- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04072848
Mathematically Arterialised Testing of Hypercapnic Subjects Study (MATHS)
September 27, 2022 updated by: Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
A Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Investigate the Physiological Agreement Between Arterial Sampling (the Reference Method) and Mathematically Arterialised Venous Blood
Prospective observational cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with suspected hypercapnic respiratory failure and requiring treatment with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as part of standard, routine management.
Contemporaneous blood gas samples will be obtained via arterial, capillary, and venous methods.
The venous samples will undergo mathematical arterialisation via the v-TAC system.
In line with standard medical care, arterial samples will be obtained before starting NIV and at two set points afterwards (day 1 post-NIV, and pre-discharge).
Pre-existing clinical thresholds will be used to assess the reliability of v-TAC against ABG, the existing gold standard and will conduct a retrospective model of decision-making once the blood sampling component of the study is concluded.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
84
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Cambridgeshire
-
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB2 0AY
- Royal Papworth Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Adult patients with suspected chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure admitted as part of routine clinical care for consideration of home NIV.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years or above.
- Admitted for consideration of home Non Invasive Ventilation.
- Due to undergo arterial blood gas sampling as part of routine clinical care
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Clinical necessity to perform blood gas sampling prior to allowing sufficient time for informed consent.
- Inability to obtain reliable SpO2 readings
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in blood carbon dioxide level (PaCO2)
Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 1
|
Change in PaCO2 between the pre-NIV (non-invasive ventilation) and day 1 NIV samples for ABG (arterial blood gas) versus v-TAC (arterialised venous blood gas)
|
Between day 0 and day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG)
Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 1
|
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG) between the pre-NIV and day 1 samples
|
Between day 0 and day 1
|
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG)
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG) between the pre-NIV and pre-discharge samples
|
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Relative difficult in sampling
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Frequency of sampling error rate for ABG versus CBG versus VBG versus V-TAC
|
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Patient experience
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Using Numeric Pain Scale where 0 is no pain, 5 is moderate pain and 10 is worst pain possible
|
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Patient preference
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Patient preference for method of blood gas sampling will be recorded in medical records
|
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Davies, Royal Papworth Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 15, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 8, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
July 31, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 23, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 27, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
August 28, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 28, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 27, 2022
Last Verified
May 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- P02375
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingAcute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure | Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingAcute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaCompletedChronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureItaly
-
Alung TechnologiesCompletedHypercapnic Respiratory Failure, COPD, ARDSGermany
-
Institut für Pneumologie Hagen Ambrock eVResMedCompletedCOPD | Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureGermany
-
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della...CompletedAcute Hypoxic - Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure (ARF)Italy
-
Yonsei UniversityNot yet recruitingRespiratory Failure | Respiratory Insufficiency | Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure | Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure | Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure | Ventilatory Depression | Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure | Respiratory Depression | Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure | Hypercapnic AcuteKorea, Republic of
-
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di BolognaCompletedCOPD | Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureItaly
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisDirection Générale de l'Offre de SoinsCompletedHypercapnic Respiratory FailureFrance
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingComparison Between HVNI vs Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure