AURORAX-0087A: GAG Scores for Surveillance of Recurrence in Leibovich Points ≥5 Non-metastatic ccRCC (AUR87A)

May 10, 2023 updated by: Elypta

AURORAX-0087A: Glycosaminoglycan Scores for Surveillance of Recurrence in Leibovich Points ≥5 Non-metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

AUR87A is an observational prospective multicenter diagnostics test cohort study for detection of renal cell carcinoma recurrence as determined by the reference standard, which is imaging using computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen at defined intervals after primary surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Non-metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) recur in ~20% of cases within 5 years after radical surgery. Current postoperative follow-up protocols, being schematic and at best based on risk of recurrence scores, are sub-optimal for early detection of recurrences which could potentially be available for curative management. Blood and urine collected glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are promising novel class of biomarkers from which a new diagnostic test based on so called GAG scores has been developed. GAG scores have accurately distinguished localized/locally-advanced and advanced RCC from healthy subjects.

AUR87A features an adaptive design. The primary endpoint analysis is conducted when 30 events (i.e. recurrences) are reached - expected at 140 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months (cohort 1). An interim analysis at 15 events is conducted to verify whether the sensitivity and specificity estimates are in line with the study assumptions. In case of futility, the GAG scores formulations and/or cut-offs are optimized based on data from cohort 1. The primary endpoints are then validated on a second independent cohort, powered depending on the results from cohort 1. This second cohort is estimated in 140 patients (cohort 2). In case of non-futility, cohort 2 may be used as external validation.

AUR87A will prospectively enroll an estimated 280 non-metastatic ccRCC patients curatively treated with surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy). Patients are followed-up longitudinally using GAG scores in blood and urine every 3 months after surgery, alongside the current standard follow-up protocol, i.e. imaging, as reference standard.

The hypothesis of AUR87A is that postoperative increase of the GAG scores, so called "GAG recurrence ", can predict or detect recurrence at an earlier time-point compared to the reference standard, referred to as "radiological recurrence", and thereby improve the clinical utility of current follow-up protocols.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

280

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Calgary, Canada
        • Recruiting
        • Prostate Cancer Centre
        • Contact:
          • Bimal Bhindi
      • Aarhus, Denmark
        • Completed
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Odense University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Lars Lund
      • Roskilde, Denmark
        • Recruiting
        • Zealand University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Nessn Azawi
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Recruiting
        • Helsinki University Central Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Petrus Järvinen
        • Contact:
          • Harry Nisen
      • Créteil, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Henri Mondor
        • Contact:
          • Alexandre Ingels
      • Bologna, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • AOU San Orsola Malpighi
        • Contact:
          • Lorenzo Bianchi
      • Florence, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Careggi University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Riccardo Campi
        • Contact:
          • Andrea Minervini
      • Milano, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • San Raffaele Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Umberto Capitanio
      • Orbassano, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Aou San Luigi Gonzaga
        • Contact:
          • Francesco Porpiglia
      • Roma, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena
        • Contact:
          • Giuseppe Simone
      • Verona, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • AOU Integrata Verona
        • Contact:
          • Alessandro Antonelli
      • Coimbra, Portugal
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital da Luz Coimbra
        • Contact:
          • Lorenzo Marconi
      • Gijón, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Cabueñes
        • Contact:
          • Sergio Fernandez-Pello
      • Gothenburg, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • John Åkerlund
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Addenbrooke's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Grant Stewart
      • Edinburgh, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Western General Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Alexander Laird
      • Frimley, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Frimley Park Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Neil Barber
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Free Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Alex Bex
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Guys & St Thomas Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Rajesh Nair
      • Norwich, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Norfolk & Norwich University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mark Rochester
      • Reading, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Royal Berkshire Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Christopher Blick
      • Salford, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
        • Contact:
          • Satish Maddineni
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Recruiting
        • Emory University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Viraj Master
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Completed
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Recruiting
        • MD Anderson Cancer Center
        • Contact:
          • Jose Karam

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population is a representative sample of the North American and European population of ccRCC patients with LP ≥ 5 after curative intent surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Pre-screening inclusion criteria

  • Size of primary tumor >4cm (>cT1a) in greatest dimension on pre-operative abdominal CT-scan
  • Size of primary tumor ≤4cm is allowed if pre-operative abdominal CT-scan shows suspected RCCs with radiological sign of venous tumor thrombus (renal vein or caval).
  • Pre-operative CT-scan of chest and abdomen show no signs of metastatic disease
  • Localized and biopsy proven clear cell RCC (ccRCC) under active surveillance which at timepoint of study recruitment, opted for surgery because of growth rate of primary tumor to a size > 4cm
  • Elected for curative intent surgery for RCC

