Mathematically Arterialised Testing of Hypercapnic Subjects Study (MATHS)

September 27, 2022 updated by: Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

A Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Investigate the Physiological Agreement Between Arterial Sampling (the Reference Method) and Mathematically Arterialised Venous Blood

Prospective observational cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with suspected hypercapnic respiratory failure and requiring treatment with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) as part of standard, routine management. Contemporaneous blood gas samples will be obtained via arterial, capillary, and venous methods. The venous samples will undergo mathematical arterialisation via the v-TAC system. In line with standard medical care, arterial samples will be obtained before starting NIV and at two set points afterwards (day 1 post-NIV, and pre-discharge). Pre-existing clinical thresholds will be used to assess the reliability of v-TAC against ABG, the existing gold standard and will conduct a retrospective model of decision-making once the blood sampling component of the study is concluded.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Cambridgeshire
      • Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, CB2 0AY
        • Royal Papworth Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with suspected chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure admitted as part of routine clinical care for consideration of home NIV.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or above.
  • Admitted for consideration of home Non Invasive Ventilation.
  • Due to undergo arterial blood gas sampling as part of routine clinical care

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Clinical necessity to perform blood gas sampling prior to allowing sufficient time for informed consent.
  • Inability to obtain reliable SpO2 readings

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in blood carbon dioxide level (PaCO2)
Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 1
Change in PaCO2 between the pre-NIV (non-invasive ventilation) and day 1 NIV samples for ABG (arterial blood gas) versus v-TAC (arterialised venous blood gas)
Between day 0 and day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG)
Time Frame: Between day 0 and day 1
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG) between the pre-NIV and day 1 samples
Between day 0 and day 1
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG)
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
Change in PaCO2 between ABG versus v-TAC versus Capillary Blood Gas (CBG) versus Venous Blood Gas (VBG) between the pre-NIV and pre-discharge samples
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
Relative difficult in sampling
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
Frequency of sampling error rate for ABG versus CBG versus VBG versus V-TAC
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
Patient experience
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
Using Numeric Pain Scale where 0 is no pain, 5 is moderate pain and 10 is worst pain possible
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
Patient preference
Time Frame: Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days
Patient preference for method of blood gas sampling will be recorded in medical records
Between day 0 and through to study completion, up to 3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael Davies, Royal Papworth Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure

3
Subscribe