A Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Fillers (05DF1707)

August 24, 2022 updated by: Galderma R&D

A Multi-center, Evaluator-blinded Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of HA Fillers for Lifting, Contouring and Correcting Volume Deficiency of the Midface Using an Individualized Treatment Algorithm

The purpose of the study is to investigate the degree of improvement in appearance after treatment with different hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. Product selection is based on Investigator assessment of participant tissue coverage and main treatment goal (volumizing, lifting or contouring).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Munich, Germany, 80636
        • Galderma Research Site
      • Palermo, Italy, 90141
        • Galderma Research Site
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom, EH10 4BE
        • Galderma Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male/Female 25 to 55 years old that needs lifting, contouring or volumization of the midface
  • Signed and dated informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known/previous allergy or hypersensitivity to any injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) gel and lidocain
  • Previous use of any permanent or semi-permanent facial tissue augmentation therapy or contouring with, lifting threads, permanent implants, or autologous fat in the treatment area
  • Previous use of any HA or collagen based facial tissue augmentation therapy in the facial area, any previous use of neurotoxin or any previous facial surgery
  • Any medical condition that in the opinion of the Investigator would make the participant unsuitable for inclusion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Restylane Volyme
According to the treatment algorithm, treated with Restylane Volyme
Hyaluronic based filler
EXPERIMENTAL: Restylane Defyne
According to the treatment algorithm, treated with Restylane Defyne
Hyaluronic based filler
EXPERIMENTAL: Restylane Lyft Lidocaine
According to the treatment algorithm, treated with Restylane Lyft Lidocaine
Hyaluronic based filler

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Aesthetic Improvement of Midface
Time Frame: 8 weeks
A blinded evaluator assesses the improvement compared to baseline (pre-treatment) using a 5-graded scale; Worse, No change, Improved, Much improved or Very much improved. Aesthetic improvement of midface is defined as those participants assessed as Improved, Much improved or Very much improved.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Improved Midface Volume
Time Frame: 8 weeks

A blinded evaluator assessed the fullness of the midface by using a 4-graded scale where 1= fairly full and 4= substantial loss of fullness.

Improved midface volume was defined as at least a 1-grade decrease from baseline.

8 weeks
Percentage of Participants Assessed as Having Natural Treatment Results
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Blinded evaluator assessed participants by answering Strongly agree/Agree/Neither agree nor disagree/Disagree/Strongly disagree to the question "Are the subject's treatment results natural looking?". Having natural treatment results is defined as being assessed with answers Strongly agree or Agree.
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 30, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Volume Deficiency of the Midface

Clinical Trials on Restylane Volyme

3
Subscribe