Final screening inclusion criteria

  • Any gender being 18 years or older at timepoint of final inclusion
  • In postoperative pathology report shown to be ccRCC subtype according to 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)
  • Leibovich points (LP) ≥5 according to Leibovich score system (2003)
  • If pathology report shows multiple subtypes in same tumor, as long as the majority of tumor is ccRCC (>50%), participant can be included

Exclusion Criteria:

Pre-screening exclusion criteria

  • TNM-stage T(any) N(any) M1 according to AJCC, i.e. metastatic disease at diagnosis
  • Absence of preoperative chest imaging (chest CT) within 60 days prior to primary surgery
  • Previous history of curatively treated for other cancers, still not deemed fully cured and participant still under surveillance for said cancer
  • Participants offered active surveillance for RCC instead of curative intent surgery
  • Participants offered any type of thermal ablation treatment instead of surgery, i.e. LP cannot be assessed

Final screening exclusion criteria

  • Participants with AJCC cN0 status at preoperative imaging in whom a clinically suspicious regional lymph-node metastases (enlarged lymph node(s)) is noted during primary surgery, but who subsequently do not undergo any lymph node dissection. (Note: participants with cN0 status at pre-operative imaging and no clinical signs of regional lymph node metastases during primary surgery can still be included irrespective of lymph node dissection having been performed, i.e. being pN0 or pN1 if it is performed or pNx if it is not performed)
  • Participants with AJCC cN1 status at pre-operative imaging in which lymph node dissection is not performed (i.e. pNx).
  • Elected for any adjuvant therapy (i.e. systemic therapy) outside or within any clinical study
  • Non-clear cell RCC histology or benign tumor (i.e. oncocytoma and angiomyolipoma, which are the most common benign types, but also any other rare types of benign renal tumors) after pathological analysis
  • Any hereditary form of RCC (e.g. Von Hippel-Lindau, Birt-Hogg-Dubé, Hereditary Papillary RCC)
  • RCC with pure sarcomatoid differentiation, also called sarcoma of the kidney
  • Previous history of curatively treated for RCC with a suspected de novo RCC in the remaining kidney tissue
  • Prior or current use of instillation therapy with hyaluronic acid and/or chondroitin sulfate (HA-CS).
  • Use of heparin, including low molecular weight heparin (e.g. Enoxaparin, Dalteparin, Tinzaparin) for concurrent disease in need of blood dilution (e.g. ongoing deep vein thrombosis or lung emboli). Note: use of of heparin for thrombus prophylaxis in conjunction with primary surgery or postoperatively ≤4 weeks will be allowed.
  • Patients who were not radically operated during primary surgery with the exception of histological positive surgical margin in participants who have undergone partial nephrectomy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cohort 1
140 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months
blood and urine samples to determine GAG scores
Cohort 2
up to 140 patients with a minimum follow-up of 12 months
blood and urine samples to determine GAG scores

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of GAG recurrence
Time Frame: minimum follow-up of 12 months
Sensitivity and specificity of GAG recurrence to LP≥5 ccRCC radiological or histologically verified recurrence with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months
minimum follow-up of 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute and relative risk increase (ARI/RRI) of radiological recurrence
Time Frame: within 6 months since last GAG score evaluation
Absolute and relative risk increase (ARI/RRI) of radiological recurrence in patients with GAG recurrence versus no GAG recurrence
within 6 months since last GAG score evaluation
Recurrence-free survival (RFS)
Time Frame: minimum follow-up of 12 months
Recurrence-free survival (RFS) in the LP≥5 ccRCC for GAG recurrence vs. no GAG recurrence with a minimum follow-up time of 12 months
minimum follow-up of 12 months
Positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of GAG recurrence
Time Frame: minimum follow-up of 12 months
Positive and negative predictive value (PPV/NPV) of GAG recurrence to LP ≥5 ccRCC radiological recurrence
minimum follow-up of 12 months
Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of GAG scores
Time Frame: minimum follow-up of 12 months
Area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC) of GAG scores to LP ≥5 ccRCC radiological recurrence
minimum follow-up of 12 months
RFS, overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS)
Time Frame: follow-up time of 2 years and 5 years respectively after primary surgery
RFS, overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) in patients with GAG recurrence versus no GAG recurrence
follow-up time of 2 years and 5 years respectively after primary surgery
Concordance-index (C-index) of preoperative GAG scores
Time Frame: follow-up time of 2 years and 5 years respectively after primary surgery
Concordance-index (C-index) of preoperative GAG scores versus risk nomograms for RFS and for CSS
follow-up time of 2 years and 5 years respectively after primary surgery
Lead-time GAG vs. radiological recurrence among true positives
Time Frame: minimum follow-up of 12 months
Lead-time GAG vs. radiological recurrence among true positives
minimum follow-up of 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Saeed Dabestani, Lund University, Dept. Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 10, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Unidentified clinical and biochemical data will become available to the research community along with the publication of a scientific article related to the present investigation.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on GAG score

3
Subscribe