Recovery of Performance, Muscle Damage and Neuromuscular Fatigue Following Muscle Power Training (PoTrRec)

December 30, 2020 updated by: Ioannis G. Fatouros, University of Thessaly

Investigation on the Recovery Kinetics of Performance, Muscle Damage and Neuromuscular Fatigue Indicators, Following Different Protocols for Muscle Power Development

Muscle power is one of the most important parameters in almost every athletic action, and expresses the ability of the human muscle to produce great amounts of force with the greatest possible speed. Thus, muscle power is critical for high performance in athletic actions such as jumping, throwing, change of direction and sprinting. For enhancing their muscle power, athletes comprise several resistance training programs as part of their training. Muscle power training comprises of eccentric muscle actions, and the magnitude of these actions depend on the emphasis that is given on the concentric or eccentric action, respectively, of the muscles during the exercises. However, eccentric muscle action, especially when unaccustomed, can lead to exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD), and deterioration of muscle performance.

Despite the fact that muscle power training comprises eccentric muscle actions, and consequently can lead to muscle injury and muscle performance reduction during the following days, the recovery kinetics after acute muscle power training have not been adequately studied. However, information regarding the recovery of the muscles after a power training protocol, is critical for the correct design of a training microcycle, and the reduction of injury risk.

The aim of the present study is to investigate the muscle injury provoked after acute muscle power training using three different power training exercise protocols. Additionally, we will examine the effect of these protocols on muscle performance and neuromuscular fatigue indices.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Muscle power is one of the most important parameters in almost every athletic action, and expresses the ability of the human muscle to produce great amounts of force with the greatest possible speed. Thus, muscle power is critical for high performance in athletic actions such as jumping, throwing, change of direction and sprinting.

For enhancing their muscle power, athletes comprise several resistance training programs as part of their training. Core exercises as long as Olympic lifting has been used in muscle power training. The loads that are applied regarding the accomplishment of the most favorable power production are varying. Training load of 0% 1RM favored power production at the countermovement squat jump, while loads of 56% 1rm and 80% 1RM, favored the power production at squat and hang clean, respectively. Additionally, In the recent years, accentuated eccentric training has been proposed as a new training method for the enhancement of muscle power. This method emphasizes the eccentric component of the muscle contraction, and there is evidence supporting the greater production of muscle force after accentuated eccentric training compared with the typical resistance exercise training method.

Taking the above into consideration, muscle power training comprises of eccentric muscle actions, and the magnitude of the eccentric component depends on the emphasis that is given on the concentric or eccentric action, respectively, of the muscles during the exercises. However, eccentric muscle action, especially when unaccustomed, can lead to exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). Although concentric and isometric exercise may also lead to muscle injury, the amount of damage after eccentric muscle contractions is greater. EIMD, amongst others, is accompanied by increased levels of creatine kinase (CK) into the circulation, increased delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS), reduction of force production, reduction of flexibility speed.

Despite the fact that muscle power training comprises eccentric muscle actions, and consequently can lead to muscle injury and muscle performance reduction during the following days, the recovery kinetics after acute muscle power training protocols have not been adequately studied. However, information regarding the recovery of the muscles after a power training protocol, is critical for the correct design of a training microcycle, and the reduction of injury risk.

The aim of the present study is to investigate the muscle injury provoked after muscle acute power training using three different power training exercise protocols. Additionally, the effect of these protocols on muscle performance and neuromuscular fatigue indices will be examined.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Thessaly
      • Trikala, Thessaly, Greece, 42100
        • Laboratory of Exercise Biochemistry, Exercise Physiology,and Sports Nutrition, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, University of Thessaly

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 33 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • No recent history of musculoskeletal injury
  • No use of ergogenic supplements and drugs
  • No use of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant supplements (> 6 months)
  • No participation at intense eccentric exercise for at least 3 days before protocols

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recent history of musculoskeletal injury
  • Use of ergogenic supplements and drugs
  • Use of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant supplements (< 6 months)
  • Participation at intense eccentric exercise for at least 3 days before protocols

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Core exercises protocol
Participants will perform 4 core exercises

Participants will perform:

  1. Squats, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
  2. Deadlifts, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
  3. Lunges, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
  4. Step ups, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
Experimental: Structural exercises protocol
Participants will perform 4 structural (Olympic lifting) exercises

Participants will perform:

  1. Snatch, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
  2. Hang clean, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
  3. Push jerk, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
  4. Split push jerk, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% 1RM
Experimental: Accentuated eccentric load exercises protocol
Participants will perform 4 exercises with eccentric loading

Participants will perform:

  1. Deadlifts - squat jump, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 30% body mass (BM)
  2. Step down - squat jump, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 30% BM
  3. Step down - lunges, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 30% BM
  4. Hip thrusts, 4 sets of 5 repetitions at 30% BM
Other: Control condition
Participants will perform all the measurements that are comprised in the experimental conditions without performing any exercise protocol
Participants will perform all the measurements that are comprised in the experimental conditions without performing any exercise protocol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change on delayed onset of muscle soreness (DOMS), in the knee flexors (KF) and extensors (KE) of both limbs
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Participants will perform three repetitions of a full squat movement, and rate their soreness level in knee flexors and extensors on a visual analog scale from 1 to 10 (VAS, with "no pain" at one end and "extremely sore" at the other), using palpation of the belly and the distal region of relaxed knee extensors and flexors.
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on countermovement jump (CMJ) height
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
CMJ height will be measured in 3 maximal efforts (the best jump will be recorded) on an Ergojump contact platform
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on isometric peak torque of the knee extensors (KE)
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Isometric peak torque of the KE will be measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60◦/sec
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on isometric peak torque of the knee flexors (KF)
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Isometric peak torque of the KF will be measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60◦/sec
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on concentric isokinetic peak torque of the knee extensors (KE)
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Concentric peak torque of the KE will be measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60◦/sec
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on concentric isokinetic peak torque of the knee flexors (KF)
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Concentric peak torque of the KF will be measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60◦/sec
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change one eccentric isokinetic peak torque of the knee extensors (KE)
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Eccentric peak torque of the KE will be measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60◦/sec
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on eccentric isokinetic peak torque of the knee flexors (KF)
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Eccentric peak torque of the KF will be measured on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60◦/sec
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on the concentration of plasma CK activity
Time Frame: Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Plasma CK activity will be measured with a biochemical analyzer
Prior to, immediately after, 1, 2, 3 days after the end of the experimental protocol
Change on the concentration of blood lactate
Time Frame: Prior to, and immediately after the end of the experimental protocol
Lactate will be measured with a portable lactate analyzer using capillary blood
Prior to, and immediately after the end of the experimental protocol

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ioannis G Fatouros, PhD, University of Thessaly

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 6, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 30, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Power Training-Recovery UTH

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Power Training Exercise Protocols

Clinical Trials on Core exercises protocol

3
Subscribe