Preemie Prep For Parents (P3): Home Antenatal Prematurity Education

February 6, 2024 updated by: Mir A Basir, Medical College of Wisconsin

Preemie Prep For Parents (P3) Outpatient Mobile Intervention: Home Antenatal Prematurity Education

The Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) mobile intervention will be tested in an outpatient population of pregnant women at risk of preterm birth and their partners. The study is a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing knowledge and preparedness for decision making between a group receiving the P3 texts and videos and a group receiving links to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) prematurity patient education handouts.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a randomized controlled study focused on an outpatient population of pregnant women at risk of preterm birth and their partners. The objective is to test the efficacy of the Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) intervention on prematurity knowledge and preparedness for decision making.

Participants are recruited from their obstetric clinic appointment between weeks 16 and 21, and randomized 1:1 to either the P3 intervention, or access to electronic ACOG handouts (active control). Any participating partners are assigned to the same arm as their pregnant partner. The participants in the P3 group will then receive a schedule of automated text messages, with video links, up to twice a day. These videos and messages are based on information relevant to their gestational age.

At study entry, participants will complete measures of their health literacy, anxiety, decision self-efficacy, and subjective global health. As pregnancy continues, questionnaires will be sent to participants at the start of their 25th, 30th, and 34th weeks. These questionnaires will include Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaires (specific to their gestational age), a Preparation for Decision Making scale, and an anxiety measure. At study completion, within two weeks of either preterm childbirth or completion of the 34 week questionnaire, participants will be asked to also complete the Educational-Aid Questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

175

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53226
        • Froedtert Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant woman or her partner
  • At risk for preterm birth, as indicated by: history of spontaneous preterm birth (during the 34th week or earlier), shortened cervical length, multiple gestation, fetal growth restriction, chronic hypertension, history of preeclampsia, and/or diabetes requiring medications.
  • Gestational age of 16-21 weeks at recruitment.
  • Owns a smartphone.
  • Able to speak English

Exclusion Criteria:

• Pregnancies with known significant birth defects.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) Outpatient Mobile Intervention
The P3 mobile intervention in its current form sends participants text messages according to a schedule based on their gestational age. These text messages contain links to short videos uploaded to the P3 site, focusing on topics related to preterm labor and premature infants.
The P3 mobile intervention sends participants text messages according to a schedule based on their gestational age. These text messages contain links to short videos uploaded to the P3 site, focusing on topics related to preterm labor and premature infants.
Active Comparator: ACOG links
Participants in the active control condition will receive links to patient education handouts about preterm birth provided by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Participants in the active control condition will receive links to patient education handouts about preterm birth provided by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 25th week of pregnancy.
Knowledge questionnaire developed by research team and tested through cognitive interviews, testing parental prematurity knowledge recommended by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Subscales consist of long-term outcomes, variability in due date estimation, general prematurity knowledge, lowest gestational age needed for survival, factors influencing preterm birth outcome, treatment options, short-term outcomes, and advocacy. Subscale scores are summed to create a composite score. Versions of the questionnaire are slightly different at follow up points to ensure gestational age specific clinical relevance; the version at 25 weeks the questionnaire has 38 items. Therefore the range of scores is from 0-38, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
Assessed at participant's 25th week of pregnancy.
Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 30th week of pregnancy.
Knowledge questionnaire developed by research team and tested through cognitive interviews, testing parental prematurity knowledge recommended by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Subscales consist of long-term outcomes, variability in due date estimation, general prematurity knowledge, lowest gestational age needed for survival, factors influencing preterm birth outcome, treatment options, short-term outcomes, and advocacy. Subscale scores are summed to create a composite score. Versions of the questionnaire are slightly different at follow up points to ensure gestational age specific clinical relevance; the version at 30 weeks the questionnaire has 35 items. Therefore the range of scores is from 0-35, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
Assessed at participant's 30th week of pregnancy.
Parent Prematurity Knowledge Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 34th week of pregnancy.
Knowledge questionnaire developed by research team and tested through cognitive interviews, testing parental prematurity knowledge recommended by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Subscales consist of long-term outcomes, variability in due date estimation, general prematurity knowledge, lowest gestational age needed for survival, factors influencing preterm birth outcome, treatment options, short-term outcomes, and advocacy. Subscale scores are summed to create a composite score. Versions of the questionnaire are slightly different at follow up points to ensure gestational age specific clinical relevance; the version at 34 weeks the questionnaire has 30 items. Therefore the range of scores is from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge.
Assessed at participant's 34th week of pregnancy.
Preparation for Decision Making Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 25th week of pregnancy.
Preparation for Decision Making Scale (Graham, O'Connor 1996, revised 2005). Scale ranges from a score of 10 to 50; these scores are converted to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation as recommended by the creators. Higher scores indicate higher perceived level of preparation for discussing a healthcare related decision.
Assessed at participant's 25th week of pregnancy.
Preparation for Decision Making Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 30th week of pregnancy.
Preparation for Decision Making Scale (Graham, O'Connor 1996, revised 2005). Scale ranges from a score of 10 to 50; these scores are converted to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation as recommended by the creators. Higher scores indicate higher perceived level of preparation for discussing a healthcare related decision.
Assessed at participant's 30th week of pregnancy.
Preparation for Decision Making Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 34th week of pregnancy.
Preparation for Decision Making Scale (Graham, O'Connor 1996, revised 2005). Scale ranges from a score of 10 to 50; these scores are converted to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation as recommended by the creators. Higher scores indicate higher perceived level of preparation for discussing a healthcare related decision.
Assessed at participant's 34th week of pregnancy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). As a Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), not all participants receive the same number of questions, but may range between 4 and 12 questions. The number and selection of questions is dependent on the previous responses. An average US adult has a score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10; the higher that t-score, the greater amount of anxiety the respondent is reporting.
Assessed at baseline
Anxiety
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 25th week of pregnancy.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). As a Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), not all participants receive the same number of questions, but may range between 4 and 12 questions. The number and selection of questions is dependent on the previous responses. An average US adult has a score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10; the higher that t-score, the greater amount of anxiety the respondent is reporting.
Assessed at participant's 25th week of pregnancy.
Anxiety
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 30th week of pregnancy.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). As a Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), not all participants receive the same number of questions, but may range between 4 and 12 questions. The number and selection of questions is dependent on the previous responses. An average US adult has a score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10; the higher that t-score, the greater amount of anxiety the respondent is reporting.
Assessed at participant's 30th week of pregnancy.
Anxiety
Time Frame: Assessed at participant's 34th week of pregnancy.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT). As a Computer Adaptive Test (CAT), not all participants receive the same number of questions, but may range between 4 and 12 questions. The number and selection of questions is dependent on the previous responses. An average US adult has a score of 50 with a standard deviation of 10; the higher that t-score, the greater amount of anxiety the respondent is reporting.
Assessed at participant's 34th week of pregnancy.
Decision Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline
Decision Self-Efficacy Scale (O'Connor, 1995). Scale ranges from a score of 0 to 44; these scores are converted to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation as recommended by the creators. Higher scores indicate higher perceived level of decision self-efficacy.
Assessed at baseline
Decision Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: Assessed at 34 weeks of pregnancy
Decision Self-Efficacy Scale (O'Connor, 1995). Scale ranges from a score of 0 to 44; these scores are converted to a 0-100 scale for ease of interpretation as recommended by the creators. Higher scores indicate higher perceived level of decision self-efficacy.
Assessed at 34 weeks of pregnancy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

March 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Premature Birth

Clinical Trials on Preemie Prep for Parents (P3) Outpatient Mobile Intervention

3
Subscribe