Sustainability of a Research Program in Risk Management (PeRENNITe) (SUSTAIN)

November 8, 2021 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Sustainability of a Research Program in Risk Management: Routine Implementation, Appropriation, Effectiveness, Development of the Safety Culture

Sustainability can be defined by several dimensions: the pursuit of program elements, the maintenance of its effectiveness, its integration into work processes, the adaptation of the program to the local context, its integration into the organizational culture, the dissemination of the program to other centres. Studies show that the continuation of the entire intervention is rare once the research stops.

The PRisM study (Pluriprofessionality and Risk Management through a Multifaceted Program in Primary Care) was a primary care risk management (RM) research project. Its purpose was to develop a safety culture within the participating multi-professional primary care structures. From 2015 to 2017, multi-professional primary care offices participated in the study, half of which implemented a RM program consisting of: 1) Training on RM in the context of primary care; 2) The appointment of a RM referent; 3) The conduct of six meetings of systematic analysis of incidents.

The PRisM study represents a favorable ground for the development of a methodology for evaluating the sustainability of a RM program in primary care.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Pôle de Santé publique des HCL
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pauline OCCELLI, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pluriprofessional primary care offices in France (called "centre, pôle et maison de santé pluridisciplinaire")

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Volontary pluriprofessional primary care offices
  • Having participated in the PRiSM study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • office that waived participation in the PRisM study course
  • office with a participation rate in the first PRisM safety climate survey < 30%.
  • office of the PRisM study intervention group that did not implement the program as planned

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PRisM program

Pluriprofessional primary care offices with the PRiSM RM program:

  • Nine of the pluriprofessional primary care offices which implemented the RM program tested in the PRiSM study (2015-2017). The program consisted in: 1) Training on RM in the context of primary care; 2) The appointment of a RM referent in the office; 3) The conduct of six incident review meetings.
  • All participating offices had to declare adverse events that occurred during the time frame of the PRiSM study.
  • All participating offices had to fill in the safety climate survey MOSPS at the beginning and at the end of the PRiSM study.

No intervention will be implemented in the present study.

The investigators will evaluate of the sustainability of a research program in risk management in pluriprofessional primary care offices:

  • Qualitatively assessed safety culture and Sustainability of the PRisM RM program in the offices by interviews of professional belonging to the offices.
  • Quantitatively assessed safety climate in the offices measured by the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPS) Questionnaire (fill in by the professionals of the offices)
Control

Pluriprofessional primary care offices without the PRiSM RM program:

  • Nine of the offices pluriprofessional primary care offices which didn't implement the RM program tested in the PRiSM study (2015-2017). They belonged to the PRisM study control group.
  • All participating offices had to declare adverse events that occurred during the time frame of the PRiSM study.
  • All participating offices had to fill in the safety climate survey MOSPS at the beginning and at the end of the PRiSM study.

No intervention will be implemented in the present study.

The investigators will evaluate of the sustainability of a research program in risk management in pluriprofessional primary care offices:

  • Qualitatively assessed safety culture and Sustainability of the PRisM RM program in the offices by interviews of professional belonging to the offices.
  • Quantitatively assessed safety climate in the offices measured by the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPS) Questionnaire (fill in by the professionals of the offices)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient safety culture
Time Frame: 24 months from the end of the PRiSM study in 2017 (2019)
- Qualitatively assessed through the model developed for health by Reiman, which apprehends the safety culture through organizational dimensions, social processes and psychological dimensions
24 months from the end of the PRiSM study in 2017 (2019)
patient safety culture
Time Frame: 24 months from the end of the PRiSM study in 2017 (2019)
- Quantitatively assessed through 13 safetyclimate dimensions measured by the Medical Office Survey on Patient Safety Culture (MOSPS) Questionnaire
24 months from the end of the PRiSM study in 2017 (2019)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Pauline OCCELLI, MD, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 69HCL19_0043

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on RM Program

Clinical Trials on Sustainability of a research program in risk management

3
Subscribe