitive Dysfunction | Exercise Training | Cognitive Decline | Cognitive Aging | Grip | Physical Endurance
-
Ching-I ChangTaipei Hospital, TaiwanCompletedQuality of Life | Breast Cancer | Intraoperative AwarenessTaiwan
-
Akdeniz UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Postoperative Pain | Muscle Weakness | Pain, Shoulder | Respiratory Function Loss | Joint AdhesionTurkey
-
Nova Scotia Health AuthorityCompletedChronic Pain
-
Radboud University Medical CenterUniversitas TarumanagaraCompletedDepressive Symptoms | Well-beingIndonesia
-
University of MinnesotaRecruitingSpinal Cord InjuriesUnited States
-
University of California, DavisActive, not recruiting
-
University of HoustonBrigham and Women's Hospital; Texas Woman's UniversityActive, not recruitingQuality of Life | Physical Function | Caregiver DistressUnited States