a Prospective Trial Comparing Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

September 25, 2021 updated by: Lukas Oberhammer, Salzburger Landeskliniken

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomised, Single-blind Trial Comparing Two Surgical Techniques

In this trial the investigators want to examine and compare oncological and surgical outcomes of two surgical techniques in a prospective, randomised, single-blind trial. Therefore the investigators are going to include 30 patients with a renal mass who need surgical treatment. When they fulfill the inclusion criteria they get randomised either for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy or laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Primary endpoint is the oncological outcome (residual tumor classification, TNM classification), secondary endpoints are operation time, time of ischemia, blood loss, pain after surgery, kidney function, complications and hospital stay.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients taking part in the study are first given a R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score. Based on that score they are allocate to either of :

cohort I (low complexity of the tumour) or cohort II (intermediate complexity of the tumour).

Thereafter, the patient will be randomly placed into either to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy or robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. Both these surgical techniques are well established and standardized procedures to remove a renal mass.

Preoperatively, the preparation is nearly the same for both techniques. The patient is positioned in flank position with the affected side up.

Thereafter:

Pneumoperitoneum is achieved with a Veress needle and trocars which are placed under direct vision. The only difference between the two techniques is the number of trocars, performing the laparoscopic partial nephrectomy three or four ports are used, performing the robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy five ports are used.

Intraabdominal, the kidney is exposed by incising along the Toldt line to moblize the colon. After exposing the ureter and the gonadal vein dissection is continued proximally toward the renal hilum. Following this, Gerota's fascia is incised to expose the tumour and the surrounding renal capsule. Now the renal artery has to be clamped to avoid bleeding followed by excision of the tumour. The surgery takes about three hours, the complication rate is more the same for both techniques.

Primary endpoint is the resection margin to see if there are any difference between the two surgical techniques.

Information about the resection margin and pathological staging will be given through our pathological department. The histological examination normally takes about five to seven days.

Further parameters are taken by following schema:

Information about age, sex, body mass index, other diseases and medication is documented on the day of inpatient admission.

Blood samples for haemoglobin and kidney function are taken at the day of inpatient admission, four hours after surgery, first day after surgery and the day of discharge from hospital.

The duration of surgery is documented throughout the operative protocol. R.E.N.A.L Nephrometry score is evaluated preoperative, to be able to compare the complexity of surgery.

Renal ischemia is documented throughout the operative protocol. Blood loss is documented during surgery. Pain is documented with the aid of the visual analogue scale (VAS Scale). This will be evaluated four hours after surgery, day one after surgery, day two after surgery and on the day of discharge from hospital.

Complications are documented with the aid of the clavien-dindo classification. Three follow-ups will be performed. The first follow-up will be held two weeks after surgery to discuss the histological result and examine haemoglobin, kidney function and pain. The second follow-up will be held six months after surgery, the third follow-up 12 months after surgery. At this time a re-examination again haemoglobin and kidney function will be performed as well as a computed tomography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Salzburg, Austria, 5020
        • Uniklinikum Salzburg, Department for Urology and Andrology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • minimum age of 18 years
  • solid renal mass suspicious for renal cell carcinoma or at least Bosniak III cyst
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • performed kidney surgery at the same side
  • Pregnancy
  • RENAL Nephrometry score III

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
partial nephrectomy performed with the da Vinci Surgical System
Partial nephrectomy is the standard technique for organ-sparing resection of renal tumors. The EAU Guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy to all patients with T1 tumours and can be performed either with an open, pure laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach, based on surgeon's expertise and skills.
OTHER: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
partial nephrectomy performed with conventional laparoscopic surgery
Partial nephrectomy is the standard technique for organ-sparing resection of renal tumors. The EAU Guidelines recommend partial nephrectomy to all patients with T1 tumours and can be performed either with an open, pure laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach, based on surgeon's expertise and skills.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with R0 status
Time Frame: one year
The tumor status following further treatment is described by the residual tumor classification. R0 means no residual tumor, R1 means microscopic residual tumor. The investigators are going to examine if there are any significant differences concerning tumor status between these two surgical techniques
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operation time
Time Frame: one year
time of surgery (in minutes)
one year
Ischemia time
Time Frame: one year
Time of warm ischemia during laparoscopic or robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
one year
Blood loss
Time Frame: one year
The amount of blood loss during performing partial nephrectomy
one year
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: one year
Postoperative pain is going to be documented with the aid of the visual analogue scale. The visual analogue scale is a validated, subjective measure for pain. With the aid of a scale from zero to ten which represents a continuum between 'no pain' (0) and 'worst pain' (10) the subjective pain of each participant will be evaluated. This will be done four hours after surgery, day one after surgery, day two after surgery and on the day of discharge from hospital.
one year
Kidney function
Time Frame: one year
Before and after surgery blood samples are taken to evaluate the kidney function with the aid of Serum creatinine and the glomerular Filtration rate
one year
Complications
Time Frame: one year
Postoperative complications evaluated by 'clavien-dindo' classification
one year
Hospital stay
Time Frame: one year
The length of hospital stay
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 3, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 15, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 28, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Renal Cell

Clinical Trials on partial nephrectomy

3
Subscribe