The Effect of Two Different Dual Task Balance Trainings in Older Adults

June 11, 2021 updated by: Marmara University

The Effect of Two Different Dual Task Balance Trainings on Balance and Gait in Older Adults

The aim of our study is to investigate the effect of integrated and consecutive dual-task exercise trainings in elderly people on the balance, fear of falling and gait performance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

For the purpose, the number of 42 participants reached by the power analysis method was determined as 60 people considering the possible separations. 60 participants will be included in the study. Participants should not have any orthopedic, neurological and cognitive disabilities and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) scale score should be 21 or higher. Participants will be divided into two groups as random consecutive and integrated dual activity groups.

In the study sit-up, stand on one leg (eye open-closed), standing 30 sec stop (eye open closed stop), 10 m walk backward, sitting on top of the ball (eye open-closed), transfer of weight on the top-left, walking in straight line, 30 sec. stop on soft ground (eye open-close), balance training which does not force their efforts will be given in two groups.

For the sequential dual activity group, immediately after these trainings, you should expected to find the letters Z in the mixed letters, search for the five words you read on the previous page, find the similarities between the concepts, find the letter in the given tables, derive the fruit names starting with the letter, count the days of the week etc. Attention, memory and arithmetic training will be given the ability to run. For the integrated dual activity group will be given similar cognitive tasks during simple balance training.

The training program will be prolonged 8 weeks and 2 days per week for both groups.

The assessment tests was performed before and after the program. Primer Outcome Measure: Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up and Go Test (Standart-Cognitive), 10m Walking Speed Test (under single and dual task conditions).

Although there are many studies to increase and measure the balance and physical capacity of elderly people in the literature, there is no study using consecutive exercises and comparing the benefits of consecutive and integrated cognitive dual task training.

A major cause of morbidity and mortality is a fall injury in the elderly. Therefore, preventing falls in elderly people and increasing the ability to balance is an important public health priority.

Our study aims to benefit the public health, the reduction of health expenses of our country, the physiotherapists working with elderly people and the literature.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maltepe
      • Istanbul, Maltepe, Turkey, 34848
        • Darüşşafaka Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

63 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Accepts to start routine exercise programs under the supervision of the medical team,
  • Over age 65,
  • Does not have orthopedic problems that may prevent him from exercising,
  • The MOCA score is 21 or higher,
  • Participants who have no other neurological problems that may cause loss of balance will be taken.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having orthopedic problems that prevent him from exercising,
  • Being under the MOCA score 21,
  • To have any neurological problem that will affect the balance,
  • Not wanting to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Consecutive Dual Task Training
Sit-up, stand on one leg (eye open-closed), standing 30 sec stop (eye open closed stop), 10 m walk backward, sitting on top of the ball (eye open-closed), transfer of weight on the top-left, walking in straight line, 30 sec. stop on soft ground (eye open-close), balance training which does not force their efforts will be given to the group. Immediately after these trainings, they should expected to find the letters Z in the mixed letters, search for the five words you read on the previous page, find the similarities between the concepts, find the letter in the given tables, derive the fruit names starting with the letter, count the days of the week etc. Attention, memory and arithmetic training will be given the ability to run.
8 weeks and 2 days per week, one session 45 min. Consecutive dual task creates the idea that it may provide more workable work without creating stress while doing secondary task during dual task.
Active Comparator: Integrated Dual Task Training
Sit-up, stand on one leg (eye open-closed), standing 30 sec stop (eye open closed stop), 10 m walk backward, sitting on top of the ball (eye open-closed), transfer of weight on the top-left, walking in straight line, 30 sec. stop on soft ground (eye open-close), balance training which does not force their efforts will be given to the group. They will be done similar cognitive activities during with this simple balance trainings.
8 weeks and 2 days per week, one session 45 min. Integrated dual task is a proven mode of work that has positive effects on geriatrics

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: 15 minutes

The Berg Balance Scale (or BBS) is a widely used clinical test of a person's static and dynamic balance abilities, named after Katherine Berg, one of the developers. For functional balance tests, the BBS is generally considered to be the gold standard.

The test takes 15-20 minutes and comprises a set of 14 simple balance related tasks, ranging from standing up from a sitting position, to standing on one foot. The degree of success in achieving each task is given a score of zero (unable) to four (independent), and the final measure is the sum of all of the scores.

Minimum score is 0 while maximum score is 56. The classification; 0-20 scores - wheelchair user, 21-44 scores - walking with assistance 45-56 scores - independent.

The test was performed at baseline and after Intervention (8 weeks)

15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go test (TUGST)
Time Frame: 5 minutes

The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. Description of the Instrument. Patients are timed (in seconds) when performing the TUG-3 conditions 1. TUG alone-from sitting in a chair, stand up, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down.. 2. TUG Cognitive-complete the task while counting backwards from a randomly selected number between 20 and 100.

The test was performed at baseline and after Intervention (8 weeks)

5 minutes
Timed Up and Go test Cognitive (TUGCOG)
Time Frame: 5 minutes

The Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is a simple test used to assess a person's mobility and requires both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. Description of the Instrument. Patients are timed (in seconds) when performing the TUG-3 conditions 1. TUG alone-from sitting in a chair, stand up, walk 3 meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down.. 2. TUG Cognitive-complete the task while counting backwards from a randomly selected number between 20 and 100.

When a cognitive task is added while performing the test, it is called Timed Up and Go Cognitive.

The test was performed at baseline and after Intervention (8 weeks)

5 minutes
10 Meters Walking Test Under Dual Task Condition (10MWTDT)
Time Frame: 5 minutes

The standard 10 m walking test is performed while performing a second activity simultaneously. There are many additional task suggestions that can be given during the walk. One of these suggestions is the "counting backwards" task as a cognitive task.

The test was performed at baseline and after Intervention (8 weeks)

5 minutes
10 Meters Walking Test Under Single Task Condition (10MWTST)
Time Frame: 5 minutes

Measures the time required to walk 10 meters. Administration time is usually less than 5 minutes. Performed using a "flying start": the patient walks 14 meters and the time is measured for the intermediate 10 meters. The individual walks at their preferred walking speed. It is aimed to measure walking speed.

The test was performed at baseline and after Intervention (8 weeks)

5 minutes
Tinetti Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Time Frame: 5 minutes

A 10-item questionnaire designed confidence in their ability to perform 10 daily tasks without falling as an indicator of how one's fear of falling impacts physical performance. Each item is rated from 1 ("very confident") to 10 ("not confident at all"), and the per item ratings are added to generate a summary.

The test was performed at baseline and after Intervention (8 weeks)

5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Volkan Yüzlü, PT MSc, Darüşşafaka Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Center
  • Study Director: Semra Oğuz, PhD, Marmara University
  • Study Chair: Mine Gülden Polat, Prof PhD, Marmara University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 09.2019.181

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dual Task Exercises in Elderly People

Clinical Trials on Consecutive dual task

3
Subscribe