Endoscopic Resection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Modified Cap-assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Small Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors Less Than 1 cm: a Muticenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial

In previous single center study, both modified cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (mEMR-C) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) were reported to be effective for the treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and mEMR-C was inferior to ESD for the treatment of small rectal NETs (≤10 mm), as it has shorter operation times and lower hospitalization costs. However, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is needed to prove the universality and generality of these findings.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Investigators aimed to conduct a muticenter randomized controlled trial to compare mEMR-C with ESD for the treatment of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in six tertiary hospitals in China.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

102

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age from 18 to 75 years;
  2. With a high suspicion or evidence of rectal NET assessed using EUS or colonoscopy;
  3. With tumor size ≤10 mm assessed by colonoscopy;
  4. Plan to receive mEMR-C or ESD treatment and provide written informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unable to tolerate ESD or MEMR-C as assessed by the research team of each center;
  2. Complicated with serious diseases such as malignant tumor, which may lead to shorter life expectancy, the research team considers that it is not suitable for inclusion in the study after comprehensive evaluation;
  3. Rectal NET with lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis;
  4. Received resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumor by other surgical procedures;
  5. Multiple rectal neuroendocrine tumors;
  6. Vulnerable groups such as pregnant women or patients with mental disorders;
  7. Poor compliance, unable to cooperate with treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: mEMR-C group
In mEMR-C group, enrolled patients will receive modified EMR-C without submucosal injection.
A transparent cap with an inner groove (MH-593; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) was attached to the forward-viewing colonoscope. After the endoscope was inserted into the rectum, a crescent-shaped electrosurgical snare was passed through the sheath and looped along the inner groove of the cap. Submucosal injections were not required in this method. The tumor was suctioned into the cap and grasped by tightening the snare. After confirming the appropriate snare placement, both the tumor and overlying mucosa were resected using electric cautery (Endocut Q, effect 2, VIO 200D; ERBE, Tübingen, Germany), and the resected tumor was sent for pathological examination. Endoscopic examination was repeated without a transparent cap to evaluate the wound carefully in cases of perforation or bleeding and to ensure the absence of residual tumor tissues. If there was spurting or active bleeding, hot forceps were used to stop the bleeding.
Active Comparator: ESD group
In ESD group, enrolled patients will receive the standard treatment modality of ESD to remove the rectal NET
ESD was performed as the standard procedure and has been widely described and used. First, dots were marked approximately 5 mm from the periphery of the lesion using coagulation. Subsequently, a diluted sodium hyaluronate solution with indigo carmine dye was injected submucosally. Mucosal incision and submucosal dissection were performed using a T-Type ESD Knife (Micro-Tech, Nanjing, China) or Dual-knife (Olympus Medical, Tokyo, Japan). After resection was completed, all visible vessels on the artificial wound were thoroughly coagulated to prevent postoperative bleeding.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
histological complete resection
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
complete single-piece (en bloc) resection of the targeted lesion with horizontal and vertical free margins.
within 14 days after procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
length of stay
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
calculated from the day of admission to day of discharge
within 14 days after procedure
hospitalization cost
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
represent the hospital's costs of being hospitalized
within 14 days after procedure
success rate of operation
Time Frame: intraoperative
the proportion of patients whose tumors were successfully resected in each group
intraoperative
en bloc resection
Time Frame: intraoperative
complete single resection of the targeted lesion, irrespective of whether the basal and lateral tumor margins were infiltrated or undetermined
intraoperative
operation time
Time Frame: intraoperative
the time required to complete the procedure, was taken from the installation of the snare in the mEMR-C or the first submucosal injection in ESD to the end of complete resection of the targeted area or a failure or complication of the procedure which required discontinuation
intraoperative
complications
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
perforation or hemorrhage during or after operation.
within 14 days after procedure
operation cost
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
the cost of mEMR-C or ESD procedures, except the cost of other endoscopic procedures
within 14 days after procedure
histopathologic grade
Time Frame: within 14 days after procedure
NET grade 1, NET grade 2, NET grade 3, and NEC
within 14 days after procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 27, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor

Clinical Trials on mEMR-C procedure

3
Subscribe