Tailored Home-Based Exercise Program for Multiple Chronic Conditions (iHBE)

Assessment of a Tailored Home-Based Exercise Program on Symptoms, Well-Being, and Resilience Among Cancer Survivors With Multiple Chronic Conditions

A home-based, tailored, technology-enhanced home-based exercise program (iHBE) using a combination of the integrated mobile technologies (wearable device and phone application) and tailored home-based exercise will be pilot tested. Participants will choose one of the four home-based exercise options [National Institute of Aging (NIA) Go4Life (an exercise and physical activity campaign from the NIA), Iyengar-style yoga, walking, and modified Otago exercise] based on participants' preference and goals. The integrated mobile technologies system will allow the investigators to extract heart rate data directly from the wearable device to the research server. This data will be used to provide appropriate and personalized feedback on physical performance. The survey and notification to the participants on the smartphone.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The benefits of physical activity on managing chronic illnesses and multiple symptoms are well established. However, increasing the physical activity of persons living with Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC), especially low -income cancer survivors with MCC, is challenging. Home-based exercise improves physical activity and symptoms among persons with the single chronic disease. One major challenge of the home-based exercise is the motivation and adherence. The mobile technologies (e.g., wearable device and smartphone application) have been used to improve motivation and monitor a person physical activity. Guided by the society to cells framework and previous preliminary findings, the investigators developed a technology-enhanced home-based exercise program using a combination of the integrated mobile technologies (wearable device and phone application) and tailored home-based exercise. Participants will choose one of the four home-based exercise options [National Institute of Aging (NIA) Go4Life, Iyengar-style yoga, walking, and modified Otago exercise] based on participants' preference and goals. The integrated mobile technologies system will allow the investigators to extract heart rate data directly from the wearable device to the research server. This data will be used to provide appropriate and personalized feedback on physical performance and trigger algorithms to send the survey and notification to the participants in real time. This pilot project will examine the feasibility of this technology-enhanced home exercise tailored to participants' goals and preferences. The intervention will leverage the cancer survivorship phase (post-treatment) to motivate self-care by combining tailored existing evidence-based physical activity programs and mobile technology for participants to engage in the resilience-enhancing physical activity. Identification of BDNF's role as one of the exercise outcomes provide a novel target for an intervention and increase the investigators' understanding of the underlying mechanism of symptoms and resilience. This study aims to examine the feasibility and acceptability of the iHBE program among low-income cancer survivors living with co-morbid conditions. Eight participants who have completed treatment for a solid tumor cancer with at least one comorbidity (e.g., diabetes and/or hypertension) will be assigned to an open-label trial of the idea. The investigators will gather feedback on goal setting, problem-solving strategies, exercise choices, and tracking mechanisms, program feasibility, and acceptability and modify the intervention as needed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • participants diagnosed with solid tumor cancer who have completed cancer treatment at least 6 months;
  • diagnosed with diabetes and/or hypertension for at least a year;
  • aged 21 years or older,
  • have an annual household incomes of below $50,000 for families of three,
  • the average fatigue level within the past 7 days at the level of 3 or more on the 0 (no fatigue) to 10 (worse fatigue) Likert scale
  • give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently undergoing treatment for cancer;
  • have an active infection (e.g., fever, localized redness, swelling, sinus congestion);
  • diagnosed with a psychological disorder (e.g., suicidal or homicidal tendencies, extreme anxiety or depression)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The iHBE program group
Tailored Technology-Enhance Home-based exercise program (iHBE)
The tailored technology enhanced home-based exercise (iHBE) program is a 12-week program with 1 assessment home visit session, 5 home visits and 7 phone follow ups during exercise. The technologies, a wearable device, and a smartphone application, will be used as a tool to monitor physical performance (heart rate [HR], step count), provide immediate feedback, send daily reminding message through Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment (mEMA). The coded raw data without personal identification information from the wearable device will be sent to the servers where the investigators can store it in the database alongside the mEMA data and create custom reports showing Heart Rate (HR) 30 minute before each Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) survey, showing HR and previous self-report responses before/ after each automatically triggered EMA.
Other Names:
  • iHBE
No Intervention: Usual Care (Control group)
Participants were required to wear physical activity tracker (Fitbit) and respond to the daily symptoms survey (mEMA) while receiving usual care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fatigue as Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 6a
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Fatigue was assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0-Fatigue 6a. This 6-item measure covers fatigue frequency, duration, intensity, and impact on daily activities. Responses were summed to generate a raw score (range 6-30), which was converted to a standardized T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10) based on the U.S. general population. Higher T-scores indicate greater fatigue (worse outcome). The reported outcome is the change in PROMIS Fatigue T-score from baseline to completion, where negative values indicate improvement.
Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Change in Resilience as Assessed by Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Resilience was assessed using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC; 10 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = not true at all to 4 = true nearly all the time). Raw scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater resilience (better outcome). The reported outcome is the mean change in raw score, calculated as the score at the completion time point (12 weeks) minus the score at baseline. Positive values indicate improvement in resilience.
Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Change in Physical Well Being
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Physical well-being was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The measure was derived from the physical functioning, role-physical, and bodily pain domains. Each domain is scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health. The reported outcome is the mean change in the averaged domain scores from baseline to completion. Positive values indicate improvement in physical well-being.
Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Change in Mental Well Being
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Mental well-being was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The Mental Component Score was calculated as the average of relevant domains (vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional health, and mental health). Each domain is scored from 0 to 100, and the average domain score was used to represent overall mental well-being. Higher scores indicate better mental health. The reported outcome is the mean change in the averaged raw score from baseline to completion. Positive values indicate an improvement in mental well-being.
Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical Activity
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The physical activity will be measured in a form of average step count/day measured by a wrist-worn wearable device.
12 weeks
Change in Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Level (in Serum)
Time Frame: Pre-and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
The level of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in serum was measured by ELISA. The level will be measured in nanograms/milliliter.
Pre-and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Change in Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Level (in Sweat)
Time Frame: Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks
Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor level in sweat collected through the sweat pad. The level will be measured in nanograms/milliliter.
Pre- and post-intervention, up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nada Lukkahatai, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Nursing

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypertension

Clinical Trials on Tailored Technology-Enhance Home-based exercise program (iHBE)

Subscribe