Subclass of Donor-specific Antibody as a Risk Factor of Antibody Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplantation (COR-HUM)

February 22, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Montpellier

Characterization of the Subclass of Donor-specific Antibody Determined in Mass Spectrometry as a Risk Factor of Antibody Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection is now recognized as the first cause of long-term kidney transplant loss. This type of rejection is mediated by the presence of graft-specific antibodies, usually directed against HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens), called DSA (Donor Specific Antibody).

De novo DSA (ie, post-transplantation) is detected in approximately 20% of transplant recipients in the first five years, and is a major risk factor for antibody mediated rejection and graft loss.

All anti-HLA antibodies therefore do not have the same pathogenicity. Some teams have shown that the detection of IgG3 anti-HLA by cytometry is associated with a higher risk of humoral rejection but these results have not been confirmed by others. One of the limitations of the cytometry by Luminex technique is that it only informs the detection of each subclass but does not allow analysis of the distribution of the different subclasses of a DSA.

A method has been developed for the relative detection and quantification of different subclasses of the DSA using the mass spectrometry technique and will be tested during this study. This new quantification method therefore opens up the prospect of studying whether, not only the presence but especially the distribution of IgG subclasses, in particular IgG3, could constitute a reliable and robust marker of humoral rejection.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Antibody-mediated rejection is now recognized as the first cause of long-term kidney transplant loss. This type of rejection is mediated by the presence of graft-specific antibodies, usually directed against HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens), called DSA (Donor Specific Antibody). It results from the interaction between DSA and HLA present on the surface of graft endothelial cells, complement activation, endothelial cell activation and recruitment of inflammatory cells within the renal microcirculation leading to a graft dysfunction.

De novo DSA (ie, post-transplantation) is detected in approximately 20% of transplant recipients in the first five years, and is a major risk factor for antibody mediated rejection and graft loss. However, the presence of a DSA is not always associated with humoral rejection.

All anti-HLA antibodies therefore do not have the same pathogenicity. The antibody titre (assessed by the fluorescence average (MFI) on Luminex beads) is involved in the risk of rejection but is far from explaining the disparities in clinical evolution.

DSA are mainly IgG of different subclasses whose distribution could have a major impact on their pathogenicity. Indeed, complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) functions differ according to IgG subclass. IgG3 is the subclass that has the greatest potential for complement activation followed by IgG1. IgG3 and IgG1 are also the two subclasses with the best affinities for the FcγRIIIa activating receptor for ADCC mediated by Natural Killer (NK) cells.

Some teams have shown that the detection of IgG3 anti-HLA by cytometry is associated with a higher risk of humoral rejection but these results have not been confirmed by others. One of the limitations of the cytometry by Luminex technique is that it only informs the detection of each subclass but does not allow analysis of the distribution of the different subclasses of a DSA.

A method has been developed for the relative detection and quantification of different subclasses of the DSA using the mass spectrometry technique and will be tested during this study. This new quantification method therefore opens up the prospect of studying whether, not only the presence but especially the distribution of IgG subclasses, in particular IgG3, could constitute a reliable and robust marker of humoral rejection.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hérault
      • Montpellier, Hérault, France, 34090
        • CHU Lapeyronie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients 18 years old and over with kidney transplant and who have DSA

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - Patients over 18 years old
  • Renal transplant patients followed at the University Hospital of Montpellier presenting a DSA de novo during follow-up.
  • Affiliation or beneficiary of a social security scheme.

Inclusion criteria specific to patients whose graft biopsy has already been performed

  • Patients who consented to the collection of a plasma sample on graft biopsy day and use in future programs (Collection DC-2014-2328)
  • Collection of non-opposition to participate in the study

Inclusion criteria specific to patients whose biopsy of the graft has not already been performed:

  • Eligible for graft biopsy for humoral-mediated rejection (according to Banff 2015 classification) (Appendix 1)
  • Collection of non-opposition to participate in the study
  • Signature of informed consent to participate in the collection of a plasma sample on graft biopsy day and use in future programs (Collection DC-2014-2328)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women according to Article L1121 5 of the health public Code
  • Vulnerable persons according to article L1121-6 of the health public Code
  • Major persons placed under guardianship or curator

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
patient with kidney transplant
Blood sample will be took from subjects during this research

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
distribution of DSA IgG subclasses
Time Frame: day 0 (inclusion visit)
the performance of the distribution of DSA IgG subclasses for the diagnosis of humoral rejection in renal transplant patients with Donor Specific Antibodies
day 0 (inclusion visit)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
histological criteria for humoral rejection
Time Frame: day 0 (inclusion visit)
Link between the distribution of DSA IgG subclasses and histological criteria for humoral rejection (according to the Banff International Classification 2015)
day 0 (inclusion visit)
degradation of graft function
Time Frame: 1 year after inclusion of subjects
Link between the distribution of DSA IgG subclasses and degradation of graft function (glomerular filtration rate loss of more than 25%)
1 year after inclusion of subjects
graft loss
Time Frame: 1 year after inclusion of subjects
Link between the distribution of DSA IgG subclasses and graft loss
1 year after inclusion of subjects

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Pernin, Doctor, UH Montpellier

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RECHMPL18_0455 UF7724

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Antibody-mediated Rejection

3
Subscribe