Metal Versus Plastic Stent in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

April 3, 2019 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital

Comparison of Metal Versus Plastic Side-by-side Stent Insertion in Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

The purpose of this study was to compare the difference in the stent patency duration between side-by-side fully covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) and side-by-side plastic stents in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the case of distal common bile duct obstruction, the SEMS was reported to be clinically superior to the plastic stent in previous studies. However, there are few studies comparing the two methods in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction. In contrast to the distal common bile duct obstruction, the advantage of plastic stents over SEMSs exists, and plastic stents are used commonly in real clinical practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Woo Hyun Paik, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 82-2-2072-2228
  • Email: whpaik@snuh.org

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 03080
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Woo Hyun Paik, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: 82-2-2072-2228
          • Email: whpaik@snuh.org

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unresectable malignant hilar biliary stricture requiring biliary drainage through endoscopic procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If endoscopy is not possible based on the judgement of the researcher
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months
  • Acute cholecystitis
  • Previous history of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage
  • Previous history of metal stent placement for malignant biliary stricture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FCSEMS
In patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction, endoscopic drainage is performed for biliary drainage. Since intrahepatic bile ducts are separated, it is preferable to insert a stent into bilateral intrahepatic bile ducts for bile drainage if possible. In FCSEMS group, patients are inserted with Fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) bilaterally for malignant hilar biliary stricture via endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.
In patients who were identified to have malignant hilar biliary obstruction, bilateral stents insertion is attempted via ERCP. There will be two groups divided by stent material; FCSEMS and Plastic stent.
Other Names:
  • Plastic stent
  • FCSEMS
Active Comparator: Plastic stent
In patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction, endoscopic drainage is performed for biliary drainage. Since intrahepatic bile ducts are separated, it is preferable to insert a stent into bilateral intrahepatic bile ducts for bile drainage if possible. In plastic stent group, patients are inserted with plastic stents bilaterally for malignant hilar biliary stricture.
In patients who were identified to have malignant hilar biliary obstruction, bilateral stents insertion is attempted via ERCP. There will be two groups divided by stent material; FCSEMS and Plastic stent.
Other Names:
  • Plastic stent
  • FCSEMS

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of stent patency
Time Frame: 9 months after randomization.
The period from the insertion of the stent to the point at which stent revision is required.
9 months after randomization.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Seoul National University Hospital Seoul National University Hospital, MD, PhD, Seoul National University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 3, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1812-098-996

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malignant Hepatobiliary Neoplasm

Clinical Trials on endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography

3
Subscribe