Endoscopic Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor(NET) Less Than 10mm

Cap Endoscopic Mucosal Resection(EMR-C) Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection(ESD) for Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor(NET) Less Than 10mm

Cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR-C) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have both been reported to be effective treatment methods for small rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in limited studies. Which one is better has not been determined. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of EMR-C and ESD for the treatment of small rectal NET.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age from 18 to 75 years;
  • Definite diagnosis of rectal NET less than 10mm;
  • Patients plan to receive either EMR-C or ESD treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Serious comorbid diseases such as advanced malignant tumor and organ failure;
  • Patients received conventional EMR, snare electrotomy and no treatment;
  • Rectal NET with metastasis;
  • Pregnant patient;
  • Poor compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ESD group
In ESD group, enrolled patients will receive the treatment modality of ESD to remove the rectal NET
ESD were all performed as the standard procedure that has been widely described and used. A diluted sodium hyaluronate solution was injected submucosally. Mucosal incision and submucosal dissection were performed by using either Hook knife (Olympus Medical, Japan) or a dual-knife (Olympus Medical, Japan) . After the resection was finished, all of the visible vessels on the artificial ulcer bed were thoroughly coagulated with argon plasma coagulation to prevent postoperative bleeding.
EXPERIMENTAL: EMR-C group
In EMR-C group, enrolled patients will receive the treatment modality of EMR-C to remove the rectal NET
A transparent cap (MH-593; Olympus) was attached to the forward-viewing endoscope. After the endoscope was inserted to the rectum, the snare passed through the sheath and was looped along the inner lip of the cap. The tumor was then suctioned into the cap and the snare was pushed off and closed. After confirming the appropriate snare placement, both the tumor and the overlying mucosa were resected by electric cautery (Endocut Q, effect 2, VIO 200D; ERBE, Tübingen, Germany), and then the removed tumor was sent for pathological examination. Endoscopic examination then was repeated without the transparent cap in order to evaluate the wound carefully in case there was any perforation or bleeding and to ensure the absence of the residual tumor tissues. If there was spurting bleeding or active bleeding, hot forceps were usually to stop the bleeding.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
complete resection rate(R0 rate)
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
Complete resection was defined as negative horizontal and vertical margins of specimen.
within 14 days after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operating time
Time Frame: intraoperative
the time from endoscope in to endoscope out
intraoperative
complications rate
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
Complications were defined as perforation or hemorrhage during or after operation.
within 14 days after procedure
length of stay
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
calculated from the day of admission to day of discharge
within 14 days after procedure
hospitalization cost
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
represent the hospital's costs of being hospitalized
within 14 days after procedure
recurrence rate
Time Frame: one year after procedure
a new rectal NET recurred confirmed by endoscopy and EUS
one year after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

June 20, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 20, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 20, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 5, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2019

Last Verified

June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor

Clinical Trials on ESD procedure

3
Subscribe